Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Tried out a Rivendell today...

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Tried out a Rivendell today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-15, 06:34 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 157

Bikes: They have two wheels!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 7 Posts
I rode around on a Hunquapillar for a bit. It rode a lot like a bike. That was my impression.

I am a Riv fan. I think the bikes are great looking, I like Grant's bike philosophy, I love that they've pushed reasonable tire clearances into the mainstream. The fact that the bikes are relatively expensive is what it is. I bike almost exclusively. A 2,000$ bike is a good chunk of change, but if that $ gets me a bike that I'm excited to ride daily, and does what I want it to well, then I'd be ok saving up for it.

An off the peg hybrid could probably give me a similar ride, and perform it's job as well, but it wouldn't likely have the same, lasting, allure.
vaultbrad is offline  
Old 03-26-15, 07:59 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mdilthey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,923

Bikes: Nature Boy 853 Disc, Pugsley SS

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sam_cyclist
This seems like a thinly veiled hit piece against rivendell masquerading as a "cool, I test rode a rivendell!" post.
And my motivations are... young upstart wants to stick it to old-fashioned bike building?
mdilthey is offline  
Old 03-26-15, 09:58 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 800
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Maybe it's me, but they don't seem overly expensive for what they are....semi custom, hand built frames (in Asia I get it). From what I have seen, they are better built than most and one could easily spend 2x for a custom handbuilt.

I like his methodology, it's over the top at times, almost trying to play into the anti-carbon thing too much....but he's spot on with a lot of his comments.

I always liken Riv to Whole Foods...you spend more money for the same thing you could get someplace else, but, you can walk in and pick anything off the shelf and know it's going to be healthy, fairly environmentally friendly and work well. He tries for US made, which I respect, pushes the boundaries with clothing design and gives honest reviews of the hardparts he sells.

Bottom line, ride your bike, be comfortable, don't worry about latest fads, be durable and have some style while your at it....I think we can all agree with that!
nickw is offline  
Old 03-26-15, 11:38 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
Originally Posted by nun
Rivendell has always advocated large tire clearances and that's something the rest of the industry is now adopting.
Surly has done that since day one as well.
Leebo is offline  
Old 03-26-15, 01:59 PM
  #30  
nun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670

Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 40 Posts
I have issues with lots of what Petersen doles out, but he is consistent and a very early adopter of a philosophy that goes against the bike race culture. His time at Bridgestone produced some interesting bikes. I think Surly came along a bit after that. Personally I find the extremes of pure race technology and Petersen retro equally frustrating. That's why I like modern CF endurance and adventure bikes, the best if both worlds. Strength and weight advantages of carbon and modern stems an bottom bracket shells, big tire clearances, relaxed geometries
nun is offline  
Old 03-26-15, 05:01 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by nun
I have issues with lots of what Petersen doles out, but he is consistent and a very early adopter of a philosophy that goes against the bike race culture. His time at Bridgestone produced some interesting bikes. I think Surly came along a bit after that. Personally I find the extremes of pure race technology and Petersen retro equally frustrating. That's why I like modern CF endurance and adventure bikes, the best if both worlds. Strength and weight advantages of carbon and modern stems an bottom bracket shells, big tire clearances, relaxed geometries
you are soooo sensible.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 05:57 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 839
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by mdilthey
A Rivendell rolled into the shop. I gave it a spin (with permission from the mechanic). My thoughts:

1. Wow. So much flex. Great for riding on pavement at low speeds. Seems poor for sprinting, cranking up a hill, etc. Mine even had a double top tube, but the flex in the threaded stem, the frame, and the fork was pretty noticeably loose. I think the threaded stem was the main culprit.

2. Beautiful. Breathtaking lugwork and paint, and decals, and everything.

3. Comfy. The combo of the flex with the tires made it feel as smooth as butter. I could sit all day in the saddle. Unfortunately, my riding often includes biking activities other than just sitting in the saddle, piddling along.


So, overall, I admire the craftsmanship, but I'm glad I didn't save up for one sight unseen. I'm sure the Riv guys can custom-build frames with different specifications.

And #1 biggest takeaway: Long Live the Threadless Headset.
Your "review" sounds like it came straight from Bicycling Magazine. It's amazing how many opinions you've formed and assumptions you've made based on a quick spin. All you did was rehash a bunch of stereotypes:

This bike is for old retro grouches who ride slowly.

Disclaimer: I've never ridden a Rivendell and I own and ride bikes with threaded and threadless headsets.
niknak is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 06:49 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mdilthey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,923

Bikes: Nature Boy 853 Disc, Pugsley SS

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by niknak
Your "review" sounds like it came straight from Bicycling Magazine. It's amazing how many opinions you've formed and assumptions you've made based on a quick spin. All you did was rehash a bunch of stereotypes:

This bike is for old retro grouches who ride slowly.

Disclaimer: I've never ridden a Rivendell and I own and ride bikes with threaded and threadless headsets.
It wasn't a review. I didn't say "old" or "retro" or "grouches" and a set of handlebars with a full inch and a half of play under force is pretty easy to identify as "flexy."

The real problem here:

A) You confused my casual 1-ride opinion for a review.

B) You can't escape your preconceptions about what you think I think.
mdilthey is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 08:24 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 839
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by mdilthey
I don't dislike the aesthetic at all. As someone noticeably detached from the generation these bikes market to (or harken back to, at least), I still admired the bike and the craftsmanship, from design to paint.

That said, the noodly feeling in the frame didn't inspire me. It's a bike for a different rider. And some choices, like the quill stem, are antiquated for a reason. It might look like the bike you had in 1975, but that doesn't mean it's the "right" way of doing
I used the word review in quotes because you're right it wasn't a review. It was like a review but with no substance. And even though you didn't use the words old and retro grouches you implied them with your trite remarks. IF I were you I'd save my opinions for when they're backed by something more than marketing gibberish. For instance, quill stems are by no means antiquated. just because the pro peloton doesn't use them today doesn't mean they're an inferior connection between handlebars and headset.
niknak is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 10:14 AM
  #35  
Jedi Master
 
kingston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lake Forest, IL
Posts: 3,724

Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1759 Post(s)
Liked 488 Times in 313 Posts
@mdilthey: I appreciate the post. While your experience with threaded stems is inconsistent with mine, all any of us can do is share our experiences. I have bikes with both threaded and threadless stems and don't notice a bit of difference in the stiffness of either, but there is no risk of anyone calling me fast. I think the Sam Hillborne is a great frame, but I also realize that it's not going to work for everyone.
kingston is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 10:27 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NH
Posts: 1,015
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 318 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 82 Posts
Originally Posted by mdilthey
And some choices, like the quill stem, are antiquated for a reason.
???

Flex was never an issue with my Bruce Gordon quill stem. They are still made to be used with his Rock & Road. I've replaced my original "Chicken Neck" stem with a clamp on, threadless design just to tweak my fit but it is still attached to a quill adapter into the frame.

https://www.bgcycles.com/new-page-5/

Last edited by BobG; 03-30-15 at 11:24 AM. Reason: change wording
BobG is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 10:28 AM
  #37  
In the wind
 
mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 1,338

Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Team, Lemond Buenos Aires, Giant TCX, Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Liked 120 Times in 54 Posts
I think the people claiming that threaded stems don't flex any more than threadless probably don't ride in such a way that flex would be an issue.
I love the look of the stems on my Miyata and Lemond bikes, but when I stand and hammer, particularly when in the drops, I can notice the difference. YMMV
mercator is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 02:10 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NH
Posts: 1,015
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 318 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 82 Posts
^^^
Exactly. I never hammer on a touring bike so even if my quill stem has some flex it would never be noticed.

I'm wondering if the flex noticed by Max originated from the tall aluminum riser on the Nitto stems typically used by Rivendell. The BG stems are chrome moly, have short risers and height is achieved by the angle of the horizontal section.

Nitto- https://goo.gl/LSojPN

BG- https://goo.gl/7YLRv2

Last edited by BobG; 03-30-15 at 02:17 PM.
BobG is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 02:20 PM
  #39  
nun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670

Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 40 Posts
This sort of sums it up for me. Retro is nice, but........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZbVsrYPOGE
nun is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 02:34 PM
  #40  
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by mdilthey
I don't dislike the aesthetic at all. As someone noticeably detached from the generation these bikes market to (or harken back to, at least), I still admired the bike and the craftsmanship, from design to paint.

That said, the noodly feeling in the frame didn't inspire me. It's a bike for a different rider. And some choices, like the quill stem, are antiquated for a reason. It might look like the bike you had in 1975, but that doesn't mean it's the "right" way of doing things.

Nobody uses leather chamois anymore. We've moved forward.
I would say more backward, racing to the bottom. If you've never ridden a really nice pair of leather chamois shorts that's a shame.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 03:04 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 185

Bikes: 4

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FrenchFit
I would say more backward, racing to the bottom. If you've never ridden a really nice pair of leather chamois shorts that's a shame.
+1

Max the Blogger is just troll'in...

Indirect disparagement of some else's preferences in (bikes, cars, audio equipment, indie bands, politicians, girlfriends etc.) is just a shallow attempt to validate one's own preferences.

Chances are it's not stem flex that's holding anyone back...
headset is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 03:08 PM
  #42  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mdilthey
2. Beautiful. Breathtaking lugwork and paint, and decals, and everything.
I bought my All Rounder used after getting hit by a plumbing van and destroying my Cross Check. Before I plunked down the cash, I took a test ride and stopped at my house. My wife looked at the Joe Bell paint and said I should buy it.

Mine is a little flexy when I stand up and try to hammer up a hill. Luckily I replaced the 53/39 with a triple so I can stay seated.
Eaton is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 04:23 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by headset
+1

Max the Blogger is just troll'in...

Indirect disparagement of some else's preferences in (bikes, cars, audio equipment, indie bands, politicians, girlfriends etc.) is just a shallow attempt to validate one's own preferences.

Chances are it's not stem flex that's holding anyone back...
preference is impossible without direct or implied disparagement.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 04:53 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Geez, so,the OP takes a ride on a bike and finds it wanting. Finds the threaded headset & quill stem wanting. From there replys spiral downward as if the OP disparaged their mother and suggested she choose an undesirable occupation! Geez folks, its a bike, get over it. So he doesn't like a bike style that you favor, no need for name calling and bottom feeding. I have far more respect for him then the replys.
VT_Speed_TR is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 05:39 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by niknak
I used the word review in quotes because you're right it wasn't a review. It was like a review but with no substance. And even though you didn't use the words old and retro grouches you implied them with your trite remarks. IF I were you I'd save my opinions for when they're backed by something more than marketing gibberish. For instance, quill stems are by no means antiquated. just because the pro peloton doesn't use them today doesn't mean they're an inferior connection between handlebars and headset.
I just can't stand posters like OP. They take a totally passive aggressive approach in stating their opinions.

He obviously hates rivendells and has a weight weenie technophile bias but is afraid to say so, because he doesn't want to be criticized himself for his own biases.
sam_cyclist is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 05:41 PM
  #46  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VT_Speed_TR
Geez, so,the OP takes a ride on a bike and finds it wanting. Finds the threaded headset & quill stem wanting. From there replys spiral downward as if the OP disparaged their mother and suggested she choose an undesirable occupation! Geez folks, its a bike, get over it. So he doesn't like a bike style that you favor, no need for name calling and bottom feeding. I have far more respect for him then the replys.
I don't favor rivendells. I don't have much interest in buying one and from a strictly esthetic perspective, I don't care much for how they look.

I just can't stand passive aggressive posters who have very clear biases but refuse to state them or even acknowledge them, pretend to be objective, and act as if they are enthusiastically passing along information about a test ride.
sam_cyclist is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 05:49 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
I'm bemused by the level of negative attention Riv bikes get on BF. Grant Peterson's design choices reflect a strong aesthetic that you can agree or disagree with but there are reasons for those choices. There are advantages to threadless but I doubt the advantages have much to do with one's subjective feelings about how they feel when you pull on them. In any case, the guys and galls who sprinted on quill stems did just fine. The real advantage is not a subjective feeling but the ease in changing bars and the ease of adjusting the headset (plus the dang thing doesn't slip out of adjustment). Those are pretty clear advantages. The disadvantage has to do with height adjustability. But if you want to focus on subjective feelings after taking a bike for a short ride around the block, don't be surprised if you get some pushback from people who have equally strong subjective feelings and did more than just ride their Riv around the block.

Sorry I like a lot of the OP's posts and reviews (and I have read quite a few of them) but this one, IMHO, falls short.
bikemig is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 06:05 PM
  #48  
nun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670

Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by sam_cyclist
I don't favor rivendells. I don't have much interest in buying one and from a strictly esthetic perspective, I don't care much for how they look.

I just can't stand passive aggressive posters who have very clear biases but refuse to state them or even acknowledge them, pretend to be objective, and act as if they are enthusiastically passing along information about a test ride.
Take opinions and preferences at their face value.....and just relax a bit.
nun is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 06:12 PM
  #49  
nun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670

Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
I'm bemused by the level of negative attention Riv bikes get on BF. Grant Peterson's design choices reflect a strong aesthetic that you can agree or disagree with but there are reasons for those choices. There are advantages to threadless but I doubt the advantages have much to do with one's subjective feelings about how they feel when you pull on them. In any case, the guys and galls who sprinted on quill stems did just fine. The real advantage is not a subjective feeling but the ease in changing bars and the ease of adjusting the headset (plus the dang thing doesn't slip out of adjustment). Those are pretty clear advantages. The disadvantage has to do with height adjustability. But if you want to focus on subjective feelings after taking a bike for a short ride around the block, don't be surprised if you get some pushback from people who have equally strong subjective feelings and did more than just ride their Riv around the block.

Sorry I like a lot of the OP's posts and reviews (and I have read quite a few of them) but this one, IMHO, falls short.
People get irrationally intense sometimes. I have Rivendells, but ride a modern CF bike most of the time because it is lighter, faster and I feel less tired at the end of a long ride when I ride it than on a Rivendell. I use the Rivendells when it's wet or in the winter because they have clearance for big tires and fenders, they look nice, but are no where near as good for climbing or long days in the saddle as my Cervelo RS, IMHO. Grant Petersen says a lot of stuff I agree with and a lot of stuff that I don't agree with, I don't lose sleep over that. He makes nice bikes that some people like more than me and some a lot less. I like my CF bike best for summer on road riding and touring. I'm sure other will have differing opinions and they are welcome to them, and are welcome to voice them.
nun is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 06:15 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nun
Take opinions and preferences at their face value.....and just relax a bit.
Dude, don't tell me or anyone else to relax. Just state your own opinion and move on. Thanks.
sam_cyclist is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.