Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Junior Member ponyyyyyyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    building new for the track
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    stem engineering

    I've got an interesting question and sorry if it sounds immature or just plain dumb. What makes a stem so complicated? I mean certain components I can understand the variety in price and performance, but I just don't understand the affected performance improvements of a $200 stem over a $20 stem. I can go as far as understand possibly weight shavings, especially those with a longer reach who can benefit a weight shaving at 140mm. Now I know material will have price variances, but in the end, what mechanics does a stem provide that would persuade your wallet. Is it stiffness? Looks? Weight? Name? Build quality? Don't mean to be ig'nant just want to know as I'm looking to purchase a new stem.

    edit: also what's the difference between a 'track' stem vs. a 'road' stem? is there?
    Last edited by ponyyyyyyy; 04-19-11 at 08:47 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Historically a lot of track bikes had very road like geometry, with longish headtubes. So to get riders down low enough, 'track' stems had more drop on them (like -10deg) or more.

    Today a lot of track bikes are built with really short headtubes (so people can pursuit on them as well), and accordingly you don't need the stem to make the drop work. In fact a lot of bikes, like pretty much every BT will use a stem flipped up.

    Past that stems are stems and just like any other bike component you pay for weight, stiffness, material and the name on it. Is that 100g ultraliteweight carbon stem any better than a 200g Thomson that will last forever? Depends how much that 100g means to you. Same with the brand really.

    But in terms of your question is there any magical engineering in there? Not really.

  3. #3
    Senior Member orionz06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As an engineer looking at a stem, there is very little that needs to be done to analyze it in a large company. What loads and criteria it needs to meet are set, the rest is just optimization and physical testing to match the analysis. The short version... Stems cost $200 because people pay $200.

  4. #4
    Junior Member ponyyyyyyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    building new for the track
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ah, that is quite interesting. yeah right now, 100g is not worth the $200, especially when I can save it elsewhere for cheaper. Thanks.

    actually another interesting question, is there a difference between 2-bolt face plate vs 4? other than the obvious? should I exclusively trust a 4-bolt face?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Kayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    1,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any time one metal thing clamps to another you need to make sure the clamp is smooth and round. There are two parts that do that on a stem, and in pretty high stress areas. Also one half of a stem pulls on the other in a bad way. So with a good stem you will get a better clamping interface, and better tolerence of the forces(stiffness, sort of).

  6. #6
    Senior Member orionz06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ponyyyyyyy View Post
    ah, that is quite interesting. yeah right now, 100g is not worth the $200, especially when I can save it elsewhere for cheaper. Thanks.

    actually another interesting question, is there a difference between 2-bolt face plate vs 4? other than the obvious? should I exclusively trust a 4-bolt face?
    That is not to say that a $20 stem is just as good.

    For the number of bolts, I would prefer a 4 bolt as there is a better chance of the pressure on the bar-stem interface being even, and as a result the reaction forces also even. I have no numbers and no calculations, or evidence for that matter, but my gut feel is that when we see broken CF handlebars, some of it may have to do with an uneven clamping force.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •