Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    chattanooga ,TN
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    heart rate monitor

    im still new to all this ,but is it a must to have a heart rate mon. and if so how do you use it and how do you find what your max should be.

  2. #2
    more ape than man timmhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    8,093
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    not a must at all. it simply measures how fast your heart rate is - you can certainly ride a bike and train without one. there are benefits to using one, because you can train in certain zones without any guess work. you'll also know if you are over extending yourself. might be good if you have a heart condition.

    there is a medical exam you can take to determine your max HR, but for most of us we use the 220-age = max HR. i'm 27 years old so my HR is 220-27 = 193. it's not perfect but it's in the ball park.

  3. #3
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,259
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you want to use a structured training programs, they are very helpful. If you just want to ride and have fun, there's not much point. On a long ride they are good at keeping you from exercising too hard.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    late really sum it up. Nevertheless, since you're reading this column, and not touring or pleasure ride, I'd reccommend that you get one. To me, the two most important data I need are HR and cadence. I don't compete anymore, but I still wear the chest transmitter on most rides, even on touring trip. After the HR and the cadence, then it's speed and trip meter.

    "there is a medical exam you can take to determine your max HR, but for most of us we use the 220-age = max HR. i'm 27 years old so my HR is 220-27 = 193. it's not perfect but it's in the ball park."
    BTW It's not in the ball park, but a safe starting point for somone who hasn't taken max HR test under medical supervision. I'm not in shape competition wise, yet my max HR is over 10 beats above the 220-age. Imagine the max HR of Lance. Testing for max HR without medical supervision can be fatal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •