Baked Potato
Ok I got a question about baked potatoes. I was looking for caloric info for a potato I bought at the store. It's one of those already washed and ready to "bake". Well I was looking and saw that there is a huge discrepency in calories between a "raw" potato and a "baked" potato. I mean, can baking something (I just put it in the microwave) really add calories somehow? I used both www.calorieking.com and www.calorie-count.com and both have the calories for a baked potato of the same size being much higher than a raw potato. What's the deal?
|
Maybe they're factoring in common toppings for a typical baked potato: butter, sour cream, etc.?
|
This may be some completely fuzzy science on my part...
I may be completely off... When you heat something up, you have to add calories to it to do so. Because a baked potato has been heated up, it has had calories added to it. I think it takes 1 calorie to raise 1ml of water 1*C, so that may be where the answer lies. But don't take my word for it... Penguins are designed for surviving in the cold, not figuring out calorie counts |
Not add calories to heat something, but expend. Ergo, the microwave is expending calories to heat whatever is in it. Well, not calories but energy.
|
Its been a few years since chemistry class :)
|
Just took a look at the sites you're talking about- it has to do with the default serving sizes of the potatos being different. Make sure when you're comparing an unbaked potato with a baked potato the same serving sizes are selected, and you'll see that there is no calorie difference.
|
Originally Posted by cheebahmunkey
Ok I got a question about baked potatoes. I was looking for caloric info for a potato I bought at the store. It's one of those already washed and ready to "bake". Well I was looking and saw that there is a huge discrepency in calories between a "raw" potato and a "baked" potato. I mean, can baking something (I just put it in the microwave) really add calories somehow? I used both www.calorieking.com and www.calorie-count.com and both have the calories for a baked potato of the same size being much higher than a raw potato. What's the deal?
|
Originally Posted by alison_in_oh
The potato loses water weight when it's cooked. So the caloric value per gram of weight goes up. (Per the USDA database, 93 cal/100 g baked or 77 cal/100 g raw). But the caloric value per unit potato stays about the same (278 cal cooked vs. 284 cal raw for a 3" large potato).
|
Use the weight of the uncooked potatoe then use the calories for an uncooked potatoe. Or use the weight of the cooked potatoe and then the calories of a cooked potatoe. If anything cooking can reduce calories by breaking bonds in the food (like burning it). The calories you get are from breaking the chemical bonds of the food.
|
Originally Posted by cheebahmunkey
ok so if my potato said it weighed 8 ounces on the package then how many calories did it have when I ate it? Should I use the caloric information for uncooked because I have its uncooked weight?
|
Originally Posted by BeTheChange
Use the weight of the uncooked potatoe then use the calories for an uncooked potatoe. Or use the weight of the cooked potatoe and then the calories of a cooked potatoe. If anything cooking can reduce calories by breaking bonds in the food (like burning it). The calories you get are from breaking the chemical bonds of the food.
|
African or European baked potato?
|
Originally Posted by gcasillo
African or European baked potato?
|
[QUOTE=cheebahmunkey]Russett <---- dunno where that's from[/"QUOTE]
"AAAAGGGHHHH!" screams cheebahmunkey, as he goes flying into the abyss. |
[QUOTE=jnbacon]
Originally Posted by cheebahmunkey
Russett <---- dunno where that's from[/"QUOTE]
"AAAAGGGHHHH!" screams cheebahmunkey, as he goes flying into the abyss. |
Originally Posted by gcasillo
African or European baked potato?
|
Originally Posted by cheebahmunkey
**********
http://arago4.tn.utwente.nl/stonedea...il/ra/23-06.ra [requires RealPlayer] |
Originally Posted by jnbacon
This discussion has devolved into Monty Python riffing.
http://arago4.tn.utwente.nl/stonedea...il/ra/23-06.ra [requires RealPlayer] |
Ditch the white potato
Eat the yam, sweet potato far healthier |
Originally Posted by Travelinguyrt
Ditch the white potato
Eat the yam, sweet potato far healthier |
Originally Posted by cheebahmunkey
how's that? And no I'm not gonna ditch the white potato. The two have completely different tastes.
|
Originally Posted by alison_in_oh
He too is referring to glycemic index: you sort of get more bang for your buck with potatoes other than big ol' bakers, and sweet potatoes are actually one of the lowest GI, IIRC. Plus you get beta carotene. But it's your gullet. ;)
|
And let's not forget the difference between yams (african origin) and sweet potatos (south american origin). I don't think there is an indigenous european potato. http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/hil/hil-23-a.html
|
And the relative Glycemic Indexes of potatoes, sweet potatoes and yams (and lots of other foods - click here).
Vegetables · Parsnips 97 · Potato – baked 85 · Potato – instant 83 · Pumpkin 75 · French fries 75 · Potato – fresh – mashed 73 · Rutabaga 72 · Carrot 71 · Beets 64 · New Potato 62 · Sweet corn 55 · Sweet potato 54 · Yam 51 · Tomato 38 · Green vegetables low · Bean sprouts low · Cauliflower low · Eggplant low · Peppers low · Squash low · Onions low · Water chestnuts low Incidentally, you see a wide range of GI values in different tables for baked potatoes, from in the 80's to over 100. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.