Needing a smaller crankset than 44/33/22
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
But seriously. Throughout the trip all the way to the last 150 miles or so (the hardest) a major worry was my knees.
So even with mild climbs as soon as I felt any perceptible strain on them I would drop a gear, and shamelessly ended up grannying up even some relatively mild (but long) gradients.
A strange thing happened; I actually began to enjoy going uphill. At 5mph you see stuff you miss at 12 or 15. Of course I wouldn't want to do the WHOLE thing at that speed, but when I had cause to, I enjoyed it. I'm a big bird guy too (I even get paid for it sometimes) and I made several good sightings at that speed and, more to the point, could hear more species by their calls.
First time I walked was about 50 yard stretch on 303 crossing the Cuyahoga Valley in Ohio. I could have pedaled it, and was, but I was straining so hard standing on the pedals to do so that it occurred to me I could pull something and be grounded for days at least, or worse, mess up a knee.
Later on in New York I was miffed that I was not actually enjoying hills anymore, whereas I would if I had a lower gear to resort to.
Again, others' MMV
Mike
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Actually there was another worry too. In Ohio I actually pushed the bike across a steep-sided muddy stream where the bridge was out rather than take a dangerous, heavy-traffic/narrow winding road/no shoulder detour.
That was around Day 22. I made it out of the ditch but from then on in had some degree of lower back pain under load. Walking the bike up steep hills aggravated that condition. Pedalling - not so much.
Mike
#28
Banned
Done hills I would probably have needed a winch to pull me up the hill if I stayed on the bike..
Ft Augustus to Foyers on the south bank of Loch Ness , Scotland .. a prime example
Map:Stratherrick Loch Ness Map Walking Attractions Heritage Restaurants and More
Got to the top got a cuppa, (hot tea) in a concession trailer stayed the night on land surrounding their house , learned history of the area talking to them.
a memorable day.
Ft Augustus to Foyers on the south bank of Loch Ness , Scotland .. a prime example
Map:Stratherrick Loch Ness Map Walking Attractions Heritage Restaurants and More
Got to the top got a cuppa, (hot tea) in a concession trailer stayed the night on land surrounding their house , learned history of the area talking to them.
a memorable day.
Last edited by fietsbob; 08-10-14 at 10:28 AM.
#29
Senior Member
re knees and such, of course everyone is different and you have a lifetime of knee life different than my knees so knee issues are completely specific (past injury or whatever)
that said, as I am sure you are aware having biked 3000km, sometimes a very small change in seat position--front/back, up or down--can make a significant help to ones knees--ESPECIALLY when schlepping a heavy touring bike up hills and the gazillion of pedal revolutions in such a long trip.
just a thought and another consideration--- be absolutely certain that the setup of your bike is perfect, as in my experience small misadjustments will certainly strain knees, and very much will become evident pedalling a loaded touring bike. I have a knee that can get crotchety when overworked, and in the past (even recently) I've made some not so smart seat position changes that gave my knee grieve before I realized the folly of my ways. I should know better having ridden a fair amount, but still made the mistake.
ps, re pushing a bike, I too cant stand it and it takes way more out of me and my back than pedalling slowly. Havent had to do it in well over 20 yrs with a loaded bike, but certainly remember it.
that said, as I am sure you are aware having biked 3000km, sometimes a very small change in seat position--front/back, up or down--can make a significant help to ones knees--ESPECIALLY when schlepping a heavy touring bike up hills and the gazillion of pedal revolutions in such a long trip.
just a thought and another consideration--- be absolutely certain that the setup of your bike is perfect, as in my experience small misadjustments will certainly strain knees, and very much will become evident pedalling a loaded touring bike. I have a knee that can get crotchety when overworked, and in the past (even recently) I've made some not so smart seat position changes that gave my knee grieve before I realized the folly of my ways. I should know better having ridden a fair amount, but still made the mistake.
ps, re pushing a bike, I too cant stand it and it takes way more out of me and my back than pedalling slowly. Havent had to do it in well over 20 yrs with a loaded bike, but certainly remember it.
#30
Banned
May consider a Tadpole trike .. since Its hard to keep a 2 wheel bike up on a bike with a super low gear
Maybe a Sram dual drive hub in the rear wheel then what gear you have .. that 22t :34t .. will be x 0.73* of that (reduction gear within the hub's 3 speed
*0.472:1 ..
using shimano K.. 8 speed cassette
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]Low[/TH]
[TH]-[/TH]
[TH]High[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]67.1[/TH]
[TH]50.3[/TH]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]58.1[/TH]
[TH]43.6[/TH]
[TH]29.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.3[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.9[/TH]
[TH]34.4[/TH]
[TH]22.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]41.5[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[TH]20.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]37.9[/TH]
[TH]28.4[/TH]
[TH]19.0[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[TH]25.2[/TH]
[TH]16.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[TH]19.2[/TH]
[TH]12.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]91.4[/TH]
[TH]68.5[/TH]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]79.2[/TH]
[TH]59.4[/TH]
[TH]39.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]69.9[/TH]
[TH]52.4[/TH]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.5[/TH]
[TH]46.9[/TH]
[TH]31.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]56.6[/TH]
[TH]42.4[/TH]
[TH]28.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.7[/TH]
[TH]38.7[/TH]
[TH]25.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[TH]34.3[/TH]
[TH]22.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[TH]26.2[/TH]
[TH]17.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]124.5[/TH]
[TH]93.3[/TH]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]107.9[/TH]
[TH]80.9[/TH]
[TH]53.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]95.2[/TH]
[TH]71.4[/TH]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]85.2[/TH]
[TH]63.9[/TH]
[TH]42.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]77.1[/TH]
[TH]57.8[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]70.4[/TH]
[TH]52.8[/TH]
[TH]35.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[TH]46.7[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[TH]35.7[/TH]
[TH]23.8
[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Maybe a Sram dual drive hub in the rear wheel then what gear you have .. that 22t :34t .. will be x 0.73* of that (reduction gear within the hub's 3 speed
*0.472:1 ..
using shimano K.. 8 speed cassette
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]Low[/TH]
[TH]-[/TH]
[TH]High[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]67.1[/TH]
[TH]50.3[/TH]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]58.1[/TH]
[TH]43.6[/TH]
[TH]29.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.3[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.9[/TH]
[TH]34.4[/TH]
[TH]22.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]41.5[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[TH]20.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]37.9[/TH]
[TH]28.4[/TH]
[TH]19.0[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[TH]25.2[/TH]
[TH]16.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[TH]19.2[/TH]
[TH]12.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]91.4[/TH]
[TH]68.5[/TH]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]79.2[/TH]
[TH]59.4[/TH]
[TH]39.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]69.9[/TH]
[TH]52.4[/TH]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.5[/TH]
[TH]46.9[/TH]
[TH]31.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]56.6[/TH]
[TH]42.4[/TH]
[TH]28.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.7[/TH]
[TH]38.7[/TH]
[TH]25.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[TH]34.3[/TH]
[TH]22.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[TH]26.2[/TH]
[TH]17.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]124.5[/TH]
[TH]93.3[/TH]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]107.9[/TH]
[TH]80.9[/TH]
[TH]53.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]95.2[/TH]
[TH]71.4[/TH]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]85.2[/TH]
[TH]63.9[/TH]
[TH]42.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]77.1[/TH]
[TH]57.8[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]70.4[/TH]
[TH]52.8[/TH]
[TH]35.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[TH]46.7[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[TH]35.7[/TH]
[TH]23.8
[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Last edited by fietsbob; 08-11-14 at 03:32 PM.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: northeast GA, USA
Posts: 219
Bikes: Trek 820 Antelope (1992)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I would suggest doing the smaller chainring AND work on lightening your gear. Look at ultralight backpacking gear for tent, sleeping bag, pads, cooking gear. Minimize clothing.
The type of slopes you get into at the end of your tour are steep, even if they are short. However, I might suggest that it was at the end of a long tour and your condition at that stage of the tour may have low. Diet changes when on tour, caloric requirements get real high and if not met for a week or so can play havoc with your ability to put out the effort necessary to do the hills.
While our muscle mass gets bigger as the trip progresses, the ability of the body to drive those muscles diminishes if dietary needs are not met. I have seen lots of Appalachian Trail through hikers hit the wall three weeks into their hike because they were still eating as if they were at home, 2000 calories a day. They were burning 5000 calories a day at the level of activity the hike(or tour) demanded. You can only do that for a few weeks and then your body can't meet that demand any more. Occasional rest days and attention to diet can make a big difference.
The type of slopes you get into at the end of your tour are steep, even if they are short. However, I might suggest that it was at the end of a long tour and your condition at that stage of the tour may have low. Diet changes when on tour, caloric requirements get real high and if not met for a week or so can play havoc with your ability to put out the effort necessary to do the hills.
While our muscle mass gets bigger as the trip progresses, the ability of the body to drive those muscles diminishes if dietary needs are not met. I have seen lots of Appalachian Trail through hikers hit the wall three weeks into their hike because they were still eating as if they were at home, 2000 calories a day. They were burning 5000 calories a day at the level of activity the hike(or tour) demanded. You can only do that for a few weeks and then your body can't meet that demand any more. Occasional rest days and attention to diet can make a big difference.
Last edited by sedges; 08-10-14 at 10:57 AM.
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Your current crank will take a 20 tooth inner which cost about $25 with shipping on Fleabay. I would start there. mbtools (also on Flebay) sells individual 36, 38 and 41 teeth. While the 41 is probably too large for your current derailer, the derailer could be pushed to work with a 36 or 38. The jump from the next to the lowest to lowest gear would be larger but it's not that big and would work. Low gears should be considered bailout gears anyway.
Personally, I'd start with the 20 tooth inner rings. Paired with a 34 tooth cog, that will give you a 16" gear. I use that myself on my touring bike and it worked very well in Appalachia. I'm no spring chicken but I'm also not a weak rider. I also have no problem using very low gears in all kinds of situations...including touring. Machismo usually just means being dumb.
Personally, I'd start with the 20 tooth inner rings. Paired with a 34 tooth cog, that will give you a 16" gear. I use that myself on my touring bike and it worked very well in Appalachia. I'm no spring chicken but I'm also not a weak rider. I also have no problem using very low gears in all kinds of situations...including touring. Machismo usually just means being dumb.
I'm needing a new cassette anyway and will buy one with a 36 in back.
My feeling on the tour was I didn't need a huge step down in gear, just another gear below my present granny.
Mike
#33
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,091 Times
in
2,325 Posts
Just FYI, you may have trouble finding an 8 speed cassette with a 36 tooth cog. 10 speed are fairly easy but anything less isn't.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 570
Bikes: Hollands Touring Bike, Schwinn mountain bike, folding bike, tandem and triple
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use 94/58 cranks that permit me to use a 20 as a low ring, with the set 20-32-42 using a 12-36 cluster. So far, I have made it up everything with this combo, although I did have to stop and rest a bit on a very long, steep climb before continuing.
#35
Senior Member
May consider a Tadpole trike .. since Its hard to keep a 2 wheel bike up on a bike with a super low gear
Maybe a Sram dual drive hub in the rear wheel then what gear you have .. that 22t :34t .. will be x 0.73* of that (reduction gear within the hub's 3 speed
*0.472:1 ..
using shimano K.. 8 speed cassette
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]Low[/TH]
[TH]-[/TH]
[TH]High[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]67.1[/TH]
[TH]50.3[/TH]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]58.1[/TH]
[TH]43.6[/TH]
[TH]29.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.3[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.9[/TH]
[TH]34.4[/TH]
[TH]22.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]41.5[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[TH]20.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]37.9[/TH]
[TH]28.4[/TH]
[TH]19.0[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[TH]25.2[/TH]
[TH]16.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[TH]19.2[/TH]
[TH]12.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]91.4[/TH]
[TH]68.5[/TH]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]79.2[/TH]
[TH]59.4[/TH]
[TH]39.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]69.9[/TH]
[TH]52.4[/TH]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.5[/TH]
[TH]46.9[/TH]
[TH]31.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]56.6[/TH]
[TH]42.4[/TH]
[TH]28.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.7[/TH]
[TH]38.7[/TH]
[TH]25.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[TH]34.3[/TH]
[TH]22.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[TH]26.2[/TH]
[TH]17.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]124.5[/TH]
[TH]93.3[/TH]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]107.9[/TH]
[TH]80.9[/TH]
[TH]53.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]95.2[/TH]
[TH]71.4[/TH]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]85.2[/TH]
[TH]63.9[/TH]
[TH]42.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]77.1[/TH]
[TH]57.8[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]70.4[/TH]
[TH]52.8[/TH]
[TH]35.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[TH]46.7[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[TH]35.7[/TH]
[TH]23.8
[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Maybe a Sram dual drive hub in the rear wheel then what gear you have .. that 22t :34t .. will be x 0.73* of that (reduction gear within the hub's 3 speed
*0.472:1 ..
using shimano K.. 8 speed cassette
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]Low[/TH]
[TH]-[/TH]
[TH]High[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]67.1[/TH]
[TH]50.3[/TH]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]58.1[/TH]
[TH]43.6[/TH]
[TH]29.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.3[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.9[/TH]
[TH]34.4[/TH]
[TH]22.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]41.5[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[TH]20.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]37.9[/TH]
[TH]28.4[/TH]
[TH]19.0[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]33.5[/TH]
[TH]25.2[/TH]
[TH]16.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]25.6[/TH]
[TH]19.2[/TH]
[TH]12.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]91.4[/TH]
[TH]68.5[/TH]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]79.2[/TH]
[TH]59.4[/TH]
[TH]39.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]69.9[/TH]
[TH]52.4[/TH]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.5[/TH]
[TH]46.9[/TH]
[TH]31.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]56.6[/TH]
[TH]42.4[/TH]
[TH]28.3[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]51.7[/TH]
[TH]38.7[/TH]
[TH]25.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]45.7[/TH]
[TH]34.3[/TH]
[TH]22.8[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]34.9[/TH]
[TH]26.2[/TH]
[TH]17.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TH]124.5[/TH]
[TH]93.3[/TH]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]107.9[/TH]
[TH]80.9[/TH]
[TH]53.9[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]95.2[/TH]
[TH]71.4[/TH]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]85.2[/TH]
[TH]63.9[/TH]
[TH]42.6[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]77.1[/TH]
[TH]57.8[/TH]
[TH]38.5[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]70.4[/TH]
[TH]52.8[/TH]
[TH]35.2[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]62.2[/TH]
[TH]46.7[/TH]
[TH]31.1[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]47.6[/TH]
[TH]35.7[/TH]
[TH]23.8
[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
need the lower gears to drag the weight up the hills. I can see it being an advantage of the downhills and the flats though.
#36
Zen Master
Take a look at the TA Carmina Crankset. …as another possible option in the future. High quality stuff with a lot of flexibility. I believe there are also other TA cranks that will allow you to get down to a 20t inner chainring.
Don't let some of the ultralight tourers on this forum get to you. I was once an ultralight tourer myself (still kinda am on the trips where I'm riding my SuperSix) and know from my experience that we didn't all try to make others feel as they were doing something wrong if they weren't doing it like us.
Congrats on your tour and have fun planning your next one!
Don't let some of the ultralight tourers on this forum get to you. I was once an ultralight tourer myself (still kinda am on the trips where I'm riding my SuperSix) and know from my experience that we didn't all try to make others feel as they were doing something wrong if they weren't doing it like us.
Congrats on your tour and have fun planning your next one!
__________________
Ron - Tucson, AZ
Ron - Tucson, AZ
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,112
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3426 Post(s)
Liked 1,441 Times
in
1,122 Posts
A tadpole trike will be easier on the knees and obviously stable at low speeds, but I always wonder about the extra weight implicit in a trike and whether you basically just
need the lower gears to drag the weight up the hills. I can see it being an advantage of the downhills and the flats though.
need the lower gears to drag the weight up the hills. I can see it being an advantage of the downhills and the flats though.
#38
Banned
In a Velomobile shell you will fly by the wedgie bikes ... at higher speeds that you can sustain ..
22 to 20t aint much lower ..
plugged in the data to Sheldons math chart to show ' You want low ? 13" low enough?'
22 to 20t aint much lower ..
plugged in the data to Sheldons math chart to show ' You want low ? 13" low enough?'
#39
Senior Member
Take a look at the TA Carmina Crankset. …as another possible option in the future. High quality stuff with a lot of flexibility. I believe there are also other TA cranks that will allow you to get down to a 20t inner chainring.
#40
Zen Master
"Square taper" is an inexpensive, and typically very easily serviced (had one of mine adjusted by a chainsaw store once) bottom bracket; Nothing wrong with that. I agree the crankset is on the expensive end but it's a quality piece as well. Might be able to find one used, etc.
These days you can spin away with a pretty heavy load up just about any pass in the mountain west with a 22/36, so a 20/36 will be noticeably easier for the OP than what he has.
These days you can spin away with a pretty heavy load up just about any pass in the mountain west with a 22/36, so a 20/36 will be noticeably easier for the OP than what he has.
__________________
Ron - Tucson, AZ
Ron - Tucson, AZ
#41
Senior Member
"Square taper" is an inexpensive, and typically very easily serviced (had one of mine adjusted by a chainsaw store once) bottom bracket; Nothing wrong with that. I agree the crankset is on the expensive end but it's a quality piece as well. Might be able to find one used, etc.
These days you can spin away with a pretty heavy load up just about any pass in the mountain west with a 22/36, so a 20/36 will be noticeably easier for the OP than what he has.
These days you can spin away with a pretty heavy load up just about any pass in the mountain west with a 22/36, so a 20/36 will be noticeably easier for the OP than what he has.
#42
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,091 Times
in
2,325 Posts
I would suggest both reducing the load and reducing the gearing. They aren't mutually exclusive.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#43
Senior Member
You may want to reduce your load because it improves some aspect of your cycling experience but not all of us want to make the kind of sacrifices that come with carrying your kind of load.
I would suggest both reducing the load and reducing the gearing. They aren't mutually exclusive.
I would suggest both reducing the load and reducing the gearing. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Everyone's idea of comfort is different, but going down to 20lbs of gear I haven't experienced any less camping comfort than with the heavier loads I carried when I was younger.
#44
Senior Member
Yes, I agree. It is a personal preference thing, but I too definitely saw no loss of comfort at 20 pounds and still didn't when I went even lighter.
#45
Zen Master
Amazing that you two would agree! Really!
I happen to see no loss in comfort when I go from my current:
sport touring mode on my road bike
to my mountain bike, in backpacking mode (heavier)
to my loaded touring rig with 4 lightly loaded panniers (heavier)
and from that to the same bike loaded up to 100 pounds (heaviest)
...and climbing is a central component of my tours, the more the better.
If anything, those modes get more comfortable as I move down the list because each step gains some capability, as well as additional stability in descents.
I happen to see no loss in comfort when I go from my current:
sport touring mode on my road bike
to my mountain bike, in backpacking mode (heavier)
to my loaded touring rig with 4 lightly loaded panniers (heavier)
and from that to the same bike loaded up to 100 pounds (heaviest)
...and climbing is a central component of my tours, the more the better.
If anything, those modes get more comfortable as I move down the list because each step gains some capability, as well as additional stability in descents.
__________________
Ron - Tucson, AZ
Ron - Tucson, AZ
#46
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 799
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My non-indexing friction downtube shifters and the original rear derailleur coped with the switch from 7 speed freewheel to 8 speed cassette quite easily. Biggest change was limiting the range of the derailleur with the new cassette 700c rear wheel so it didn't go into the spokes.
I imagine it would work with a 10 speed too.
Mike
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Triangle, NC
Posts: 1,480
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 182 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While I truly appreciate all input I believe the "train harder/carry less/walking is fun" folks are missing an important point: Hills are why gears were invented in the first place.
I was not carrying a huge load, even by backpacking standards. If I was heading across West Texas where it can potentially be 50-90 miles between water sources an extra gallon or two of water would have made made my load heavier yet.
There is nothing wrong with the concept of cycling as effortlessly as possible, whatever ones' fitness level. That exact approach worked very well for me and I made that 2,000 miles at a pace right in there with the pack of posted bike tour accounts.
Clearly gearing down to the limits of rideability (3mph?) oughtta be an available option, possibly even lower for those on three wheeled recumbents and such.
Some hope tho'; turns out some of the newest mountain bikes have 11 speed cassettes that go to 42 teeth, but expensive and paired with single chainrings up front. But before too long the price will come down and folks will be matching them with paired chainrings if that is their preference.
Mike
I was not carrying a huge load, even by backpacking standards. If I was heading across West Texas where it can potentially be 50-90 miles between water sources an extra gallon or two of water would have made made my load heavier yet.
There is nothing wrong with the concept of cycling as effortlessly as possible, whatever ones' fitness level. That exact approach worked very well for me and I made that 2,000 miles at a pace right in there with the pack of posted bike tour accounts.
Clearly gearing down to the limits of rideability (3mph?) oughtta be an available option, possibly even lower for those on three wheeled recumbents and such.
Some hope tho'; turns out some of the newest mountain bikes have 11 speed cassettes that go to 42 teeth, but expensive and paired with single chainrings up front. But before too long the price will come down and folks will be matching them with paired chainrings if that is their preference.
Mike
The new XTR M9020 comes in a single chainring (30 is the lowest of several available), a double (34-24 is the lowest of several available) and a triple (40-30-22).....and an 11-40 rear cassette. I would look hard at the double ring arrangement as it provides a nice wide range without the idiosyncrasies of a triple ring set-up (although maybe this is no longer an potential issue). My advice is to go ahead and get a new bike with the XTR group. You will be good for the long haul.
#48
Senior Member
Re big big cassettes, 36 and whatnot, I'd still caution about getting some pretty big jumps between shifts, which in my opinion isn't great for the majority of the time you are riding. You'd have to compare your present cassette with potential new ones, obviously more so with 8 speed stuff.
#49
Senior Member
Re big big cassettes, 36 and whatnot, I'd still caution about getting some pretty big jumps between shifts, which in my opinion isn't great for the majority of the time you are riding. You'd have to compare your present cassette with potential new ones, obviously more so with 8 speed stuff.
#50
Senior Member
I know there is a nice 12-30 ten speed with 12, 13,14,15, 17, 19, 21, 24, 27, 30. I use a 12-27 nine speed and really like the 12,13,14,15 closeness, then the 2 t difference for three shifts is nice. This 12-30 is the same but with the added 30. I would see this as a great cassette with a mtn bike crank of 44/32/22 or 20 for heavy loaded touring in really steep stuff and would allow a low of about 18g.i.
I know this fellow isnt going 10 speed, so my concern was more for a 8 speed cassette (of which he doesnt use the smallest cog) that might have some pretty big 20% + jumps between shifts.
Im firmly in the believe that even more so with loaded touring, having a closer ratio cassette is way better and more important than on an unloaded bike. Working with all the weight on a bike, having close shifts makes it a lot easier on the knees and muscles.
11-36 sram 10 speed 11 13 15 17 19 21 24 28 32 36
Here is the specs for a 26in 1.9in wheeled ten speed setup with a mtn crank and a 12-30 ten speed with nice jumps. Guess I'd have to get over that ten speed is fragile or whatever before going this. If I went 9 speed, I'd use a 11-32 which is commonly available.
[TABLE="class: tablebody"]
[TR]
[TD="class: tabhead"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"]
[TABLE="class: tablebody"]
[TR]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"]
[TABLE="class: tablebody"]
[TR]
[TD="class: tabhead"]
[/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
I know this fellow isnt going 10 speed, so my concern was more for a 8 speed cassette (of which he doesnt use the smallest cog) that might have some pretty big 20% + jumps between shifts.
Im firmly in the believe that even more so with loaded touring, having a closer ratio cassette is way better and more important than on an unloaded bike. Working with all the weight on a bike, having close shifts makes it a lot easier on the knees and muscles.
11-36 sram 10 speed 11 13 15 17 19 21 24 28 32 36
Here is the specs for a 26in 1.9in wheeled ten speed setup with a mtn crank and a 12-30 ten speed with nice jumps. Guess I'd have to get over that ten speed is fragile or whatever before going this. If I went 9 speed, I'd use a 11-32 which is commonly available.
[TABLE="class: tablebody"]
[TR]
[TD="class: tabhead"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"]
[TABLE="class: tablebody"]
[TR]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"]
[TABLE="class: tablebody"]
[TR]
[TD="class: tabhead"]
[/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: tabcell, align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Last edited by djb; 08-16-14 at 09:21 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WNCGoater
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
52
01-01-18 06:45 PM