Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
Reload this Page >

Equipment Weight (what matters and what doesn't?)

Search
Notices
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Equipment Weight (what matters and what doesn't?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-15, 08:36 AM
  #26  
Full Member
 
dunderhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: 130 miles from Ttown
Posts: 436

Bikes: Little Wing, XTRACK, Electron Pro, SuperCorsa, Paramount, & Thunderdrome

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TurtleRacer
Just curious - have you inspected your bearings to see how/why they failed? Or were they worn? deformed? One big advantage ceramics have over steel is corrosion resistance (and low friction in the absence of lube). Do you ride a lot in wet conditions? I don't doubt your experience - and I'm a big believer that anything that keeps your bike on the road and out of the shop is a worthwhile investment.

BTW The 'high loads' my mech eng friend was referring to was in the thousands of lbs of force, multi-thousand rpms, or hundreds of degree temperatures - so not your typical (or atypcal) biking conditions.
The loose bearings that I have inspected usually cracked, broked in half, or develop flat spots. I have also had races pit and split. Lately, most bearings that I have used are sealed and they just feel like that are a bunch of rocks tumbling around in the race. Like broken chains, bad bearings area part of my life and I just toss them without a second thought anymore. I do ride in the rain from time-to-time, but it's not that often.

I'll submit that a 300+lb guy climbing a 12 percent grade out of his seat is putting down 300+lbs of force with each pedal stroke on most likey 4-6 bearings at a time. Those 4-6 bearings would have a contact patch of maybe 0.01 square inches, so I'm looking at 30-40kpsi with my crude approximation. High grade steel bearings should be able to withstand almost an order of magnitude higher pressure, but my bearings don't fail immediately, so I know I'm not generating failure types of pressures immediately. It usually takes maybe a year to fail, so I suspect spherical imperfections, metallurgical imperfections, lubricant breakdown, or contamination can reduce the bearing contact point by an order of magnitude, thus reaching failure loading at those small points and starting the failure mechanism which leads to eventual failure over time. As a guy who has snapped a crank arm in half (ended up in a ditch), little things like bearings don't really stand a chance with me. Hopefully, the new lighter me won't have to replace so many parts in the future.

https://www.schaeffler.com/remotemedi...ures_us_en.pdf

Last edited by dunderhi; 01-27-15 at 08:37 AM. Reason: Attachment
dunderhi is offline  
Old 01-28-15, 04:35 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 19 Posts
I don't see why ceramic bearings wouldn't be a sensible option given they were installed and sealed properly - people still get hung up on problems from new bike technology from the first or second generation of a product, and the "myth" of the issue persists long after the issues have been resolved (BB30 creaks, carbon rims melt tires, carbon frames explode). If they are installed properly, and last well, I don't really see anything unreasonable there.
Buying speed by installing ceramic bearings for the majority of riders, though, is very, very expensive and marginal at best.
Minion1 is offline  
Old 01-28-15, 08:56 AM
  #28  
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,586

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Oldan Slo
A heavier bike is a detriment at all times in a TT. If you're analysis was true, then the hour record attempts would be ridden on very heavy bikes since the acceleration phase is short compared to the cruise phase.
Like Ondrej Sosenka's heavy-as-f wheels that he used to set his (redacted) Hour Record?
queerpunk is offline  
Old 01-28-15, 09:52 AM
  #29  
Elitist
Thread Starter
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Minion1
I don't see why ceramic bearings wouldn't be a sensible option given they were installed and sealed properly - people still get hung up on problems from new bike technology from the first or second generation of a product, and the "myth" of the issue persists long after the issues have been resolved (BB30 creaks, carbon rims melt tires, carbon frames explode). If they are installed properly, and last well, I don't really see anything unreasonable there.
Buying speed by installing ceramic bearings for the majority of riders, though, is very, very expensive and marginal at best.
What makes them not sensible is the high price for the marginal (at best) gains.

No one is saying that ceramic bearings are worse than quality steel bearings.

In my humble opinion, ceramic bearings have, by far, the lowest benefit/cost ratio of any changes we can make (equipment, bike fitting, coaching, diet, etc...) of all of the things that we can do to be faster or more efficient.

I've never heard anyone say or write, "I installed ceramic bearings and experienced an improvement." People say that about wheels, skinsuits, diet, aero bars, aero helmets, training, coaching, bike fitting, wind tunnel testing, etc... all the time.

I think that the money we'd spend on ceramic bearings could be spent on something that has a better chance of providing measurable results.

If dunderhi says that steel bearings fail for him and ceramics are reliable, then that's about durability, not speed or efficiency. That solves a real problem for him.
carleton is offline  
Old 01-29-15, 03:20 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by carleton
What makes them not sensible is the high price for the marginal (at best) gains.

No one is saying that ceramic bearings are worse than quality steel bearings.

In my humble opinion, ceramic bearings have, by far, the lowest benefit/cost ratio of any changes we can make (equipment, bike fitting, coaching, diet, etc...) of all of the things that we can do to be faster or more efficient.

I've never heard anyone say or write, "I installed ceramic bearings and experienced an improvement." People say that about wheels, skinsuits, diet, aero bars, aero helmets, training, coaching, bike fitting, wind tunnel testing, etc... all the time.

I think that the money we'd spend on ceramic bearings could be spent on something that has a better chance of providing measurable results.

If dunderhi says that steel bearings fail for him and ceramics are reliable, then that's about durability, not speed or efficiency. That solves a real problem for him.
Yeah, we're on the same song sheet. If they're more durable for Dunderhi, and his experience with them seems to say they are, and he's happy to pay for them, I reckon they're a good idea. I'm not, er, svelte, but I don't think I'm as big, or climbing as much, as Dunderhi, so I don't have any experience with them in that regard.

What I was really getting at, and this is a totally tangential mini-rant, is at the myths that persist about some newer bike tech, when the issues have been resolved with an update, a bit of common sense, decent installation and sensible use. Because I work in a bike shop, I hear this sort of stuff every day when some of the issues have been resolved years ago - people still think bike saddles lead to erectile dysfunction, for instance.

Another is that ceramic bearings turn to dust really quickly and are too fragile for use on a bike - with the first generation ceramic bearings, and lower quality/poorly designed bbs, this is probably true, and some people certainly got stung by these products. But they have improved considerably, and the newer ones seem to me much better. That they last well in Dunderhi's case kind of makes my point, so long as I'm not just relying on confirmation bias. It's basically a semantic argument, so apologies for that.


But yeah, they are the worst bang for buck in terms of actual performance by quite a long way.

Last edited by Minion1; 01-29-15 at 03:22 AM. Reason: Paragraphs
Minion1 is offline  
Old 01-29-15, 10:14 PM
  #31  
Full Member
 
dunderhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: 130 miles from Ttown
Posts: 436

Bikes: Little Wing, XTRACK, Electron Pro, SuperCorsa, Paramount, & Thunderdrome

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
This might be somewhat timely, but I noticed a pedal was starting to creak this evening. So I checked it out and it wasn't spinning smoothly. So rather than just chuck it and grab a spare, I decided to take a look at why it failed to satisfy the curiousity of some of the members here. First, a little background. This was a Shimano Dura-Ace 7800 SPD-SL pedal, the same model as I used on the track last year. This particular pedal was on my indoor trainer bike in the basement and has been getting a lot of riding time this winter. I would estimate that this pedal has less than 10kmi of use. Anyway, I took the pedal apart and there was ample grease that looked to be of a decent consistency. While I was cleaning out the pedal I was seeing little metal particles on my rag. I cleaned and then checked out the bearings. Both the roller and ball bearings looked good. See below.



So, this leaves the spindle or the bearing race. Well it was obvious with the grease cleaned off that the bearing race failed.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Bearing_Race.jpg (91.6 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg
Bearings.jpg (96.9 KB, 18 views)

Last edited by dunderhi; 01-30-15 at 07:34 AM. Reason: Wrong number
dunderhi is offline  
Old 01-30-15, 01:12 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Velocirapture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 429

Bikes: S-1 :-D

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dunderhi;17513163

So, this leaves the spindle or the bearing race. Well it was obvious with the grease cleaned off that the bearing race failed.

[ATTACH=CONFIG
431385[/ATTACH]
Thats not very regular-looking bearing race damage. I'm surprised that the bearings themselves were good, considering what they were running over
Velocirapture is offline  
Old 01-30-15, 07:33 AM
  #33  
Full Member
 
dunderhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: 130 miles from Ttown
Posts: 436

Bikes: Little Wing, XTRACK, Electron Pro, SuperCorsa, Paramount, & Thunderdrome

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Velocirapture
Thats not very regular-looking bearing race damage. I'm surprised that the bearings themselves were good, considering what they were running over
Well, when I say good, I mean they look round and not broken in half to my 50 year old eyes. Larger bearings, like in BBs, are more easily inspected. These bearings did their best to roll away from me once I got the grease off. From the looks of it, I would say the spindle and bearings were steel, but the race was aluminum which is the the weaker material. I'm tempted to take apart one of my carbon-bodied D/A pedals to look at the race material. Hopefully it's steel.
dunderhi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
donheff
Fifty Plus (50+)
43
10-04-17 12:36 PM
sam12
Road Cycling
102
10-04-11 09:09 PM
BLR_0719
Road Cycling
38
08-17-10 10:36 PM
chinarider
Road Cycling
9
03-14-10 08:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.