Ask your small, random, track-related questions here
#2001
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 740
Bikes: T1, S2, P3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What timing systems are people using out there at their tracks? We bring out the physical loops that we tape down but we do not leave it out and apparently didn't have the foresight to make it permanent.
Is there an IR/beacon system out there? Something that grabs a transponder as it goes by? I used something like this in my race car a few years ago but it was a little bulky.
Is there an IR/beacon system out there? Something that grabs a transponder as it goes by? I used something like this in my race car a few years ago but it was a little bulky.
#2002
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 46
Bikes: Dolan Pre Cursa, Felt F15X
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Doing my first race on a 333 track this weekend (have previously only raced on a 400). One of the events is a flying 200. As I'm used to it, I would basically dive out of the top of turn 2 towards the 200 meter line, which was between turn 2 and 3, and then ride the line from there on out.
Any basic advice for a flying 200 on a 333 track?
Thanks!
Any basic advice for a flying 200 on a 333 track?
Thanks!
#2003
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
What timing systems are people using out there at their tracks? We bring out the physical loops that we tape down but we do not leave it out and apparently didn't have the foresight to make it permanent.
Is there an IR/beacon system out there? Something that grabs a transponder as it goes by? I used something like this in my race car a few years ago but it was a little bulky.
Is there an IR/beacon system out there? Something that grabs a transponder as it goes by? I used something like this in my race car a few years ago but it was a little bulky.
At DLV a volunteer has been building a timing strip system using Arduinos that's he's been maturing over the last 3 years. We've even laid underground cabling for his system. It's very mature now.
Doing my first race on a 333 track this weekend (have previously only raced on a 400). One of the events is a flying 200. As I'm used to it, I would basically dive out of the top of turn 2 towards the 200 meter line, which was between turn 2 and 3, and then ride the line from there on out.
Any basic advice for a flying 200 on a 333 track?
Thanks!
Any basic advice for a flying 200 on a 333 track?
Thanks!
Advice: Get there early and ask a couple of locals about how many laps you get during the windup, the line to take, and when to accelerate. It's a common mistake for visitors to do the wrong number of windup laps and either accelerate too late or too early.
#2004
Lapped 3x
What timing systems are people using out there at their tracks? We bring out the physical loops that we tape down but we do not leave it out and apparently didn't have the foresight to make it permanent.
Is there an IR/beacon system out there? Something that grabs a transponder as it goes by? I used something like this in my race car a few years ago but it was a little bulky.
Is there an IR/beacon system out there? Something that grabs a transponder as it goes by? I used something like this in my race car a few years ago but it was a little bulky.
#2005
Senior Member
Doing my first race on a 333 track this weekend (have previously only raced on a 400). One of the events is a flying 200. As I'm used to it, I would basically dive out of the top of turn 2 towards the 200 meter line, which was between turn 2 and 3, and then ride the line from there on out.
Any basic advice for a flying 200 on a 333 track?
Thanks!
Any basic advice for a flying 200 on a 333 track?
Thanks!
Which 400 were you riding?
#2007
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Three small questions:
1. Where do you buy your chain rings from?
2. Is buying used chainrings - bad idea?
3. Why are chainrings so expensive?!?
1. Where do you buy your chain rings from?
2. Is buying used chainrings - bad idea?
3. Why are chainrings so expensive?!?
#2008
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
3. Generally chainrings are made out of stronger more expensive aluminum like 7075 to reduce wear and extend life. There is considerable amount of machine time to cut out all the tooth profiles, and then you have heat treating. I imagine there is a considerable amount of waste factored into the cost after all the excess metal is removed.
#2009
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 429
Bikes: S-1 :-D
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2. Not if its straight and the teeth aren't worn. The life of a chainring is much longer than the life of a cog.
3. Generally chainrings are made out of stronger more expensive aluminum like 7075 to reduce wear and extend life. There is considerable amount of machine time to cut out all the tooth profiles, and then you have heat treating. I imagine there is a considerable amount of waste factored into the cost after all the excess metal is removed.
