Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Why is my Windsor Tourist so heavy!?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Why is my Windsor Tourist so heavy!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-12, 09:27 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NW Chicago
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why is my Windsor Tourist so heavy!?

I have a 54cm windsor tourist.. great bike.. always thought it was on the heavy side. Walked into REI and checked out their 56cm LHT and CC.. WOW those bikes felt like they were at least 10 lbs lighter! Sure, mine had plastic fenders, pedals, an aluminum rear rack, and a greenfield kickstand.. surely those weights added up can't make up the weight difference right!? I also didn't think there would be that much weight difference between the naked frames..

I wonder if the windsor was shipped with cheap heavy rims.. Any ideas? What would likely by the components making up the weight difference?
boogman is offline  
Old 08-20-12, 10:26 PM
  #2  
 
BigAura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chapin, SC
Posts: 3,423

Bikes: all steel stable: surly world troller, paris sport fixed, fuji ss

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 623 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 33 Posts
Weighing a bike by just lifting it, is too subjective. You need to weigh the bike with a scale. Park tools makes an expensive digital scale for this purpose, but you could also use a less expensive luggage scale. My LHT is quite heavy at 33 pounds. Fenders, racks, 2.0 touring tires, and Brooks saddle add a lot of weight.
BigAura is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 01:38 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Got a scale?
strip it down weigh just the frame, then weigh each part as you put it all together,
then you will see the final weight is a sum of all the parts..

IDK, maybe they used thicker wall tubes , from cheaper sources ,
to bring the price down to attract customers
who just shop for lowest price..

Last edited by fietsbob; 08-21-12 at 10:50 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 02:29 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
It's deceptive just lifting a bike up by hand, and especially so when your Windsor is not beside the LHT or CC for an immediate comparison. You need to check the weight with a scale and with both bikes in identical condition (ie, either stripped or fully accessorised).
Rowan is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 05:05 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
I think you may be mistaken. My Windsor is lighter than an LHT if the weights people post for their LHTs are even close to accurate. I think every report I have read of an LHT weight was over 30 pounds and usually in the 32+ pound range. My Windsor weighed 29 pounds including racks and a 1 pound seat bag of tools and spare tubes. That was with heavier 32mm tires so it is probably a bit less now that it has 28 mm gatorskins on it.

I think the LHT frame is at least a little heavier. The LHT is heavier duty and has longer wheelbase so I would be very surprised if that was not true. It would not surprise me if the Cross Check frame was a little lighter than the Windsor frane, but probably not very much if it is.

In most cases a major portion of the weight difference between bikes is in the tires and accessories folks bolt on. Tires can make a big difference. Even in the same size something like the marathon plus can add at least two pounds to the bike. If you go for a tire like that in a larger size the difference can be even more. The range of weights of racks is pretty wide as well and can amount to a substantial difference, A set of Surly racks weigh something over 5 pounds other choices often can be half that. Most fenders add about a pound and a half for a set. Even the choice if inner tubes can make a difference especially if you are carrying a couple spares.

Last edited by staehpj1; 08-21-12 at 05:38 AM.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 05:35 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
bud16415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Erie Penna.
Posts: 1,141
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Here is how I weighed my Tourist.
Bike stand holding a $8 luggage scale from Wal-Mart.

bud16415 is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 06:30 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NW Chicago
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah i guess the individual accessories on my bike can add up the weight diff.. But this is not the frst time i lifted up the surlys at the store. Everytime i did it, and then comparing it to my windsor at home, the windsor felt significantly heavier, more so than the sum of the accessories.. But guess i could be wrong.. I was just seeing if there was a known component, if of cheap quality, would introduce significant weight difference
boogman is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 07:41 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
boogman, I built my tourer, but not with a nod towards weight, but rather reliability and on a budget that allowed me to determine if I wanted to tour I could keep what I had a feel good about the build, or if it wasn't for me I wasn't into the project too deep. The biggest weight offenders are the wheelset and the tires. I could probably lose close to three pounds by changing what I have, but I really don't see a reason to do so. From the thread regarding touring bike's weight it seems, IIRC, most when equipped with racks, pedals and water bottle cages averaged out in the 30-32 pound range.


The Windsor, from what I've read, has a very good reputation, except for the wheelset which is possibly from where most of the price point saving was made.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 08:25 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by bradtx
The Windsor, from what I've read, has a very good reputation, except for the wheelset which is possibly from where most of the price point saving was made.
The wheels are probably the weakest point in the spec for this bike other than the lack of a low enough granny gear, but I have done a good bit of touring including a TA and some other longish tours with mine and still have the original wheels on it. So they are at least adequate if not optimum.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 08:32 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bradtx
The biggest weight offenders are the wheelset and the tires.
There's also significant weight in the frame itself, components, and racks. The touring bike I built around Nashbar's aluminum frame and Ultegra components weighs in at 23lbs ready to ride (but without racks, luggage, and water bottles). Granted some of the missing weight comes from the wheels (Synergy OC rims, XTR hubs) and tires (Vittoria Randonneur Hyper 700x35) but there's probably several pounds attributable to the frame, components, and lack of racks. Inexpensive steel racks, for instance, are often very heavy.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 01:09 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
sstorkel, True, but boogman is comparing his steel bike with another steel bike. Your bike is lighter than my Cannondale, BTW.

staehpj1, The Windsor was on my short list if I couldn't have found a Cannondale within a reasonable amount of time. Just like my Cannondale, if there is one major improvement to be made I feel it's the wheelset. Probably like you, my wheelset is all sorted out now WRT tension and true'g and acceleration isn't so much part of the T bike's mission statement.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 08-21-12, 10:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bradtx
sstorkel, True, but boogman is comparing his steel bike with another steel bike. Your bike is lighter than my Cannondale, BTW.
All steel frames are not created equal. Different alloys, different tube wall thicknesses, different joining methods (lugged vs. fillet brazed vs. TIG welded) etc. can mean that there's a noticeable difference in weight between two steel frames.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 08-22-12, 09:44 AM
  #13  
Bike rider
 
alexaschwanden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: san jose
Posts: 3,167

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh Clubman

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Touring bikes are usually heavier because they have to beef certain structural points on the frame to be able to carry great amounts of weight.
alexaschwanden is offline  
Old 08-22-12, 11:31 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
Posts: 3,741
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
To make it go downhill faster?

With extra strenght comes extra weight.......weight weenies make lousy tourers.....all they do is complain.....
Booger1 is offline  
Old 08-22-12, 02:39 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
I was just seeing if there was a known component, if of cheap quality,
would introduce significant weight difference
Its the Doughnuts !
fietsbob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rootboy
Classic & Vintage
76
12-30-19 11:25 PM
mi.tom
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
8
07-31-17 09:02 AM
Caad08
Road Cycling
49
06-17-14 10:29 AM
Trasselkalle
Alt Bike Culture
23
01-12-10 11:18 AM
adam_mac84
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
37
01-05-10 10:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.