Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-11, 01:46 PM   #1
episodic
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South
Bikes: Had a Surly Cross Check - was totaled in recent accident. Sadly now just a Fuji Crosstown as a backup bike.
Posts: 415
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Help me make a choice here - a pretty easy one I think

I'm looking at getting a replacement tourer. I had used a Surly Cross Check - and based off what I learned before that one was wrecked (car hit us) - I think I want a Surly LHT. However, a semi local shop can sell me a Trek 520 for what I'd pay for the LHT. The only wrinkle in everything is the fact that I'd probably ride a 54 LHT (I had a 52 cross check - and it felt small - the shop I bought from 'race fit' me I found later).

I guess I have a slightly unusual build. I have a 29inch inseam - yet I'm 5'11" - short legs long torso.

So since I'd ride a 54 - I have the 26" wheel issue. I've tried to read up on it - and it doesn't seem to be that big of a deal. I do enjoy weekly group rides with a 'semi quick' group of guys though. I was already the 'oddball' with a steel frame and brooks saddle on my cross bike. However, I never had any problem being one of the faster members of the group. We do 40-60 mile rides with 18-20mph averages.

So my choices are:
Surly Cross Check - just get a bigger one this time (would have to spend money to upgrade rear cassette for hill country - and putting road slicks on instead of the cross tires)
Surly LHT - (I like the gearing better, I would have to spend money to add range on the cross check as I did before).
Trek 520 - seems to be a sweet bike - but I would have to order sight unseen, and I know nothing about the bike's reputation.

All three of the bikes would be with $100 dollars of each other, with the trek topping out the local prices.

Last edited by episodic; 08-07-11 at 01:52 PM.
episodic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-11, 01:53 PM   #2
davidad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
The 520 is a well made bike. So fit is your most important consideration. You seem to have found out that the secret to going fast lies in the engine.
davidad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-11, 08:52 AM   #3
BigBlueToe
Senior Member
 
BigBlueToe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
Posts: 3,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the 26" wheel issue isn't that big of a deal, but I also think that if you want 700 wheels, that's what you should have. From what I've heard, the 520 is an excellent tourer. I have an LHT and can attest that it's also an excellent tourer. I won't try and say which is the best choice, but I think neither is a bad choice.
BigBlueToe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM.