Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member Fastfwd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Raised my max bpm from 190 to 192

    I finally was able to reach over 100% bpm during a sprint on the trainer. This means that all my zones will now be a little higher. Also it means the next time I have to shoot for more than 192 to see what is my real max bpm.

  2. #2
    ???What??? barleyrocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Portland ish
    My Bikes
    Cervelo R2.5 - Cervelo P2k - Bianchi Vigorelli - Cannondale 3.0
    Posts
    312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it means you have not found your max. It doesn't go up due to conditioning. Means when you tested to find it you were not really ready to test. Good luck,
    ???Huh???

  3. #3
    Oldbie bike racer
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NorCal
    My Bikes
    Steve Rex road, track, Richard Sachs road, Giant mtb
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by barleyrocket
    it means you have not found your max. It doesn't go up due to conditioning. Means when you tested to find it you were not really ready to test. Good luck,
    Righto!

    And who cares about MHR anyway? It's a relatively poor way of establishing training zones. Find your lactate threshold or functional threshold and base the zones off one of those.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Fastfwd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WarrenG
    And who cares about MHR anyway? It's a relatively poor way of establishing training zones. Find your lactate threshold or functional threshold and base the zones off one of those.
    Everything that I read about finding those zones seems like guessing. At least with MHR I get a precise number. I'm the kind of person that likes precise numbers, not guesses.

    I do understand that using % of MHR is guessing the other zones. But I have no better way to do it.

  5. #5
    base training heretic Squint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    Cervelo P3C, many Litespeeds
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Training with HR involves a lot of guessing. The more precise information you try to get out of it, the more this problem becomes apparent. I found that temperature, hydration, and blood glucose levels affected my HR quite a bit. Some days, I could ride at 195 for over an hour but on other days, I couldn't even ride at 185.

    So I gave up on HR many years ago.


    Quote Originally Posted by Fastfwd
    Everything that I read about finding those zones seems like guessing. At least with MHR I get a precise number. I'm the kind of person that likes precise numbers, not guesses.

    I do understand that using % of MHR is guessing the other zones. But I have no better way to do it.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Fastfwd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll probably switch from HR to lap time when summer comes. But for now it's the most accurate objective measurement of effort I have. Just to make sure I keep training harder.

    It's a shame that I did'nt know about the Garmin 305 before. It seems like a great idea to be able to race a virtual competitor. This looks like a great way to know if you are training harder than you ever did before this season.

    Lap times are great but how do you know when you have in the middle if you are getting a good lap or not? Maybe I'll get used to it and just know that I have to be at "this time" when I reach "that tree" or something like that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •