Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Member 2WheelMotion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    My Bikes
    2002 Surly Instigator, 1999 Litepseed Blue Ridge, 1997 Trek Y-33, 1992 Schwinn 540
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Winwood CX fork v.s. steel or other

    Recently I noticed Winwood cyclocross forks with disc tabs...and eyelests for fenders...AND eyelets for a rack !?
    Hmm.... that might be a pretty sweet, shock absorbing ride.

    If you want to take a gander, www.spicercycles.com is carrying the fork with what looks like eyelets on the fork leg. I have seen the forks on cyclocross bikes in the store, and it looked like an eyelet at a casual glance. I'll have to really check it out next time.

    Pros:
    Shock absorption
    Light weight
    Stiff?
    Strength?

    Cons:
    Shock absorption
    - might not need shock absorption with 28c - 32c tires
    Light weight
    - really, who cares about 100 grams on a loaded tourer
    - is it gonna break?
    Eyelets in carbon fibre - will they hold up to a screw with a 10lb load and accelerated force over bumpy dirt roads?
    Flex - A cyclocross rider in the Cyclocross forum mentioned that he thought the forks were flexy under a strong braking force

    In the end, I might do better to stick with the old Kinesis (aluminum?) fork presently on the bike, or buy a Surly steel fork. I bet the Surly fork has eyelets for the rack.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The axle to crown length is long. It will change the geometry of bikes made for shorter forks.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,245
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When comparing weights, a lot of people consider a premium, racing style, all-carbon fork and compare it to a fairly cheap unicrown steel which is 1/4 the price.
    If you compare a generic low end carbon fork to a high-end custom steel fork, the price and weight are pretty evenly matched.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dougmt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Middle of Montana
    My Bikes
    1996 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went with the Surly 1x1 Fork. It does NOT have the upper braze ons for a rack, however, since I went with a disc brake I'm gonna convert the canti bosses into rack mounting points.
    D

  5. #5
    Member 2WheelMotion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    My Bikes
    2002 Surly Instigator, 1999 Litepseed Blue Ridge, 1997 Trek Y-33, 1992 Schwinn 540
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I noticed that spicercycles.com carries a few different steel and aluminum forks. They have forks for 26" and 700c wheels, including suspension-corrected rigid mtb forks. Their site includes titanium, aluminum, cromoly, and carbon forks. I didn't see any forks with eyelets for the rack, but many had eyelets on the drop-outs for fenders.

  6. #6
    Seen Your Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    128
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've got one (winwood cx), not flexy at all, has taken some serious hits & is holding up fine, i recommend it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •