Hub question-why do people recommend Deore XT?
#1
Ride steel!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hub question-why do people recommend Deore XT?
In researching touring wheels I have found many people/shops advocating the DeoreXT hubs and almost no one mentions 105 or Ultegra Hubs. Why is this? Are the Deore Hubs stronger? more reliable?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
The short answer is that Deore XT is better for loaded touring, while 105 and Ultegra are race-oriented. This is based on research I have been doing recently, not personal experience; I am shopping for my first touring bike now. Edited to add: I have no prejudice here regarding 105/Ultegra vs. XT; I have only used Campagnolo thus far, for riding on the road, not touring.
Last edited by Rex G; 03-06-05 at 06:47 PM. Reason: to add a disclaimer
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southeast MN
Posts: 188
Bikes: Atlantis, Bleriot, Waterford,Steamroller, Big Dummy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Part of the reason is that many touring bikes are made with 135mm rear dropout spacing. This is incompatible with rear road hubs like Ultegra and 105 (130mm spacing). Deore XT (and other mountain rear hubs) measure 135mm.
#5
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ny
Posts: 1,764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also The xt's are better sealed than most road hubs and most of Shimano's lower end MTB hubs The Xt's boron heat treated bearing races should last a helluva long time with yearly servicing. and if you are at the ends of the earth You will probaly have slighty better luck finding loose ball bearings than a sealed beaing assembly.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Of the 135mm hubs, XT has the best price/performance. If you go to XTR , Shimano start using lightweight materials and sacrifice some durability esp for the axle. The bearings and seals are as good as you can get, parts are widely available and the cup/cone design resists the sideways sway of touring loads better than many cartridge bearing hubs.
The cartridge bearing alternative is something like a Phil Woods which is 3x the price.
The cartridge bearing alternative is something like a Phil Woods which is 3x the price.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 89
Bikes: Giant VT, Kona Hot commuter, Fetish Fixation ss, Fetish velocita road bike, ATP recumbent set up as human powered snowmobile (2 skis)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't agree that at the XTR level $himano starts sacrificing durability. I think XTR rear hubs are the most durable hub known to man, maybe Phil Wood excepted. I have one that's 12 years old I beat to crap on a mountain bike and now use on my commuter with only a bearing change, must have 6,000 miles or more on it easily. The XT is a great cheap hub.