Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am in the market for rear panniers. I am considering lone peaks. They come in 3000 cu in and 2500 cu in. The 3000 seems big to me. What size do you recommend. I will be camping with tent and all cooking gear.
    Rob

    Oh yeah I will be using front panniers and handlebar bag.
    Last edited by wolfclan333; 01-18-05 at 07:03 PM.

  2. #2
    senile member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    My Bikes
    1 mtb converted for commuting (actually, collecting dust in the garage), a LHT with "durable components"
    Posts
    351
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    do you also use front panniers?

  3. #3
    Formerly Known as Newbie Juha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,721
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is very much a question of your packing and touring habits. If you have front panniers and the discipline not to fill your panniers to capacity, why not get the bigger pair? Even if it feels like extra space now, it might come handy sometime.

    For what it's worth, I have 2x24 liters (a bit less than 3000 cu in) in the rear and 2x13 liters in the front when I tour with a tent and cooking gear. That is a lot of space, and a LOT of weight if packed full. I always try to leave some space as I tour with too much junk as it is. I also like to be able to fit in daily groceries without having to repack everything.

    --J
    To err is human. To moo is bovine.

    Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?


    Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
    Community guidelines

  4. #4
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi,
    for me, 2500 is a good, general purpose size. It's big enough for
    a change of clothes in one, and a bag of groceries in the other. It's
    enough for credit card touring. It's big enough for yard sale-ing until you buy a couch

    If you want to do loaded touring with a tent, and all that... then go for the 3000,
    you may also need front panniers.

  5. #5
    Mad bike riding scientist cyccommute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
    Posts
    15,600
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Juha
    It is very much a question of your packing and touring habits. If you have front panniers and the discipline not to fill your panniers to capacity, why not get the bigger pair? Even if it feels like extra space now, it might come handy sometime.

    For what it's worth, I have 2x24 liters (a bit less than 3000 cu in) in the rear and 2x13 liters in the front when I tour with a tent and cooking gear. That is a lot of space, and a LOT of weight if packed full. I always try to leave some space as I tour with too much junk as it is. I also like to be able to fit in daily groceries without having to repack everything.

    --J
    I agree. Using a set of 1500 cu in and a set of 2400 cu in bags (front and rear, respectively) is your best bet. I have another set of bags that are in the 4000 cu in range and I never use them.

    Spread the load around. 50% front, 50% rear or even 60% front is best.

    Stuart Black

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •