Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-11, 04:17 PM   #1
viper_04649
was fixed, now i am free
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Bikes: Royal H Rando, IRO Mark V Pro, Redline Monocog 29er
Posts: 148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Touring on an Bridgestone XO-1 / Handsome Cycles XOXO

Let me preface by saying that I know the XOXO is not the XO-1, but seems to be my best bet for finding something like an XO-1, where the XO-1 is very hard to find and very expensive. Also, Handsome cycles seems like a cool company that are designing some very practical bikes.

My question:
Has anyone toured on an XO-1 or an XOXO? I know that people call them a tourer, and you can tour on anything, but not ideally. The HT/ST angle is 73* which seems pretty steep for comfortable touring, from my research. And i am having a very difficult time trying to find any accounts of people touring on these.

My story:
I have to ween down my fleet. I currently have a Royal H rando, an IRO fixed gear, a 29er Monocog single speed mtb, and a ('93) Trek 520 frame. I would like to have 2 bikes. A road bike, and a city/touring bike. The rando is a custom bike which i put too much money into and i get too nervous locking it up, or leaving it alone for any extended amount of time, so that is out for a city bike. The 520 is sitting in my basement, next to pile of 7-speed XT stuff. But the 520 would be pretty slow for a 95% city bike, and this is why I am thinking of the XOXO.

thanks

Last edited by viper_04649; 09-12-11 at 05:03 PM.
viper_04649 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-11, 07:29 AM   #2
niknak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
The 520 seems like a perfect bike for the city and for a bit of touring. It's older, so you'll likely not fret about the paint getting scratched or the bike getting stolen.

Whether a bike is fast is all about how you set it up. You can mount narrow tires and set the handlebars lower than the saddle for a more aero position.

The XOXO doesn't really look like a great touring bike anyway.
niknak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-11, 09:27 AM   #3
Chris_in_Miami
Senior Member
 
Chris_in_Miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not sure that the XOXO would necessarily be faster than the 520, I agree with niknak that it's a matter of setup. I considered picking up an XOXO as a commuter also, but ultimately the XOXO lost the contest on eyelet count. My choice certainly won't be fast though...

Chris_in_Miami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-11, 10:28 AM   #4
viper_04649
was fixed, now i am free
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Bikes: Royal H Rando, IRO Mark V Pro, Redline Monocog 29er
Posts: 148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So when i said faster, what I really meant is more nimble riding through the city, with cars. It will be replacing a "track" bike, which has steep angles and what not.

Chris, is that a Schwinn High Sierra?
viper_04649 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-11, 10:38 AM   #5
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 22,193
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1135 Post(s)
With a touring load aboard, you have some handling issues with an overly light frame.

thats when the design ups the tube spec to meet the load demands.

but for a 95% city bike there are commuter setups , drop-bar, disc brake ,
clearance for mudguards, eyelets for a rear rack, perhaps that would be more suitable.

Or consider a Bike Friday, the 406 wheels are stronger.
and by virtue of the lower mass of a smaller wheel , steering response is very quick.
when needed, stable when not.
and the fees are lower to travel with the bikes, packed in a small box or suitcase,
than a big wheel bike packed in a normal bike box.

Last edited by fietsbob; 09-14-11 at 10:45 AM.
fietsbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-11, 11:03 AM   #6
Chris_in_Miami
Senior Member
 
Chris_in_Miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by viper_04649 View Post
So when i said faster, what I really meant is more nimble riding through the city, with cars. It will be replacing a "track" bike, which has steep angles and what not.

Chris, is that a Schwinn High Sierra?
I see. The XOXO does appear to have the nippy geometry you're looking for. I've seen plenty of accounts of touring on 90's era rigid MTBs, which are fairly similar to the XOXO. Maybe not optimal, but it depends on what you plan to encounter, and they can be comfy.

Yes, that is an '87 High Sierra, it's replacing a Peugeot Alpin touring bike and a Rockhopper commuter. I'm trying to thin the herd also.
Chris_in_Miami is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 AM.