Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Trek 520 ~ 32 Hole vs 36 Hole Mavic A719 Front Rim??

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Trek 520 ~ 32 Hole vs 36 Hole Mavic A719 Front Rim??

Old 04-22-14, 10:50 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Trek_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA to Fort Belvoir by VRE and bike
Posts: 117

Bikes: 2006 Trek 1000 SL, 1995 Performance 505 MTB, 2012 Trek 520 (my daily commuter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek 520 ~ 32 Hole vs 36 Hole Mavic A719 Front Rim??

For the last two years I have used my Trek 520 for a 20 mile daily commute to and from work (6260 miles to date). At the end of January this year I had to replace the Bontrager rear wheel (at about 5800 miles) as the rim brakes had worn the sidewall almost all the way through. I decided on a Mavic A719, 36 hole rims, DT dbl butted spokes and XT hub, build wheel. Since I was replacing the rear I decided to have the front wheel build by my local shop with a Dyno hub and the same Mavic A719 36 holes rims.

The rest of the story.

Since early February, Mavic has been out of stock on the 36 hole A719 rims. In the future, I plan to use the 520 for some light to medium weight touring.

Question: Would it be a mistake to have the front wheel built with the 32 hole Mavic A719??
Trek_geek is offline  
Old 04-22-14, 11:39 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 605

Bikes: 1966 Carlton, 197X MKM, 1983 Trek 620, 1988 Schwinn High Sierra, 1995 DBR Axis Ti, 1999 Waterford, 2016 DBR Release, 2017 Surly Travelers Check

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Trek_geek
Question: Would it be a mistake to have the front wheel built with the 32 hole Mavic A719??
You'll be fine with a well-built 32 spoke wheel unless you are a really big person or you are carrying really heavy loads. At one point it was common to run more spokes in the back than the front, and for good reason! Most of your weight is in the back, the front wheel simply doesn't need to be as strong.

My current wheelset is 32/36 (front/back) and I've happily toured with a medium load spread all across it with no issues. And they are the first wheels I've built myself. Especially on a rim as beefy as the A719, 32 holes will be more than enough if built and tensioned well.
jmeb is offline  
Old 04-22-14, 11:53 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Tim_Iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643

Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
What jmeb said. 36 is stronger than 32, but for the front it's not as vital.

The only problem is if you already have the dyno hub with 36 holes. Don't try to lace the 32 hole rim to a 36 hole hub.

Sounds like you're smart enough not to do that.

Nice pick on rims and hubs, btw. Should be strong and durable.
Tim_Iowa is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 07:30 AM
  #4  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,210
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2735 Post(s)
Liked 969 Times in 792 Posts
wearing out your rim shows you predominantly use your rear brake more than front, but I would strongly suggest getting into the habit of when returning from a wet ride, take 1 min and wipe down the rims with an old rag to get the gritty junk that gets all over them. Keeping an eye on the pads can make a big difference as well as tiny bits of aluminum from the rim and/or little bits of gravel or whatever often gets imbedded in the pad material, really doing a number on rims.
Softer pads also make a big difference for rim life.

this really fast rim and pad maintenance will make a huge difference in reducing rim wear, simply because you reduce the amount of abrasive material that wears down the rim.
If this sort of maintenance isnt your thing, I'd very much suggest buying softer pads, such as Kool Stop salmon coloured ones, using both front and back equally at the least when braking (my front pads wear out about twice as fast as the rears as I use the front brake much more than the rear)
Another little trick is when braking and you hear that scrapey sound of gritty stuff on the rim, sometimes a few quick on-off brake applications will get the worst off and you will hear less gritty sound when you really have to brake harder.

I realize conditions vary and rider weight and braking styles are different, but to give you an idea, I have rims that last ten years and more of commuting with similar distances as yours.

down the road, perhaps a bike with disk brakes would be good for your riding conditions and wear rate (Im thinking cost here of replacing rims every 2 years)
djb is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 08:25 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,177

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3452 Post(s)
Liked 1,452 Times in 1,131 Posts
A lot of utility bikes were built with 32 front and 40 rear several decades ago.

When I built up a new touring bike a year ago I considered getting a lighter weight rim in the front than rear, the only reason that I did not was that I wanted my rims to visually match each other.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 08:38 AM
  #6  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Your front wheel does not need as many spokes because it carries less loads and has no dish, the 32 spoke wheel will be as strong or stronger than the rear 36 because of this.

There is also no problem using 36/36... a few extra spokes up front is not the end of the world either.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 08:51 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,865
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1250 Post(s)
Liked 753 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by Trek_geek
At the end of January this year I had to replace the Bontrager rear wheel (at about 5800 miles) as the rim brakes had worn the sidewall almost all the way through.
That seems odd and premature. Odd that the rear wore out first from braking. I know that I wear out the front first by a large margin if it is the braking surfaces that are the issue. Is it extremely hilly where you ride? Rims always last me much longer than that even in the mountains.

