Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Cottage Grove, MN
    My Bikes
    1980 Motobecane Super Touring (Foul-weather Commuter), 1984 Trek 620 (Fair-weather Commuter), 1986 Trek 1500, 1989 Bridgestone CB-2 (Winter Commuter), 2013 Trek 520 (Touring)
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Minnesota Bicycle Map

    The State Of Minnesota has released the first draft of the new Minnesota Bicycle Map. Check it out online at: www.mndot.gov/bike/maps/.

    Also there is a short survey to give feedback about the map.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Northern Minnesota
    My Bikes
    1985 Trek 720, 2010 CAAD9-6, mid-90s Trek 750 hybrid (winter bike)
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by backontheroad View Post
    The State Of Minnesota has released the first draft of the new Minnesota Bicycle Map. Check it out online at: www.mndot.gov/bike/maps/.

    Also there is a short survey to give feedback about the map.
    There are quite a few errors in the map regarding traffic density, shoulders, etc.

    I now have learned that this map is a "mockup" to show design choices, which explains the prevalence of those errors.

    With respect to design, there are some areas for improvement. Here are the biggest ones:

    There are only two classes of road, "lighter traffic" and "heavier traffic", with no indication of the dividing line. This is near useless, especially if the cutoff is an AADT of, say, 3500. There's a huge difference between a road with an AADT of 500 and one with 3500. Note: most bike maps of this sort have at least 3 gradations for traffic density, some have 5.

    The map doesn't differentiate between paved and unpaved roads (this is information that's already on the standard MN highway map).
    Last edited by OldZephyr; 09-11-12 at 06:16 PM. Reason: learned that draft is a design mockup

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Northern Minnesota
    My Bikes
    1985 Trek 720, 2010 CAAD9-6, mid-90s Trek 750 hybrid (winter bike)
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was contacted by a person at MN DOT and I understand from her that the draft map is only a design mockup.
    Last edited by OldZephyr; 09-11-12 at 06:17 PM.

  4. #4
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,619
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Besides the map being 28mb, I did find the map to be a bit confusing, with too many routes listed. Hopefully they will condense this down to be regional maps of Minnesota. I submitted feedback and did also thanked them for the effort. Minnesota has a very good reputation for cycling, especially Minneapolis.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Northern Minnesota
    My Bikes
    1985 Trek 720, 2010 CAAD9-6, mid-90s Trek 750 hybrid (winter bike)
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gpsblake View Post
    Besides the map being 28mb, I did find the map to be a bit confusing, with too many routes listed. Hopefully they will condense this down to be regional maps of Minnesota. I submitted feedback and did also thanked them for the effort. Minnesota has a very good reputation for cycling, especially Minneapolis.
    I agree, a state the size of Minnesota should be divided into at least 4 regions for a map project like this. Wisconsin's map set is 4 maps, although you can download them county by county. The Illinois map set is something like 8 or 9 maps (and that's for a state that's smaller than Minnesota).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •