Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    1, 2, 3 and to the 4X
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    210
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What size disc rotor?

    Any of y'all swapped out the 160 mm rotors your bike no doubt came with stock for larger rotors? If so, why and what rotor did you switch to? Was the decision out of weight concerns or simply wanting better stopping power?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    My Bikes
    Hollands Touring Bike, Schwinn mountain bike, folding bike, tandem and triple
    Posts
    545
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Vaya uses 160 mm rotors and they seem to work fine for me and I am a Clyde. I have seen modern tandems with disks that are much bigger. I don't have a disk equipped mountain bike so I have no experience there.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    245
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 250lbs and went with a disc trucker with avid bb7 road and STI shifters. Did a tour from nyc to joplin and had PLENTY of braking power with std 160mm rotors. Can't imagine anyone having any need to go larger. I estimate I must have been at about 340lbs total weight including the bike and the panniers. anybody much heavier than that aint getting up the hills that you need the brakes for!

  4. #4
    Senior Member mtbikerinpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    PA
    My Bikes
    92 Giant Sedona ATX Custom
    Posts
    1,672
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The larger rotors are good when you need to increase the mechanical advantage/heat dissipation such as what you would get from high speed trail use. I have raced XC with moderate downhill and never had a problem with 160mm. Recently I modified my main rig to 140mm rear with no detriment. I figured the lower mechanical advantage could aid anti-lock control and it has proved to be the case. Very balanced power. Short of a tandem or wild use 160 should be alright.
    Aviation Mechanic, Bike racer, Fitness Equipment Restorer

    http://pedalmybike.com/userTrackies/myTrackie4758.jpg[/url]

  5. #5
    Senior Member dwmckee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem, Jamis Xenith Race,'88 Bob Jackson Touring Bike (I love this one best), Co-Motion Cascadia Touring Bike, Salsa Fargo, Burley TAB
    Posts
    675
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbikerinpa View Post
    The larger rotors are good when you need to increase the mechanical advantage/heat dissipation such as what you would get from high speed trail use. I have raced XC with moderate downhill and never had a problem with 160mm. Recently I modified my main rig to 140mm rear with no detriment. I figured the lower mechanical advantage could aid anti-lock control and it has proved to be the case. Very balanced power. Short of a tandem or wild use 160 should be alright.
    I ride in Pittsburgh area with lots of very steep and windy hills that need lots of extended braking to stay safe. I definitely had fade with stock Avid BB7 160s and recently switched front rotor to a 180 Shimano with an aluminum spider to give me more heat dissipation capacity. Just changing one rotor to a better quality larger rotor made a huge difference in essentially eliminating fade... I do ride in an area with 10% windy long hills & hairpin turns so am on the extreme side for road riding I suspect. I weigh 200 lbs and ride a Salsa Fargo.

  6. #6
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,656
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is sort of a moot point since few disc-capable touring framesets will accommodate rotors larger than 160mm in diameter.

  7. #7
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    38,912
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems, with 406 wheels my 160 discs on the bike friday PL
    are relatively huge.
    Last edited by fietsbob; 11-09-12 at 10:35 AM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Werkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pipe Creek, Texas
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I progressed from 160 to 180 to 200mm up front, and 140 to 160 to 180mm in the rear. My routes have steep hills, pad glazing was frequent with the smaller rotors, no longer happens with the larger rotors; bigger is better on many levels, including on the rear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •