Over-geared starts
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Over-geared starts
What is the consensus on the value of training starts in an over-gear? I had considered it a training staple, but a local coach has challenged that view and suggested that under-geared is more productive. What do you all think?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Alpenrose - Portland
Posts: 361
Bikes: Veloforma for my primary.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
both. I don't do starts very often, but I do use both overgear and under gear training as a regular staple. Over gear builds strength and increases stress, under gear improves form and fitness. I do more under gear in the off season, then work into over gear, then go back to undergear again, but I think mixing it up is always the best.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
That's kinda what I'm thinking to do. Thoughts on mixing over- and under-gear in the same session?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Alpenrose - Portland
Posts: 361
Bikes: Veloforma for my primary.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't typically mix them the same session, but I could mix them if I were doing two a days. I don't see an issue with it at all, but for me at least I prefer to stress one area at a time in training. That thing might be a complicated effort, but I like a session to have a single focus.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 740
Bikes: T1, S2, P3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would view overgear as similar to lifting weights. Its harder/heavier to build strength. Under for speed/form.
That said I also have a coach that is more into under gearing than over (for just about all drills), which mixed with a lifting program maybe is the better route? I dont know, if it hurts its probably working...
That said I also have a coach that is more into under gearing than over (for just about all drills), which mixed with a lifting program maybe is the better route? I dont know, if it hurts its probably working...
#6
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,116
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1338 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,446 Posts
I am not a fan of over gear for starts. Standing starts are similar to a golf swing in that due to the technical nature of the movements, proper technique can generate more force and forward velocity than brute strength. In a start, the proper timing, direction (up, down or straight), position over the bars, arm position and etc are all important. Muscling a bigger gear and potentially breaking form or learning a bad habit does not make a lot of sense to me.
I use smaller gears for form starts and race gears for full power.
I use smaller gears for form starts and race gears for full power.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Sound advice, thanks guys.
#8
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Over-gear is great
- It slows down the movement.
- It allows more time for each muscle in the chain to get trained.
- When you go down to race gears, they feel easier (obviously) and more manageable. You'll feel more confident getting it rolling.
Under-gear, not so much.
I don't thing under-gear starts are productive at all for training. I only use under-geared starts for warmups before using race gears or over-gears.
I use rolling jumps for under-gear start types of efforts.
- It slows down the movement.
- It allows more time for each muscle in the chain to get trained.
- When you go down to race gears, they feel easier (obviously) and more manageable. You'll feel more confident getting it rolling.
Under-gear, not so much.
I don't thing under-gear starts are productive at all for training. I only use under-geared starts for warmups before using race gears or over-gears.
I use rolling jumps for under-gear start types of efforts.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Over-gear is great
- It slows down the movement.
- It allows more time for each muscle in the chain to get trained.
- When you go down to race gears, they feel easier (obviously) and more manageable. You'll feel more confident getting it rolling.
Under-gear, not so much.
I don't thing under-gear starts are productive at all for training. I only use under-geared starts for warmups before using race gears or over-gears.
I use rolling jumps for under-gear start types of efforts.
- It slows down the movement.
- It allows more time for each muscle in the chain to get trained.
- When you go down to race gears, they feel easier (obviously) and more manageable. You'll feel more confident getting it rolling.
Under-gear, not so much.
I don't thing under-gear starts are productive at all for training. I only use under-geared starts for warmups before using race gears or over-gears.
I use rolling jumps for under-gear start types of efforts.
I'm just gonna mix it up.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 485
Bikes: A little of each
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
This has always been my thinking, too. The first phase of a standing start is over before you know it with undergear work, so what are you even working on? Then again, I'm usually wrong with my training, anyhow.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Medina, OH
Posts: 5,804
Bikes: confidential infromation that I don't even share with my wife
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why not all three ways, under, race and over gear? I was a track athlete when in college and coached HS for 6 years while my sons went through. In college early in the season we would practice block starts by having someone facing us and restraining our shoulders while back peddling in order to build strength. Late in the season we would do starts on a slight down hill to develop balance and leg speed. Of course we practiced starts on the level with starter's ****** for timing. When I coached HS technology caught up and we used rubber tubing and pulling devices that replicated what I did years before.
I can compare track starts to running starts in many ways. I don't think one size fits all but rather the athlete should determine the training goal then target the muscles and/or technique by stressing over gear, under gear or race gear. I practice starts on the street outside my driveway usually once a week. I built a jig to hold the bike and use my iPhone with a countdown app to practice metered breathing and start anticipation.
I can compare track starts to running starts in many ways. I don't think one size fits all but rather the athlete should determine the training goal then target the muscles and/or technique by stressing over gear, under gear or race gear. I practice starts on the street outside my driveway usually once a week. I built a jig to hold the bike and use my iPhone with a countdown app to practice metered breathing and start anticipation.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Alpenrose - Portland
Posts: 361
Bikes: Veloforma for my primary.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why not all three ways, under, race and over gear? I was a track athlete when in college and coached HS for 6 years while my sons went through. In college early in the season we would practice block starts by having someone facing us and restraining our shoulders while back peddling in order to build strength. Late in the season we would do starts on a slight down hill to develop balance and leg speed. Of course we practiced starts on the level with starter's ****** for timing. When I coached HS technology caught up and we used rubber tubing and pulling devices that replicated what I did years before.
Same exact principles apply, with the minor exception that I think I can handle more stress now. In part because running is harder on you and in part because I am older and have a larger overall base.
#13
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I have actually gone back to my high school track team training roots. I am amazed at how many decent running track training programs there are and how the basics from that time period and discipline totally apply to cycling training on the track. I spend my entire 90s working on volume as the core of my program when all I had to do was go back and pull up my high school track program and switch out running for cycling and make some minor changes to times and distances.
Same exact principles apply, with the minor exception that I think I can handle more stress now. In part because running is harder on you and in part because I am older and have a larger overall base.
Same exact principles apply, with the minor exception that I think I can handle more stress now. In part because running is harder on you and in part because I am older and have a larger overall base.
Also:
This is why I think that USA Cycling Track should look to USATF and AAU for a great talent pool of athletes who have been honing their engines since childhood.
Last edited by carleton; 07-26-14 at 05:26 PM.
#14
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
In this same vein...
High School track and field is a good way for a new track athlete to have a clue as to their muscle fiber type (fast twitch, slow twitch, or equal amounts of both). In high school sports, the kids are generally evenly matched in terms of weight, training, nutrition, and equipment. The determining factors are muscle fiber type and genetic predisposition ("raw talent").
Anyone who displayed a predisposition to short, middle, or long distance events in HS will likely excel in the corresponding event as an adult (or maybe even masters) track cycling athlete. If you were head-and-shoulders above your peers in HS (maybe state or national level) then that may hint at a genetic predisposition that you should consider now...if you still got it
High School track and field is a good way for a new track athlete to have a clue as to their muscle fiber type (fast twitch, slow twitch, or equal amounts of both). In high school sports, the kids are generally evenly matched in terms of weight, training, nutrition, and equipment. The determining factors are muscle fiber type and genetic predisposition ("raw talent").
Anyone who displayed a predisposition to short, middle, or long distance events in HS will likely excel in the corresponding event as an adult (or maybe even masters) track cycling athlete. If you were head-and-shoulders above your peers in HS (maybe state or national level) then that may hint at a genetic predisposition that you should consider now...if you still got it