Search
Notices
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Trek T1 vs. Felt TK2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-09, 11:53 PM
  #1  
nom nom nom
Thread Starter
 
Frunkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096

Bikes: Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek T1 vs. Felt TK2

Yep, another compare bikes/omg what bike should I get thread(!). Basically I need a track bike. I'm doing most of my racing in Kenosha, with a few in T-Town. I can get both of these bikes at EP so I don't really need other suggestions. I'm like 6'3 and race 3's on the road if that matters at all.

The Felt is going to come in a little more expensive, but are the components worth it? I definitely like the stock wheels on the felt better, along with the crank set.

And geometry? I don't know much about geometry, but I want more of an all-rounder. Sprint events, pursuits, whatever. Is one of these set up a little better for that?

I know that I can't really go wrong with either one, but I don't want to spend more than I have to, or not spend enough, and be able to tell.
Frunkin is offline  
Old 05-08-09, 03:35 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 205

Bikes: Cervelo R3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride a Trek T1, got a good deal on ebay, but I have a bias for Felt. I am fairly new to track, but for 2009, the clear winner is Felt. I just looked at the specs and all the disadvantages it had, are no longer an issue. The geometry differences are insignificant for your needs.
borg is offline  
Old 05-08-09, 06:42 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: over by there
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd go with the Felt, but I'm also biased as I have the '09 TK2. The Felt seems to be the bike of choice at the Superdrome as I've seen probably a dozen '09s out there so far this year.

Not to take anything away from the Trek as I have a teammate that runs one and does quite well with it, though I think he's upgraded it so only the frame is "stock" at this point.
mocella is offline  
Old 05-08-09, 07:01 AM
  #4  
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,586

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
I have a Felt, but if you're looking for an all-arounder I'd go for the Trek. I don't know the geometry off the top of my head but if I recall correctly the Trek is a bit more middle-of-the-road, whereas the Felt has tight, steep, sprint geometry, very short wheelbase.
queerpunk is offline  
Old 05-08-09, 09:58 AM
  #5  
not actually Nickatina
 
andre nickatina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 4,447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Felt really stepped it up nicely on the TK2 for '09.
andre nickatina is offline  
Old 05-11-09, 07:36 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The T1 wasn't designed just for the track. It's primary function is for the road.

The Felt on the other hand is just the opposite. It's super racy, nice and stiff, and fast.

If you want a bike you can ride to the track, take the brake off and race, the T1 is your beat. If you want a bike you could take all the way to Natz, get the TK2.

Before I bought my Teschner, I had one of the older TK2s. Wish I never sold it.
PltJett is offline  
Old 05-11-09, 12:26 PM
  #7  
nom nom nom
Thread Starter
 
Frunkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096

Bikes: Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok, well I didn't buy anything yet, but I realized that I'm kind of broke. How about the TK3? The general consensus is for the felt, so where does the cheaper one slot in?
Frunkin is offline  
Old 05-11-09, 08:26 PM
  #8  
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
bonechilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PltJett
The T1 wasn't designed just for the track. It's primary function is for the road.
What makes you say that? The geometry and components of the bike are pure "track," and I don't believe that it so much as ships with pedals or a front brake. It is, in every way, a track bike.
bonechilling is offline  
Old 05-13-09, 03:57 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PltJett
The T1 wasn't designed just for the track. It's primary function is for the road.
That's a dumb thing to say. According to your logic, a 75 degree head angle and a 74 degree seat angle are meant for the road. However, those are the same angles as the TK2.

The T1 comes with a size specific HA of between 74 and 75 degrees and a SA between 75.5 and 74.
The TK2 has a 75 HA and a 74 HA regardless of the size.

The T1 has chainstays from 38.5 to 38.8
The TK2 has 38.5 chainstays regardless of size

The T1 comes in 7 sizes from 50cm to 62cm
The TK2 is in only 5 sizes from 52cm to 60cm

Overall, the geometry is nearly identical, if not better for track racing. The T1's also have a slightly shorter top tube than the TK2.

Oh yeah, the T1 is made in the USA, unlike the TK2
oldfolksmashers is offline  
Old 05-14-09, 03:13 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 205

Bikes: Cervelo R3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am glad we have a general consensus on the Trek T1 being a true track frame. I was wondering why someone thought is was more of a fixed road bike.
borg is offline  
Old 06-22-09, 07:48 PM
  #11  
everyone has a plan...
 
sleazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: planet earth
Posts: 541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
+1 for the felt.

no direct comparo with the Trek- but i am thoroughly impressed with mine. they sorted ALL the details.

crank, BB, chainrings, axles, fork, geometry, hbars...

they did their homework.
sleazy is offline  
Old 06-22-09, 10:02 PM
  #12  
G60
Senior Member
 
G60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 545
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by borg
I was wondering why someone thought is was more of a fixed road bike.
because of the name on the downtube.
G60 is offline  
Old 11-11-09, 03:18 PM
  #13  
Cat 666
 
fatallightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: nyack, ny (yes, that one)
Posts: 1,462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oldfolksmashers
That's a dumb thing to say. According to your logic, a 75 degree head angle and a 74 degree seat angle are meant for the road. However, those are the same angles as the TK2.

The T1 comes with a size specific HA of between 74 and 75 degrees and a SA between 75.5 and 74.
The TK2 has a 75 HA and a 74 HA regardless of the size.

The T1 has chainstays from 38.5 to 38.8
The TK2 has 38.5 chainstays regardless of size

The T1 comes in 7 sizes from 50cm to 62cm
The TK2 is in only 5 sizes from 52cm to 60cm

Overall, the geometry is nearly identical, if not better for track racing. The T1's also have a slightly shorter top tube than the TK2.

Oh yeah, the T1 is made in the USA, unlike the TK2
quick bump, only because im shopping for a used t1 for a good deal. the 2010 looks to be a downgrade. crappier crank, i think the frame is overseas now, alpha black.
fatallightning is offline  
Old 11-12-09, 07:03 AM
  #14  
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
bonechilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, it really sucks about the new crank, but at least it doesn't come with those ****ty pair-spoke wheels and a hub with no lockring. I'm not sure about the made in the US thing, they never really advertised it on the bikes pre-2009 (which was a shame and a poor marketing decision).

Also, I'm still laughing about the guy who said that the T1 is a road bike.
bonechilling is offline  
Old 11-16-09, 11:22 PM
  #15  
nom nom nom
Thread Starter
 
Frunkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096

Bikes: Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I got a Fuji Track Pro used. The end.
Frunkin is offline  
Old 11-18-09, 08:57 AM
  #16  
fair weather cyclist
 
pjcampbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Green Mountains
Posts: 1,368

Bikes: Colnago c50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
What about the Motobecane with Dura Ace cranks.

https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...team_track.htm

Seems to be an older Fuji Track Pro. As far as I see the T1 is not really in the same league as TK2, although the price difference will buy you some decent wheels. I am considering TK2, Jamis Sonik (with American Racing wheels) or Giant Omnium, and also considering the Motobecane although not sure about it yet... maybe even the Trek?
pjcampbell is offline  
Old 11-25-09, 06:01 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 160

Bikes: 2005 Felt CA-1, 2006 Bianchi Pista Concept, 2007 Pinarello Galileo, 2007 Trek T1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The pre-2010 T1's had a fairly decent wheelset. I don't know where you come off as calling them "*****ty" but I've owned the pair spoked wheels on both the T1 and on my Felt road bike. The wheels are strong and I have yet to true the wheels. No spokes have been broken either.

Add to that, the T1 is by far comparable to a road bike. Compared to my Pista Concept, the Concept seems more aggressive and the T1 seems more forgiving on the road.

The Concept is riding on Cane Creek Volos (Tubulars)
THe T1 is riding on Bontrager Track (Clinchers)
kmoy2002 is offline  
Old 11-26-09, 11:25 PM
  #18  
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
bonechilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Any Bontrager paired spoke-wheel that is used often enough will crack where the eyelets should be. Ask anyone who works for a Trek dealer and they'll tell you about replacing fifty rear wheels per year (or 200+, as my shop has done). Also, paired spoke technology has been pretty well dismissed for any meaningful aerodynamic benefit. Both of these reasons are why Trek will no longer be selling wheels like this.

Just because the T1 doesn't use the classic (some say outdated) 76°/76° sprint geometry of the Pista Concept, that doesn't mean it's a not a track bike. I don't own one, but I know more than a handful of riders who are racing them for the U23 team in Belgium at this moment, along with countless others who use theirs at velodromes in the US and around the world. Whether or not you find your T1 more "forgiving" than your Concept is irrelevant, it's a 100% legit track bike.
bonechilling is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 08:50 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 136

Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Schwinn Continental II

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PltJett
The T1 wasn't designed just for the track. It's primary function is for the road
I'm planning on buying a Felt myself. The fact that the T1 comes with a fixed/ free rear hub makes me want to steer clear of it. It's primary function may not be the road but it definatly is'nt the track either. get a Felt Tk3 for around the same price.
coolkid_cody is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 11:42 PM
  #20  
nom nom nom
Thread Starter
 
Frunkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096

Bikes: Lemond Tete de Course, Slingshot DDX, Fuji Track Pro, Surly Steamroller

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Yep. Only for the road. Not the track. And definitely not a 6 day. Not here. No way.
Frunkin is offline  
Old 12-21-09, 09:14 AM
  #21  
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
bonechilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yep, definitely a road bike!

bonechilling is offline  
Old 12-21-09, 09:43 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
z415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343

Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There were a few years that the T1 came with ergo road drop bars, at least according to the one in the store and the pic on the website....
z415 is offline  
Old 12-21-09, 10:34 AM
  #23  
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757

Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times in 431 Posts


You guys are all wrong. This!!!! ^^^^^
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Track.jpg (41.1 KB, 85 views)
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Old 12-22-09, 04:49 PM
  #24  
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
bonechilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by z415
There were a few years that the T1 came with ergo road drop bars, at least according to the one in the store and the pic on the website....
What on earth does this even mean?
bonechilling is offline  
Old 01-04-10, 09:33 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 160

Bikes: 2005 Felt CA-1, 2006 Bianchi Pista Concept, 2007 Pinarello Galileo, 2007 Trek T1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Any Bontrager paired spoke-wheel that is used often enough will crack where the eyelets should be. Ask anyone who works for a Trek dealer and they'll tell you about replacing fifty rear wheels per year (or 200+, as my shop has done). Also, paired spoke technology has been pretty well dismissed for any meaningful aerodynamic benefit. Both of these reasons are why Trek will no longer be selling wheels like this.

Just because the T1 doesn't use the classic (some say outdated) 76°/76° sprint geometry of the Pista Concept, that doesn't mean it's a not a track bike. I don't own one, but I know more than a handful of riders who are racing them for the U23 team in Belgium at this moment, along with countless others who use theirs at velodromes in the US and around the world. Whether or not you find your T1 more "forgiving" than your Concept is irrelevant, it's a 100% legit track bike.
Reading comprehension helps...I never stated that the T1 was not a track bike. Quite the opposite if you read my post correctly.
kmoy2002 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.