Originally Posted by Trek_geek
Question: Would it be a mistake to have the front wheel built with the 32 hole Mavic A719??
No, it makes perfect sense. I'd likely do that anyway even if I could get a 36 hole rim.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 09:05 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,923 Times in 1,207 Posts
32 holes on the front should be fine.

But I gotta ask, what's the point of a 32 hole A719? Why would Mavic build a heavy touring rim to let the rider turn around and save 20 grams on four spokes? It doesn't make sense to me...
pdlamb is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 12:14 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896

Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
If you haven't already built the rear wheel with Mavic A719s, you might want to consider Velocity Dyad rims. The Dyads are just as strong as A719s but lighter weight and available in various hole drillings. If you've already got the A719 rear wheel built, then I agree with others that a 32-hole rim should be fine for the front wheel. On most bikes, 60% or more of the weight is borne by the rear wheel, which is one reason why rear tires wear out so much quicker.
tarwheel is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 02:36 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
I agree with folks that a 32 hole rim should be adequate for the front rim. However, the only spokes I've ever broken were on my 32 spoke front wheel ( about 10,000 miles on it) while on a tour several years ago. I attributed it to the work done to it prior to the tour. Three spokes broke at the nipple which leads me to believe they were twisted during the trueing process. Going off a very high curb with loaded front panniers might also have something to do with it. I have since replaced the wheel set with 36 spoke wheels.

Last edited by Doug64; 04-23-14 at 07:35 PM.
Doug64 is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 03:28 PM
  #11  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
36 hole rims

Originally Posted by Trek_geek
For the last two years I have used my Trek 520 for a 20 mile daily commute to and from work (6260 miles to date). At the end of January this year I had to replace the Bontrager rear wheel (at about 5800 miles) as the rim brakes had worn the sidewall almost all the way through. I decided on a Mavic A719, 36 hole rims, DT dbl butted spokes and XT hub, build wheel. Since I was replacing the rear I decided to have the front wheel build by my local shop with a Dyno hub and the same Mavic A719 36 holes rims.

The rest of the story.

Since early February, Mavic has been out of stock on the 36 hole A719 rims. In the future, I plan to use the 520 for some light to medium weight touring.

Question: Would it be a mistake to have the front wheel built with the 32 hole Mavic A719??
I have a couple of new 36 hole matrix rims one 27" and one 700 located in Montana if one of them would work for you.
2johns is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 03:33 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
36 hole rims

Originally Posted by Trek_geek
For the last two years I have used my Trek 520 for a 20 mile daily commute to and from work (6260 miles to date). At the end of January this year I had to replace the Bontrager rear wheel (at about 5800 miles) as the rim brakes had worn the sidewall almost all the way through. I decided on a Mavic A719, 36 hole rims, DT dbl butted spokes and XT hub, build wheel. Since I was replacing the rear I decided to have the front wheel build by my local shop with a Dyno hub and the same Mavic A719 36 holes rims.

The rest of the story.

Since early February, Mavic has been out of stock on the 36 hole A719 rims. In the future, I plan to use the 520 for some light to medium weight touring.

Question: Would it be a mistake to have the front wheel built with the 32 hole Mavic A719??
I have a couple of new 36 hole matrix rims one 27" and one 700 located in Montana if one of them would work for you.
2johns is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 03:56 PM
  #13  
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 359

Bikes: Salsa Fargo, One-One Inbred 29er, Blue Norcross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wear front vs rear is not just a function of how much you brake on each wheel. It is also a function of how much grit gets on the pads and rim. I killed my first rear rim (around 8000 miles, including commuting in the winter) well before the front wore out, and except in sketchy winter conditions, I brake harder on the front.

Back to the question at hand, like others have said, 32H in the front is fine. Depending on how you pack, 28h might even be okay, but considering your rim choice and the selection of a dyno hub, I see no reason to save that bit of weight. 32h is standard enough that, if you murder your wheel in the middle of nowhere, you will be able to find a replacement. A racing-type bike shop may not have 36h rim on hand, so I have been moving my bikes to 32h (or less on my race bike, but that is a different story), and always carry a fiber fix spoke when on long rides/tour.

Never broke a spoke on my hand-built 32 and 36h wheels, but broke several on a machine-built rear. That said, these days I carry a fairly light load (<220lbs bike+load+rider), so for some it may be a bit different equation.
fotooutdoors is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 04:26 PM
  #14  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,210
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2735 Post(s)
Liked 969 Times in 792 Posts
Good point, more junk certainly does collect on my rear rims. I really enjoy hard braking and hate the sound of grittiness on rims and pads, and find the 1min wipe job to be so effective. I have friends and family members who don't give a hoot.

Back to spoke count, my 32 spoked Tricross wheels have worked fine with about 40-45 lbs of load, but I'm light and I had the wheels properly tensioned at one point, which I figure was really key.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Tricross_loaded_2013-0723.jpg (105.6 KB, 37 views)

Last edited by djb; 04-23-14 at 09:00 PM.
djb is offline  
Old 04-23-14, 09:05 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
chriskmurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,134

Bikes: Borealis Echo, Ground Up Designs Ti Cross bike, Xtracycle, GT mod trials bike, pixie race machine

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
That is a really strong rim and assuming the build is good it should be plenty strong, even if you are a heavier rider. People get very hung up on thinking you must use 36 spokes for a touring wheel. I always suggest it because on a touring bike you will not notice the weight at all an it is worth the extra security but the vast majority of the time 32 spokes is more than sufficient.
chriskmurray is offline  
Old 04-24-14, 07:29 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Trek_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA to Fort Belvoir by VRE and bike
Posts: 117

Bikes: 2006 Trek 1000 SL, 1995 Performance 505 MTB, 2012 Trek 520 (my daily commuter)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WOW!!
All really good advice.

Yes I ride all year around, so the rear rim had two No. Virginia winters. They use quite a bit of both salt and sand on the roads and YES I hate the grinding sound the road slop causes. Until the hoses freeze up I try to rinse off the whole bike and both front and rear brake pads. Around here I even do it after a winter rain storm because the wet kicks up so much grit on the brakes. I also try a monthly full wash down including pulling the brake pads and cleaning out the bits and pieces of grit and aluminum. I have a "file card" with it's very fine, hard steel teeth that works great for that. I even swap my pads front to back to get more miles out of the set. I run 700x40 Clement X'plor MSO Adventure tires all winter with Planet Bike fenders so perhaps that contributes to the retention of the road grit on top of the pads

I am 6'3" and go about 210. Not a behemoth but not a light weight either.

I have emailed my shop to go with the 32 hole A719 if Mavic doesn't restock the 36. It has been a pain waiting but since I don't have any tours planned the dyno front hub has just been an option I've wanted for the future and the whole wheel upgrade was the perfect time for the "bank" to approve the process. ;-)
Trek_geek is offline  
Old 04-24-14, 10:28 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
a 32 hole F. 36 hole rear is a good combo, the weightog the rider is a bit more on the rear wheel anyhow..

check into a direct import of the rim from one of the popular European sellers mentioned here .
fietsbob is offline  
Old 04-27-14, 08:29 PM
  #18  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,210
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2735 Post(s)
Liked 969 Times in 792 Posts
Originally Posted by Trek_geek
WOW!!
All really good advice.

Yes I ride all year around, so the rear rim had two No. Virginia winters. They use quite a bit of both salt and sand on the roads and YES I hate the grinding sound the road slop causes. Until the hoses freeze up I try to rinse off the whole bike and both front and rear brake pads. Around here I even do it after a winter rain storm because the wet kicks up so much grit on the brakes. I also try a monthly full wash down including pulling the brake pads and cleaning out the bits and pieces of grit and aluminum. I have a "file card" with it's very fine, hard steel teeth that works great for that. I even swap my pads front to back to get more miles out of the set. I run 700x40 Clement X'plor MSO Adventure tires all winter with Planet Bike fenders so perhaps that contributes to the retention of the road grit on top of the pads

I am 6'3" and go about 210. Not a behemoth but not a light weight either.

I have emailed my shop to go with the 32 hole A719 if Mavic doesn't restock the 36. It has been a pain waiting but since I don't have any tours planned the dyno front hub has just been an option I've wanted for the future and the whole wheel upgrade was the perfect time for the "bank" to approve the process. ;-)
Certainly sounds like your riding conditions are just about the worst for rim life, that despite you trying your best to keep it clean. I know a fellow who rides a lot during the winter here in Montreal but at his work he can pull into an underground parking lot where there is even a hose and nozzle set up for the cyclists to clean off their bikes. I figure this is the only way not to do a number on rims with the salt and grit/sand.
I realize you have the 520 and arent likely to want to change it, but perhaps at some point if you keep on riding all year round, it really might make sense to go with a disk frame, or at least something to tempt you with at some point, given your riding conditions certainly fit the bill for the wear factor of rim brakes.
cheers
djb is offline  
Old 04-28-14, 07:20 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
robert schlatte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: columbus, ohio
Posts: 895

Bikes: Soma Saga, 1980 Schwinn Voyageur 11.8, New Albion Privateer

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
I agree 32hole front is fine. I ride year round as well. But I never ride my good bikes when it is sloppy out. The snow, grit, and salt corrode more than just your nice touring rims. The elements are also play hovoc on your drive train and other components. Get a beater bike for those nasty winter days. Your good bike will appreciate it.
robert schlatte is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liamof
Touring
5
10-13-13 12:19 AM
undogooder
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
23
07-30-11 11:47 AM
oneredstar
Touring
4
05-19-11 10:27 PM
leftthread
Classic & Vintage
45
11-03-10 09:36 PM
chico1st
Bicycle Mechanics
17
01-29-10 10:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.