Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Which of these bikes would be more suited for touring?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Which of these bikes would be more suited for touring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-14, 11:11 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JediBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Which of these bikes would be more suited for touring?

Hello everyone,

So I'm about to buy a new bicycle that I plan to use for long distance commute, fitness training and touring on vacations.
Looking for a fast well-balanced bike, I thought about a hybrid or a flat bar road bike.

Which of these you think is more suited for touring while being fast for my other activities?

Thanks for your the sage opinion.


Scott Sub Speed 40 Men 2014 $670


Giant Seek 3 2013 $750

Giant Escape 2 2014 $750

Scott Metrix 30 Bike 2014 $830

Giant Rapid 3 triple $1100
JediBiker is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 11:26 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
JediBiker, The first bike listed looks good for light to medium touring weights.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 01-16-14, 12:27 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
What's the largest tire that can be fitted for each model? Has it got low enough gears for touring when carrying a load in the terrain that I anticipate? Rack attachment braze-ons are nice but not necessary if you are willing to use a trailer. Finally, which bike can you ride comfortably for hours on end? These are the questions you need to answer
robow is offline  
Old 01-16-14, 02:17 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: City of Brotherly Love
Posts: 1,562

Bikes: Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
for touring, I like he Escape 2 best. The features I liked were the lowrider mounts on the fork and the longer chainstays.
Bezalel is offline  
Old 01-16-14, 09:40 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,234
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18410 Post(s)
Liked 15,530 Times in 7,326 Posts
Originally Posted by Bezalel
for touring, I like he Escape 2 best. The features I liked were the lowrider mounts on the fork and the longer chainstays.
+1, especially if you have large feet and will be carrying panniers as opposed to a trailer.

And Robow poses some important questions. I will add wheel strength to the mix. How much of a load do you intend to carry and how? (E.g., Trailer? Four panniers?).
indyfabz is online now  
Old 01-16-14, 10:04 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JediBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm still deciding but I like the idea of a trailer instead of panniers, although as I don't have experience and I don't know the pros ans cons of each. But I like the trailer because you don't put the weight ON the bike so that would allow me to go for a more lightweight bike.
Nice questions Robow I guess my final decision should be after I test ride each one.
Also I noticed that the Scott Sub and Giant Escape are more stretched out in their geometry and has a longer chainstays as Bezalel said. What impact does this geometry has on the ride oppose to the others bikes?
JediBiker is offline  
Old 01-16-14, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
"Touring" is the trip .. the bike just gets you down the route , on the trip.



A hybrid with a triple crank is good, maybe change the stock 3rd cog for smaller tooth count

Keeping all the controls & swapping the stock straight bars for figure-8 bend trekking bars is simple.*


dealer knocks 10% off accessories at point of sale, so get the racks, etc. fitted by them , then ..

*Ergon GR5 are good too,, though the 8 offers more hand positions..
(drop bars are expensive conversions involving more parts buys)

Last edited by fietsbob; 01-16-14 at 10:23 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-16-14, 10:20 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
mulveyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In the wilds of NY
Posts: 1,572

Bikes: Specialized Diverge, Box Dog Pelican, 1991 Cannondale tandem

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JediBiker
I'm still deciding but I like the idea of a trailer instead of panniers, although as I don't have experience and I don't know the pros ans cons of each. But I like the trailer because you don't put the weight ON the bike so that would allow me to go for a more lightweight bike.
Nice questions Robow I guess my final decision should be after I test ride each one.
Also I noticed that the Scott Sub and Giant Escape are more stretched out in their geometry and has a longer chainstays as Bezalel said. What impact does this geometry has on the ride oppose to the others bikes?

With longer chainstays you'll have a more sedate, stable ride. And for touring purposes they can help eliminate heel strike on panniers. ( There are ways of getting around this with short chainstay bikes like panniers cut with angles at the contact point, moving the panniers back and up, etc, but they're not really great solutions. )

I borrowed a trailer for a short while when I was trying to decide between panniers/racks and a trailer, and it didn't take long for me to decide "Nope, not for me." I really disliked it when cornering and going down hills. Lots of people feel otherwise, though.

Personally, I love touring on my Sojourn with 38mm tires, very low gearing, and cushy ride, especially since I do a fair amount of riding on old rail trails/etc. At 33 pounds all-up weight it is however quite the heavy beast compared to many other dedicated touring bikes.
__________________
Knows the weight of my bike to the nearest 10 pounds.
mulveyr is offline  
Old 01-19-14, 06:22 PM
  #9  
bill nyecycles
 
the sci guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 3,328
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times in 190 Posts
might be out of your price range, but take a look at the Surly Ogre
__________________
Twitter@theSurlyBiker
Instagram @yankee.velo.foxtrot
the sci guy is offline  
Old 01-19-14, 09:16 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,480

Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 246 Posts
Easy Question.... NONE of them hybrids.
700 bucks or less = Windsor Tourist.
GamblerGORD53 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gdlerner
Touring
0
01-20-18 10:29 AM
pawanmengane
Touring
8
10-18-10 08:00 AM
EKW in DC
Touring
15
09-15-10 07:55 AM
waterbugg
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
29
09-05-10 09:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.