3. Generally chainrings are made out of stronger more expensive aluminum like 7075 to reduce wear and extend life. There is considerable amount of machine time to cut out all the tooth profiles, and then you have heat treating. I imagine there is a considerable amount of waste factored into the cost after all the excess metal is removed.
Id add to that make sure its round. Although that might seem like a ridiculous statement, the lower end chainrings can be ever so slightly ovalled. very difficult to spot just looking at them, but get them on the bike and you'll have hard time getting your chain tension right. At one point it will be loose, and another tight. PITA!
#2010
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2. Not if its straight and the teeth aren't worn. The life of a chainring is much longer than the life of a cog.
3. Generally chainrings are made out of stronger more expensive aluminum like 7075 to reduce wear and extend life. There is considerable amount of machine time to cut out all the tooth profiles, and then you have heat treating. I imagine there is a considerable amount of waste factored into the cost after all the excess metal is removed.
3. Generally chainrings are made out of stronger more expensive aluminum like 7075 to reduce wear and extend life. There is considerable amount of machine time to cut out all the tooth profiles, and then you have heat treating. I imagine there is a considerable amount of waste factored into the cost after all the excess metal is removed.
#2012
Senior Member
Track Chainrings from Velodrome Shop
I would pick Campy rings because they are not that much more expensive than FSA from this supplier.
#2013
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Qc,Canada
Posts: 159
Bikes: Felt TK FRD
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Evans cycle and Wiggle both have some track chainring selection. Evans currently have all dura-ace size in stock and Wiggle has the best variety available with TA track chainrings.
#2014
Lapped 3x
I would be weary of ordering from velodromeshop.net. Have heard many horror stories about parts ordered not arriving, small items from same order being shipped separately and being charged twice for the shipping, as well as non-notification of backordered items. A friend had ordered a Casco Warp helmet and they didn't have it in stock. Was charged for the order, waited a month, called them and was told that they didn't have it in stock and were waiting for it to ship from the warehouse. I haven't personally ordered from there, but have friends that have had problematic dealings. No-one got ripped off, just really bad customer experience from all the things I have heard.
#2015
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here
Track Chainrings from Velodrome Shop
I would pick Campy rings because they are not that much more expensive than FSA from this supplier.
Track Chainrings from Velodrome Shop
I would pick Campy rings because they are not that much more expensive than FSA from this supplier.
I guess if I want FSAs I should be importing them from Retrogression
How do the DAs compare to FSAs? I'd get the DA for ~$90 and the FSA for ~$75
Last edited by rndstr; 03-01-15 at 04:11 PM.
#2016
Senior Member
I cited the velodrome shop because they stock FSA rings (according to their ad) but I have never used them. Probikekit has TA track rings for $59 and also a Campy pista crankset for $211. Probiekit and Wiggle have a been reliable for my buys.
#2017
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Qc,Canada
Posts: 159
Bikes: Felt TK FRD
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2018
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
One of those "velodrome shop" websites is known for having really long delays. Research before you buy from them.
Retrogression is owned by BikeForums member/admin Scrodzilla. I've purchased several items from him at great prices.
Edit:
https://www.bikeforums.net/track-cycl...eshop-net.html
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.velodromeshop.net
Retrogression is owned by BikeForums member/admin Scrodzilla. I've purchased several items from him at great prices.
Edit:
https://www.bikeforums.net/track-cycl...eshop-net.html
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.velodromeshop.net
Last edited by carleton; 03-01-15 at 08:48 PM.
#2019
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
The FSA are a big aluminum disc. The Dura Ace are obviously CNC'd out to shave weight. Performance wise, the FSA would be stronger. I've heard that the Dura Ace will warp under the strongest of riders. But, 99.9% of us won't have that problem.
The quality control of the two are top notch. I've owned a complete set of FSA and later a complete set of Sugino Zen and the FSA were just as round as the Zen.
#2020
Senior Member
Dura Ace are considerably lighter than the FSA.
The FSA are a big aluminum disc. The Dura Ace are obviously CNC'd out to shave weight. Performance wise, the FSA would be stronger. I've heard that the Dura Ace will warp under the strongest of riders. But, 99.9% of us won't have that problem.
The quality control of the two are top notch. I've owned a complete set of FSA and later a complete set of Sugino Zen and the FSA were just as round as the Zen.
The FSA are a big aluminum disc. The Dura Ace are obviously CNC'd out to shave weight. Performance wise, the FSA would be stronger. I've heard that the Dura Ace will warp under the strongest of riders. But, 99.9% of us won't have that problem.
The quality control of the two are top notch. I've owned a complete set of FSA and later a complete set of Sugino Zen and the FSA were just as round as the Zen.
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 03-02-15 at 01:24 AM.
#2021
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,926
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4817 Post(s)
Liked 3,945 Times
in
2,566 Posts
I have a full set of both FSA and DA rings. Some observations:
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
(You guys would laugh at my skinny thighs and zero snap, probably asking why this guy even cares. But I have serious issues with chain slack descending hills on a 42-17 when I cannot remotely keep either the top or bottom of the chain consistently tight. And throwing chains at 40+ just isn't fun. Also on real hill rides, I flip the wheel or change cogs, sometimes often. Having a real window of slack makes for easier and faster hub adjust with round rings; never going tight but staying within a 1/2" slack.)
Ben
#2022
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I have a full set of both FSA and DA rings. Some observations:
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
Baranoski's dad was the one telling me about DA rings warping under his son (the 0.1%).
You are definitley right about the FSA rings requiring a break-in. After about a year or two on my set of FSA rings, if I ever used one of the lesser used rings, I could feel the difference in smoothness.
I'd say that the FSA rings are to track chainrings are what the 105 Group is to road groups. Affordable, reliable, does what you expect, no complaints. If you have the extra money, then feel free to move up. But, FSA rings won't hold you back.
To OP:
Here is how the Zen rings are lighter than FSA:
The back-side of the FSA is solid:
Sugino Zen
I'm sure that more things go into making the Zen what it is, but that's one way that they (literally) shave weight.
#2023
aka mattio
#2024
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a full set of both FSA and DA rings. Some observations:
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
DA ring teeth are hobbed. FSA's teeth are machined. This gives the DA teeth a more accurate profile for better chain meshing (there is a lot of backlash with FSA rings; very little with DA) and makes the rings rounder. They are also nickel plated which seems to make them last longer. Because less attention is paid to the tooth profile with FSA rings, they take a bit of time to break in. There is no such break-in period necessary with DA rings.
DA rings are made from beefy aluminum stock. I've never heard of anyone warping one.
The machined out bits are really helpful for weight. DA rings are easily half the weight (for, say, a 50 tooth) of the FSA.
The FSA rings work well. The DA rings are really nice. I'd go DA (or Campy or Sugino) if you can afford them. The FSAs are yeoman rings. I don't know why anyone would go to any great lengths to find them. I got them because in the States, they are the cheapest option amongst legit track racing chainrings and freely available from many sources. They worked really well for me for a number of years, but they aren't anything special.
Thanks for the input, will probably go for Zens in the end since I won't get anything good for $55 around here.
#2025
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 956
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Bianchi Vigorelli
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would be weary of ordering from velodromeshop.net. Have heard many horror stories about parts ordered not arriving, small items from same order being shipped separately and being charged twice for the shipping, as well as non-notification of backordered items. A friend had ordered a Casco Warp helmet and they didn't have it in stock. Was charged for the order, waited a month, called them and was told that they didn't have it in stock and were waiting for it to ship from the warehouse. I haven't personally ordered from there, but have friends that have had problematic dealings. No-one got ripped off, just really bad customer experience from all the things I have heard.