Stevia - Safe?
#1
The Question Man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stevia - Safe?
I just heard about this sweetner from someone behind me in line at Whole Foods. She said she uses it (Stevia that is) all the time and it's much better than any artificial sweetner (because Stevia is natural) and also much better (duh) than white sugar. Has anyone used Stevia before? Are there any side effects? I can believe it is being suppressed by the Sugar companies but I guess it would be possible that it could be detrimental to one's health. Thanks in advance guys!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
White sugar is poison! It's the same color as arsenic, and they use that to kill rats! Plus, white sugar catches fire and burns, just like gasoline and wood, and you wouldn't eat gasoline would you????
Stevia, on the other hand, is made from a plant, so it must be good! Plus, the plant is an herb, just like hemp, so it's even better together!!
Stevia, on the other hand, is made from a plant, so it must be good! Plus, the plant is an herb, just like hemp, so it's even better together!!
#3
The Question Man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lws
White sugar is poison! It's the same color as arsenic, and they use that to kill rats! Plus, white sugar catches fire and burns, just like gasoline and wood, and you wouldn't eat gasoline would you????
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 384
Bikes: Trek 1000c
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I discovered Stevia about a year ago and have been using it ever since in coffee, tea, etc. I still use Splenda if I need something to cook with. The only side effect that I have found is a packet of Stevia has a gram of fiber in it. Also, it is very sweet, so I only use part of a pack for an entire pot of tea.
Sandy
Sandy
#5
The Question Man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SandySwimmer
I discovered Stevia about a year ago and have been using it ever since in coffee, tea, etc. I still use Splenda if I need something to cook with. The only side effect that I have found is a packet of Stevia has a gram of fiber in it. Also, it is very sweet, so I only use part of a pack for an entire pot of tea.
Sandy
Sandy
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 384
Bikes: Trek 1000c
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's just that it takes very little Stevia to sweeten. If you need the consistency of sugar for a recipe, you wowuld need to use something else. I did some research when I first heard of it. What I like is there are no chemicals in it. I can't remember the number, but I think it's 10 times sweeter than sugar. I like the packets because they are convenient.
Sandy
Sandy
#7
The Question Man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SandySwimmer
It's just that it takes very little Stevia to sweeten. If you need the consistency of sugar for a recipe, you wowuld need to use something else. I did some research when I first heard of it. What I like is there are no chemicals in it. I can't remember the number, but I think it's 10 times sweeter than sugar. I like the packets because they are convenient.
Sandy
Sandy
#8
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lws
Stevia, on the other hand, is made from a plant, so it must be good!
I must have been sick the day they told me what sugar was made out of......... apparently it is not from cane or beets, or aren't they plants?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 384
Bikes: Trek 1000c
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have found stevia at Whole Foods and Earth Fare. The brand I happen to buy (because the woman at Earth Fare first recommended it) is SweetLeaf. A little is very sweet, too much and it becomes a bit bitter. Now that I think of it, I may only use 1/2 packet in a pot of tea. I usually have two pots in a day though. A little goes a long way.
Sandy
Sandy
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stevia is a great product to use, I have been using it for over a year now, I can't completely replace sugar with stevia, but I have cut down alot in areas that sure needed it. I use it in kool-aid (I like the lemonaid koolaid) and I like it quite sweet so its probably about a teaspoon and a half I use. I have tried to bake with it without much luck, particularly chocolate chip cookies... no success you just use too much sugar and the consistancy is wrong. But it is good in cooking I find, things like sauces, if you make your own dressings or anything like that it works great.
As for where to find it, you should be able to get it from health food stores, its quite popular espicially as a diabetic substitute. I would not recommend ordering it online, I've not found anywhere online that makes the price worth it.
I did however order stevia seeds, I am growing an indoor herb garden for the winter and stevia is top on my list.
Also I will make note it doesn't taste exactly like sugar, it is sweet, espicialy on a one to one ratio but I personally don't find it as sweet as they say it is, but still very sweet in compairison. Also the stevia extract is less bitter.
As for where to find it, you should be able to get it from health food stores, its quite popular espicially as a diabetic substitute. I would not recommend ordering it online, I've not found anywhere online that makes the price worth it.
I did however order stevia seeds, I am growing an indoor herb garden for the winter and stevia is top on my list.
Also I will make note it doesn't taste exactly like sugar, it is sweet, espicialy on a one to one ratio but I personally don't find it as sweet as they say it is, but still very sweet in compairison. Also the stevia extract is less bitter.
#11
The Guadfather
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fart Worth
Posts: 1,090
Bikes: Trek, Centurion, Kuwahara coming soon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I highly recommend sucanat, which is the rawest of sugars (also referred to as green sugar). I use it whenever possible.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
"Minor bun engine, made Benny Lava!!!"
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
"Minor bun engine, made Benny Lava!!!"
#12
~
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SandySwimmer
I did some research when I first heard of it. What I like is there are no chemicals in it.
Sandy
Sandy
I read an interesting journal article (Efficacy and tolerability of oral stevioside in patients with mild essential hypertension) Where stevia is succesfully used to lower blood pressure in people with hyper tension.
It may be interesting to know that one the makers of aspartame convinced the FDA to label stevia as unsafe. Another study declared that large amounts of stevia can cause cancer and other problems. The funny thing is that the articles used for the negative points on stevia are about the only ones that are reffered too but the ones that show the positive uses are not reffered too. Hmmmmmmm.
#13
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by akarius
It may be interesting to know that one the makers of aspartame convinced the FDA to label stevia as unsafe. Another study declared that large amounts of stevia can cause cancer and other problems. The funny thing is that the articles used for the negative points on stevia are about the only ones that are reffered too but the ones that show the positive uses are not reffered too. Hmmmmmmm.
The funny thing is that just about any food can have a negative effect, in addition to positive ones for different people, in different quantities, etc. Just because something is "natural" or doesn't contain any chemicals (ha ha!) doesn't mean it's inherently good (or bad). Last I checked there were plenty of "natural" substances which are quite toxic, and plenty of synthesized or refined ones which are benign or even beneficial.
For some, stevia may be a good alternative to regular sugars, particularly if there is some sensitivity to sugar. But it may also be problematic, particularly if one has allergies to ragweed or other members of the Asteraceae family of which stevia is a member. And of course the studies mentioned above have to make you wonder, but then again there are probably tons of similar ones about sugar, aspartame, and other sweeteners.
#14
The Question Man
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
awesome stuff guys. Really, I come here when I have questions about nutrition, not my doc. Why? Because you guys know more I'm so glad I found this site
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by cheebahmunkey
I just heard about this sweetner from someone behind me in line at Whole Foods. She said she uses it (Stevia that is) all the time and it's much better than any artificial sweetner (because Stevia is natural) and also much better (duh) than white sugar. Has anyone used Stevia before? Are there any side effects? I can believe it is being suppressed by the Sugar companies but I guess it would be possible that it could be detrimental to one's health. Thanks in advance guys!
Koffee
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland or
Posts: 1,888
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 'nother
It may also be interesting to know that Stevia is currently banned in the EU, Singapore, and Hong Kong as a food additive, with (apparently) no urging from the makers of aspartame. Also, as it is currently in the U.S., it's only approved as a "dietary supplement", not a food additive, in Canada and Australia.
we don't see thigns that are natural and good for us reccomended because they can't be made profitable.
#17
~
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are studies on stevia that indicate that there is no harm done on a genetic level by taking large quantities of stevia, these studies were done on mice and rats. I have found that on the net when they say stevia in large doses can cause DNA mutations which lead to cancer, they do not name their sources.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Just about anything can cause cancer in mice and rats while in the lab. I remember when they said that Orbit gum caused cancer in mice- therefore, it causes cancer in humans. Orbit gum was yanked from the shelves, all for nothing. Now we know that just because it does something to lab rats, doesn't exactly mean it'll have the same effects on humans.
But I do not think stevia has any harmful effects on folks.
Koffee
But I do not think stevia has any harmful effects on folks.
Koffee
#19
~
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by koffee brown
Just about anything can cause cancer in mice and rats while in the lab. I remember when they said that Orbit gum caused cancer in mice- therefore, it causes cancer in humans. Orbit gum was yanked from the shelves, all for nothing. Now we know that just because it does something to lab rats, doesn't exactly mean it'll have the same effects on humans.
But I do not think stevia has any harmful effects on folks.
Koffee
But I do not think stevia has any harmful effects on folks.
Koffee
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland or
Posts: 1,888
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by akarius
Where does it say it causes cancer? A gene mutation is a gene mutation, since the genes in humans and rats are almost the same do you not think that there would be some relavence. The fact is doses as high as 2000 mg/kg caused no gene mutations, but sources on the net say stevia in high doses causes cancer but they offer no proof.
The only reason stevia is not in foods is because it will not make anyone a profit. So we suffer with bad for us products so someone can make a buck.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,937
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12171 Post(s)
Liked 1,479 Times
in
1,092 Posts
It tastes really bad in coffee. Goes well with fruit flavors.
I used to use it in my fruit shakes; but I decided to give up
artificial sweetners.
I used to use it in my fruit shakes; but I decided to give up
artificial sweetners.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland or
Posts: 1,888
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by late
It tastes really bad in coffee. Goes well with fruit flavors.
I used to use it in my fruit shakes; but I decided to give up
artificial sweetners.
I used to use it in my fruit shakes; but I decided to give up
artificial sweetners.
#23
~
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steveknight
But then we have all the artificial sweeteners that are perfectly safe. The problem is money that really pays to find out something that is almost free is bad for you? Who won’t pay for testing on something that makes a huge profit?
The only reason stevia is not in foods is because it will not make anyone a profit. So we suffer with bad for us products so someone can make a buck.
The only reason stevia is not in foods is because it will not make anyone a profit. So we suffer with bad for us products so someone can make a buck.
So the fact that stevia is used is by millions of people does not mean that the people who sell it are making big profits? There is a possibility for a huge market considering all the diabetics that could benifit from a sweetener that does not have the physiological effects of cane of beet sugar
It seems that one of the main reasons that stevia is not is foods is because the government will not allow it to be used as such.
There have been tests on stevia, and they seem to point to the same thing.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland or
Posts: 1,888
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
huge profits? I doubt it. since it is not a big seller like splenda. imagine if coca cola used it? thats a big deal. health food strores are nto a big deal.
the plant is easy to grow and it can be grown at home. these are reasons why big buisness does not want it. profit has made this world a hard place to live. al lthe processed foods all the medicines ignored because they can't be made profitable all the people that starve and die becaue of profit. stevia has been used for a hell of a long time without problems. but will you really see real studies about it? I doubt it who would pay for them? studies can only be valid they are not sponsored by someone that will profit from the results.
one reason I don't have any proof about the two big sweetners today who owuld pay for the real studies?
the plant is easy to grow and it can be grown at home. these are reasons why big buisness does not want it. profit has made this world a hard place to live. al lthe processed foods all the medicines ignored because they can't be made profitable all the people that starve and die becaue of profit. stevia has been used for a hell of a long time without problems. but will you really see real studies about it? I doubt it who would pay for them? studies can only be valid they are not sponsored by someone that will profit from the results.
one reason I don't have any proof about the two big sweetners today who owuld pay for the real studies?
#25
~
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steveknight
huge profits? I doubt it. since it is not a big seller like splenda. imagine if coca cola used it? thats a big deal. health food strores are nto a big deal.
the plant is easy to grow and it can be grown at home. these are reasons why big buisness does not want it. profit has made this world a hard place to live. al lthe processed foods all the medicines ignored because they can't be made profitable all the people that starve and die becaue of profit. stevia has been used for a hell of a long time without problems. but will you really see real studies about it? I doubt it who would pay for them? studies can only be valid they are not sponsored by someone that will profit from the results.
one reason I don't have any proof about the two big sweetners today who owuld pay for the real studies?
the plant is easy to grow and it can be grown at home. these are reasons why big buisness does not want it. profit has made this world a hard place to live. al lthe processed foods all the medicines ignored because they can't be made profitable all the people that starve and die becaue of profit. stevia has been used for a hell of a long time without problems. but will you really see real studies about it? I doubt it who would pay for them? studies can only be valid they are not sponsored by someone that will profit from the results.
one reason I don't have any proof about the two big sweetners today who owuld pay for the real studies?
The people who are looking to control diabetes will pay for studies on it and already have, people who are trying to understand and build a knowledge base on sweeteners other than sugar already have. As well on people trying to understand the effects of stevia on hypertension have.
There are lots of things that can be grown at home quite easily and people go to the grocery store and pay for them. The fact that someone can grow something at home does not stop big business from cashing in.
Health shops are not in it for the money? Is that what you mean by "health food strores are nto a big deal" (sic).
I guess a single company selling 1.57 billion dollars in product in one year is not a big deal.
I see many health food stores that are huge, and have locations all over the country, is a corporation with over 5000 stores not a big deal? I guess they are not in it for the money, or do you have to be a Mcdonalds or Coke to be in it for the money. It is many companies coming together making huge profits off of what can be sold for a fraction of the price in a grocery store.