Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

New (2012) Surly Long Haul Trucker spec's.

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

New (2012) Surly Long Haul Trucker spec's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-12, 02:59 PM
  #1  
ghost on a machine
Thread Starter
 
Bike Hermit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 216

Bikes: Rivendell A. Homer Hilsen, Serotta Colorado Legend TG, Rivendell Roadeo, Surly Cross Check, Surly Big Dummy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
New (2012) Surly Long Haul Trucker spec's.

I'm curious what the opinions are on the component changes to the Long Haul Trucker complete bike. A summary:
-Tektro CR720 brake calipers instead of Tektro Oryx.
-slight upgrade to bottom bracket (no more plastic cup)
-Cane Creek 40 headset replaces the Ritchey Comp
and to offset these:
-Less expensive front and rear derailleurs, Sora in front and LX in rear.
-LX hubs replace the XT's
To my mind these are all good changes making the bike even a better value. The derailleurs should work as well and be at least as durable. Not sure about the hubs. The XT's have an oversize aluminum axle and the LX's have a standard steel one, which does allow for bigger bearings in the rear, but I don't know about overall durability.

Last edited by Bike Hermit; 01-18-12 at 11:58 AM. Reason: fred fixed the thread title. thanks fred
Bike Hermit is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 03:26 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Change things that you don't like, or want different, , and know,
Just replacing things along the way .. It happens.

they, product managers that order the bikes from the TW contract factory,
make choices, that either they think will help sell them,
negotiated the best price , for the job lot they needed.
or just meet the price target to get the price acceptable.

like XT is probably a cherry pick.. visible, bling up the pick list.

Or LX, just went down a notch to keep within target price point.

the dealer you buy the bike thru would give you a take-off trade in ,
and put the wheels of your choice on.
and ETC. all along the list.

Last edited by fietsbob; 01-17-12 at 04:56 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 04:00 PM
  #3  
Here's a Quarter...
 
trafficcasauras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 141

Bikes: iro phoenix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ive bought 4 bikes the last 3 years, and i plan on downgrading everything! the cheaper the better!
trafficcasauras is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 05:42 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hubs LX instead of XT is an upgrade for as far as durability is concerned, will be a bit heavier though.

Are you sure about the BB metal cup? It still says Shimano UN-54 on their site, it's the 55 that has a metal cup instead of plastic if I'm not mistaken?
Lasse is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 07:11 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
Hubs LX instead of XT is an upgrade for as far as durability is concerned, will be a bit heavier though.
What is this based on?
Doug64 is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Velocommuter Commando
 
Sirrus Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,683

Bikes: '88 Specialized Sirrus, '89 Alpine Monitor Pass, two '70 Raligh Twenties, '07 Schwinn Town & Country Trike, '07 Specialized Sirrus Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by trafficcasauras
ive bought 4 bikes the last 3 years, and i plan on downgrading everything! the cheaper the better!
I don't blame you. Most of the upper end stuff is geared to racing and to the professional racing model no less. Where you run components (hard!) for a season then sell off and or scrap it for all new kit the next year
Sirrus Rider is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 08:33 PM
  #7  
Slow Rider
 
bwgride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Doug64
What is this based on?
A number who use the newer XT hub with aluminum axle report failures; you should be able to find example reports with a search of these forums or on the net. If the model XT contained a steel axle (e.g., M750 or M755) then changing to LX probably won't make a difference in durability, but if changing to LX from an XT model with aluminum axle (e.g., M770 or M778), I agree the LX is better for a touring bike.
bwgride is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 08:55 PM
  #8  
Fat Guy Rolling
 
dcrowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville Kentucky
Posts: 2,434

Bikes: Bacchetta Agio, 80s Raleigh Record single-speed, Surly Big Dummy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I actually just upgraded my LHT's brakes to the CR720s. I like them.

I don't know about the hubs. I hope the new XT hubs are good, I just had a new rear wheel built with a new XT hub (front is an Alfine dynohub, had two new wheels built and kept originals as spare).

I doubt the other parts make much difference. I hated the look of the plastic cap on the BB, but it's been working with no issues for 6700 miles or so.
dcrowell is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 09:33 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
.. Based on the steel axle hub uses the proven 1/4" balls as their main bearing.
the aluminum axle needs to be fatter to not break, often,
and the sacrifice is the wheel's axle bearing balls are needing to be reduced in size.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-17-12, 09:50 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
.. Based on the steel axle hub uses the proven 1/4" balls as their main bearing.
the aluminum axle needs to be fatter to not break, often,
and the sacrifice is the wheel's axle bearing balls are needing to be reduced in size.
Are 9-14" bearings better than 13-3/16" bearings? Why? How much weaker is the aluminum axle? We've gone around about this on this forum before, and there was not any case that I can remember where anyone actually had a XT axle failure. It was mostly unsupported speculation and hear say. I run both LX and XT hubs and hopefully live long enough to see at least one set fail!
Doug64 is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 04:16 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
According to "Leerboek wentellagers", SKF, 1985:
"In general, maximum load on a ball bearing is proportional to outer diameter of bearing times width of bearing (where width is measured in direction of axle)."
So smaller bearings = lower maximum load, if outer diameter is equal.
According to techdocs.shimano.com (exploded views of the hubs; FH-M770 vs FH-M580) the LX rear hub has more seal rings, this might be an added benefit but I'm not sure the more expensive hubs don't have an alternative to keep out the dirt (I don't see any alternative in the docs though).
Lasse is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 08:41 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
BigBlueToe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 3,392

Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My first thought would be to trust Surly's decisions. (I know, naive perhaps. Call me Pollyanna if you wish.) So far they've proven pretty smart in designing the LHT. Based on what I've seen, it's probably outselling all the other tourers by far.

I built my LHT up from a frame so I have no one to blame but myself for bad component choices. So far, I haven't had a single problem, and I love the bike.
BigBlueToe is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 12:07 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
According to "Leerboek wentellagers", SKF, 1985:
"In general, maximum load on a ball bearing is proportional to outer diameter of bearing times width of bearing (where width is measured in direction of axle)."
.

Agreed, but the question is: are 9 big ones better than 13 small ones? I really think this argument is academic, and that either size or configuration is more than adequate for bike touring. Heck, I'm a biologist not an engineer!

So smaller bearings = lower maximum load, if outer diameter is equal.
I don't understand this part of the statement.

Having serviced both XT and LX hubs, I think the XT has as good or better seals than the LX. I would have gone with the LX hubs, just due to price, if they were available when I had the wheels built. I was a little anxious when I realized the XT hubs had an aluminum axle, but it does not seem to be a problem. I have about 4,500 miles on the XT hubs including a fully loaded 2900 mile tour that covered over 400 miles of unpaved roads and trails, over 500 mile of cobblestones, and experienced 35 days of rain.

I believe that the XT hubs are harder to adjust correctly than the LX, resulting in many of the perceived problems. They cannot be pre-loaded while adjusting them. They just take a little more care to set up. Like Bike Blue Toe, I built up both my wife's and my touring bikes, and can only blame myself if something does not work.

Last edited by Doug64; 01-18-12 at 12:27 PM.
Doug64 is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 01:24 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Let the hangers-on here know.. As a mechanic who worked on Shimano stuff
thru the 80's-90's
in bike shops , for many summers. My touring rigs went for simple durable,
reliable and proven..
Shifting was not indexed , but friction, bar end, and a Phil Wood freewheel hub.

now y'all have a good tour, whatever you get.. it's about going somewhere,
not shopping, in the end.
Don't get too OCD on minutiae.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 02:16 PM
  #15  
Fat Guy Rolling
 
dcrowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville Kentucky
Posts: 2,434

Bikes: Bacchetta Agio, 80s Raleigh Record single-speed, Surly Big Dummy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fietsbob
now y'all have a good tour, whatever you get.. it's about going somewhere,
not shopping, in the end.
Don't get too OCD on minutiae.
Sage advice, but it's winter. Getting hung up on the minutiae is what we do during the cold months.
dcrowell is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 02:58 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
sage advice, but it's winter. Getting hung up on the minutiae is what we do during the cold months
.

Yup
Doug64 is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 10:21 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 217
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Call it the thrill of the hunt
Altamont is offline  
Old 01-18-12, 10:33 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 366
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The part i read on the new specs was ....64cm frame size wooooo finally a frame close to big enough....
choteau is offline  
Old 01-19-12, 09:23 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,206

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3460 Post(s)
Liked 1,466 Times in 1,144 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug64
... ... and there was not any case that I can remember where anyone actually had a XT axle failure. It was mostly unsupported speculation and hear say. I run both LX and XT hubs and hopefully live long enough to see at least one set fail!
I do not think anyone has actually had the Aluminum axle fail, it is a large diameter chunk of metal and is quite robust. There however were several reported failures of bearings and one or two reported failures of the freehub to hub body connection on the LHT forum on Google Groups soon after the switch to Aluminum axle XT hubs. Those reported failures were early after the switch and I do not know if there was an early problem that was later fixed or not.

I have an Aluminum axle front hub (M770) on one of my bikes, I got the hub at a good price and I have not heard of any front M770 hub problems. So, I would not have any concerns about the front hubs. But I have stayed with steel axles for all of my rear hubs.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 01-20-12, 03:48 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by choteau
The part i read on the new specs was ....64cm frame size wooooo finally a frame close to big enough....
Waiting for that one myself.

Hopefully they get them out soon and without delay...
JensM is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alaskadude
Touring
41
06-27-18 05:33 PM
Samiam277
Touring
10
07-25-13 03:01 PM
Volvoline
Mountain Biking
21
08-09-11 02:14 PM
Devious Rhesus
Touring
19
06-06-11 07:02 PM
c3hamby
Touring
5
01-25-11 08:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.