Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    2.25 tires for new SURLY LHT disc 2012

    I google it for all over the evening and did not found an exact answer, I want to put Schwalbe marathon extreme 2,25 tires on my new Surly lht disc model with 26'' wheels.
    What do you think about it?

  2. #2
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://surlybikes.com/bikes/disc_trucker

    Tire clearance - 26": 2.1" with or without fenders; 700c: 42mm with fenders, 45mm without fenders. Individual tire and rim combos affect tire clearance

  3. #3
    On a Mission from God FunkyStickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Thibodaux, LA
    My Bikes
    Custom chopper, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think 2.25" tires will fit in the fork. They will fit in the rear, but the stock fork is too narrow.

    Here's a shot of some 26x2.15 tires in the stock fork. There is literally only about 2mm clearance:
    trekking-lht-2.jpg

    However, the Marathon Extreme comes in 26x2.0, which should fit fine with fenders. I'd go with the 2.0's

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by seeker333 View Post
    http://surlybikes.com/bikes/disc_trucker

    Tire clearance - 26": 2.1" with or without fenders; 700c: 42mm with fenders, 45mm without fenders. Individual tire and rim combos affect tire clearance
    Mmmm I found this man on Yahoo - http://www.blogcatalog.com/post/d075...f8ec231d6fd40f.
    He is only one who said that he used on lht 2,25 tires I think it is very interesting, may be someone else???

    FunkyStickman, thanks for the photo it seems that there is no free space for 2,25, but guy above inspired me a lot...

  5. #5
    On a Mission from God FunkyStickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Thibodaux, LA
    My Bikes
    Custom chopper, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Some manufacturers don't make their tires exactly the size they say they are, plus it depends on the width of the rim it's mounted on. It may be possible, but I'd still go with the 2.0's

    Read down to the bottom of the guy's blog, he even says it himself:
    If i were to start over again, i'd definitely go for the 2.0" tires instead of the 2.25".

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't read anything cause it shows the mistake when I try to proceed for the whole article, 2,0'' is also a good width for touring tire, now I have set of Kojak, but 2,25 is more stable I think and is better for off-road, so what definetly he is saying about why he would start over with 2.00"?

  7. #7
    Senior Member amckimmey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Surly Long Haul Trucker, Surly Pugsley Special Ops
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just go with a Surly Troll, I have a LHT, but cant help to think of how amazing my troll would be for a off road touring bike.
    Surly Long Haul Trucker - Schwinn Continental - Building up a Trek 7000

    Read my BLOG about bikes, & my life in Eugene, Bread Bike

  8. #8
    On a Mission from God FunkyStickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Thibodaux, LA
    My Bikes
    Custom chopper, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He said the 2.25's were such a tight fit, he was constantly having to adjust the wheels to keep them from rubbing. Other than that, they were perfect.

    The Ogre is a good bike too, has lots of options if you're not worried about it not being a traditional "touring" bike. Plus it's orange!

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FunkyStickman thanks again, Troll and Ogre no doubt are good bikes, but I already got one mtb frame and after couple of 40 day long trips in Asia and Europe realised that when you have 20 kg luggage on the rear all pros of mtb geometry sucks IMHO. In long trips the main thing is touring geometry=comfort and new 26" lht disc trucker gives all that... I want to believe it))
    I have a set of incredible strong wheels - 26" rhino lite xl rims with dt swiss spokes and sealed bearing dmr revolver hubs, so it will cooperate fine with new disc trucker. What tires is concerned, I will stop on newest Schwalbe Marathon Mondial 26" 2,15 - it would fit just perfect lht disc trucker fork as far I understand from the picture above...

    The last thing I am thinking about is the size of the frame to choose 58 or 60, it is touring bike, but with 26 wheels. I am 183 cm long and have 89 cm true cycling inseam, what would you reccomend? I used this calculation 89*0,66=58,74. Are my calculations right for the touring geometry frame but with 26" wheels?

  10. #10
    On a Mission from God FunkyStickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Thibodaux, LA
    My Bikes
    Custom chopper, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would go with the shorter frame, it will be difficult to mount the bike and straddle it loaded if you can't stand over it.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    58 frame has standover height - 83 см
    60 frame - 85 cm
    My inseam 89 cm so, in both options, I will stay firmly on the ground, but distance between top tube and my crotch area would be different, so it is better to leave more cm with 58 frame or a little bit less with 60 frame? What option would be better for touring needs?

  12. #12
    On a Mission from God FunkyStickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Thibodaux, LA
    My Bikes
    Custom chopper, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In that case, you'd want to see which one has the right size top tube length for you. There are several bike fit calculators that can help you with it. I prefer smaller frames for a more upright riding position, you might not.

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    58 would be the best one than, the only trouble is that lht disc version sellingS begin only in april((((
    Last edited by Lostin; 12-05-11 at 12:33 PM.

  14. #14
    working on progress treebound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    most have two wheels, but some have one or three
    Posts
    2,748
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lostin View Post
    FunkyStickman thanks again, Troll and Ogre no doubt are good bikes, but I already got one mtb frame and after couple of 40 day long trips in Asia and Europe realised that when you have 20 kg luggage on the rear all pros of mtb geometry sucks IMHO. In long trips the main thing is touring geometry=comfort and new 26" lht disc trucker gives all that... I want to believe it))
    ....
    Potentially a dumb question, but why couldn't you get a different fork with more tire clearance for the LHT? As long as the length, rake/trail, were similar then would it matter? Or do you need the low-rider mounts? Or possibly something else I'm over-looking. But if the only limiter is the fork clearance then it "seems" simple enough to just swap out the fork, assuming the geometry works after the swap.
    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
    Life happens, don't be a spectator.

  15. #15
    On a Mission from God FunkyStickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Thibodaux, LA
    My Bikes
    Custom chopper, Surly LHT
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by treebound View Post
    Potentially a dumb question, but why couldn't you get a different fork with more tire clearance for the LHT? As long as the length, rake/trail, were similar then would it matter? Or do you need the low-rider mounts? Or possibly something else I'm over-looking. But if the only limiter is the fork clearance then it "seems" simple enough to just swap out the fork, assuming the geometry works after the swap.
    You could, it would be possible, though there aren't many other 26" forks shorter than the LHT one. The Big Dummy fork would be close.

  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by treebound View Post
    Potentially a dumb question, but why couldn't you get a different fork with more tire clearance for the LHT? As long as the length, rake/trail, were similar then would it matter? Or do you need the low-rider mounts? Or possibly something else I'm over-looking. But if the only limiter is the fork clearance then it "seems" simple enough to just swap out the fork, assuming the geometry works after the swap.
    It is a possible way of building the first tourer for my purposes, but question about tires was just theoretical, new mondials from schwalbe goes with max size 2.15 and I think that is quite ideal option as for road, so for off-road conditions.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    50mm tires are sufficient.

    For nearly anything carrying touring weight, anyway.

  18. #18
    Doesn't ride enough Lamabb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Carmel, NY
    My Bikes
    2010 Cannondale Caad9 5 / 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker/ 2013 Orbea Orca Bli2 / 2011 Specialized Rock Hopper
    Posts
    345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I rode From Washington D.C. to Denver with the 2 inch marathon supremes' and they worked like a champ. But it was pretty overkill and I could feel the power being sapped from me due to the tire's width. I would recommend 1.5 in or 1.75 for road. You do feel like you can take on anything with the 2 inches, but if you don't plan on encountering gravel or anything off-road, I suggest thinking of a smaller width.

  19. #19
    Senior Member enigmaT120's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Falls City, OR
    My Bikes
    2012 Salsa Fargo 2, Rocky Mountain Fusion, circa '93
    Posts
    1,516
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lamabb View Post
    I rode From Washington D.C. to Denver with the 2 inch marathon supremes' and they worked like a champ. But it was pretty overkill and I could feel the power being sapped from me due to the tire's width. I would recommend 1.5 in or 1.75 for road. You do feel like you can take on anything with the 2 inches, but if you don't plan on encountering gravel or anything off-road, I suggest thinking of a smaller width.
    Those are what I have on my Fargo and I like them. But I do ride on several miles of gravel each way commuting, and for fun riding will almost always go up on the logging roads, not on pavement. I don't think they will work if I get snow though.
    Ed Miller
    Falls City, OR
    1993 Rocky Mountain Fusion
    2012 Fargo 2

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,303
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by enigmaT120 View Post
    Those are what I have on my Fargo and I like them. But I do ride on several miles of gravel each way commuting, and for fun riding will almost always go up on the logging roads, not on pavement. I don't think they will work if I get snow though.
    riding home last night in a downpour I have to say that 2" Supremes make riding through puddles a lot more secure given the ruts hidden in them and I'm not riding at high speed.

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are 1.6 marathon supremes (40mm) in 700c and 26. I have them in 26 and they are great. Still overkill for paved roads, but great for mixed terrain.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Northwestrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    My Bikes
    Surly Long Haul Trucker, Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, Dahon Mu P 24 , Bacchetta Strada, Rodriguez Tandem, Wheeler MTB
    Posts
    2,153
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I also am 183cm in height, with an inseam of 88cm. I have just test ridden the 56,58, and 60cm LHT. In my case, I felt the 60 was too big, 56 too small, the 58, ahhhh just right. I'll be staying with drop bars. My only point of indecision is whether to go with 26" or 700c tires. I'm leaning toward the 700's though. Good luck.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •