Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-08-02, 10:07 PM   #1
filark
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
filark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes:
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
best way to track progress?

Hey all,
I'm relatively new to cycling, so the question I have is how to best track progress and results. I'm wanting to be able to show the progress I've made since knee surgery. I rode ~25 this evening on an old mb I have had for about 7 yrs.
I want to be able to write notes about how my knee did.
Anyone have any clues?
Keith
filark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-02, 08:43 AM   #2
joeprim
Senior Member
 
joeprim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Neck Tidewater Va.
Bikes:
Posts: 1,688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Good for you.

As for keeping track have a diary. Any form you like from a little pink book to a computer program. I would think the best would be a notebook where you could log you trips: distance, time, what you ate and drank. Make sure you leave room for how you felt and other personal stuff.
Joe
joeprim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-02, 02:45 AM   #3
jmlee
serial mender
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bonn, Germany
Bikes:
Posts: 416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Excel spreadsheets are ideal for this. You can record everything you want (even the number of birds you saw). Take a column or two and stretch them really wide for things like how you felt, etc.

But, I would agree with the above. Record it anywhere that you are comfortable with. Just make sure that you make it so that the information is accessible when you want to look at it.

Also, don't get obsessed with average speed as an indication of progress. It is only good as a very broad measure (over months). Short-term, there are too many other factors (windy, hills, traffic) to make it worthwhile. Distance, what you did (hills, flats, etc.), quality of ride, how you felt, are much better indicators.

Cheers,
Jamie
jmlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-02, 07:10 AM   #4
BikingCT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Connecticut, USA
Bikes: 2002 Cannondale R3000 Si Triple; 2003 Cannondale R900 Si
Posts: 78
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Jamie's advice about average speed is right on. Unless your training for the big race, average speed is only a good marker over time. I ride with a friend who insists on equaling or bettering his average speed each time he rides, regardless of conditions. It makes for a miserable finish to a nice ride when he doesn't accomplish his goal.

I use an Excell Spreadsheet to track everything, but also back it up with Bike ProLog, which is a free service on the internet (bikeprolog.com). On the spreadsheet I track time, distance, average speed, my route, and any notes (e.g., weather conditions, strange noises coming from the bike, cool things I saw along the way, etc.). I also use the spreadsheet to track my weight and body fat (post-ride) to look for fitness trends. I love manipulating all the data and making graphs to track my progress in all these different areas.
BikingCT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-02, 04:20 AM   #5
jmlee
serial mender
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bonn, Germany
Bikes:
Posts: 416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To support my average speed assertion, i offer the following comparison:

A ride on essentially flat terrain will allow you to go a very consistent speed. Your average might even be close to the speed you see while actually riding.

But, a ride with a lot of hills will be made up of long slow ascents and descents that are equally long in distance, but much shorter in time. The time lost on the ascent is rarely regained on the equivalent descent. Hence such a ride will produce a lower average speed.

I'll leave it to you to judge which ride produced the harder workout.

But, of course, many of us frequently ride the same routes. Except for wind, the average can be a useful comparison here.

Cheers,
Jamie
jmlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.