Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    mac
    mac is offline
    They see me rollin' mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    2005 Cannondale T2000
    Posts
    785
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Calories burned calculators: which bodyweight to use?

    The Calories Burned Calculators that you find on the Internet all require you to enter your bodyweight. However, it doesn't specify which kind of bodyweight: lean mass, total, specific bodyweight %?

    i.e. I'm pretty sure a 200lb bodybuilder with 5% bodyfat will burn more calories than a 200lb couch potato with 35% bodyfat.

    So what number should I plug into those calculators? Does it assume, say, 15% bodyfat? So should I first find out what my lean body mass is then divide by .85 to get the right number to plug into the calculator?

  2. #2
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends upon what kind of calories-burned you're calculating. If you're figuring out calories burned during a workout, then put in your true body weight. If you're calculating calories-burned for maintaining body-heat, you'd want to enter a slightly larger number to account for faster heat-loss (you've got less insulation). Overall, there's a great amount of inaccuracies in these calculators anyway because everyone's body, efficiency and fitness is different. I'd guesstimate that they're accurate to +/-20% at best.

  3. #3
    Twincities MN kuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Salsa, Cannondale, Surly.
    Posts
    2,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    People always overestimate their calories burned and underestimate the food they eat.

  4. #4
    OMG! i'm a DURT gurl!!!! caligurl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    HOT, sunny socal desert
    My Bikes
    2007 specialized stumpjumper FSR expert, 2006 specialized ruby pro, 2004 specialized dolce elite, 2005 specialized hardrock
    Posts
    4,939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hmmmmmm i've never thought of that... i just always put in my actual body weight... even though i have a lower body fat (i do lift weight so have some muskel!)

    of course... since i'm small... i know i don't burn the calories that guys burn... plus i've been working out and my body has gotten too efficient so that i don't burn a lot of calories....

    i do measure my food to make sure i don't overeat (ok... it doesn't always work!)

    but i agree... most people do underestimate their food (how many of you actually eat ONE serving of meat... that's 3 oz!!!!! lol!)
    OCP and PROUD!
    "OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
    life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........

  5. #5
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kuan
    People always overestimate their calories burned and underestimate the food they eat.
    Not always.

    Today, I did a metric century on my own while rev'ed up on an ECA stack. It felt harder than the last century I did last weekend, due to a headwind on the leg back home and the effects of the stack.

    According to my Timex HRM, I averaged 147 BPM for the entire ride, peaked at 172 BPM (my max on the bike is 186 BPM), and burned 3,710 Kcals.

    My BMR for my age and weight is about 1,556 Kcals and the only thing I had before the ride was a cup of grape nuts granola cereal in skim milk and a banana--approximately 550 Kcals. During the ride, I had 2 x 24 oz of Gatorade--160 Kcals per bottle. After resting, I had a can of chili, another banana, and a protein drink--830 Kcals.

    So, here's what my "energy" day looked like mathematically:

    Code:
    BMR        Activity (Kcal)    Total (Kcal)        
    1556    plus    3710    equals    5266        
            Factor    equals    3.4        
     
            Food (Kcal)    equals    1700        
            Debt (Kcal)    equals    3566    1.02    pounds
    So, according to the above, I'm about 1 pound down for the day, if I have nothing more.

    Realistically, I'll probably have something else, but it won't be over the 3,566 Kcal debt. I can confidently say that today, my energy expenditures will be greater than my energy intake even if the BMR and Activity calculations are little off.

    The reason I'm watching my weight isn't because of a race... no, I'm going on vacation in Cancun. I want to look good im my Speedo.


    .
    Last edited by NoRacer; 09-23-06 at 04:59 PM.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mac
    The Calories Burned Calculators that you find on the Internet all require you to enter your bodyweight. However, it doesn't specify which kind of bodyweight: lean mass, total, specific bodyweight %?

    i.e. I'm pretty sure a 200lb bodybuilder with 5% bodyfat will burn more calories than a 200lb couch potato with 35% bodyfat.

    So what number should I plug into those calculators? Does it assume, say, 15% bodyfat? So should I first find out what my lean body mass is then divide by .85 to get the right number to plug into the calculator?
    I don't think that the calculators are accurate enough for it to matter. Heart rate monitors will give you a better estimate.
    Eric

    2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
    199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

    Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
    Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com

  7. #7
    Twincities MN kuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Salsa, Cannondale, Surly.
    Posts
    2,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoRacer
    Not always.
    .
    blah
    blah
    .
    .
    more blah
    Yeah yeah... you're not estimating. You're actually counting.

    Me, I ate at least 3000 kcals at dinner tonight.

    Yours truly,

    Fatty McWhycan'tIlosemygut

  8. #8
    better than brand X!
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is there anywhere to put in your bodyweight and heartrate to calculate calories burned online, ie perform the work that my ****ty heart rate monitor pretends it can do?

  9. #9
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neither would be very accurate anyway. Your HR @ 160-170bpm for an hour would represent the kind of work your body can do in its current fitness shape. Compare the same HR to a beginning rider would show them to burn off fewer calories. Compare your numbers to Lance @ 160-170bpm would show he's burning off mroe calories. The only way to accurately determine calories-burnt is to actually measure it. Put a rider in an isothermic chamber and measure how much he heats up his surroundings...

  10. #10
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kuan
    Yeah yeah... you're not estimating.
    ...
    blah, blah, blah

    ...
    They're all estimates--the calculation for BMR, expended calories derived from an algorithm embedded in the Timex HRM, and the calories assigned to foods from nutritiondata.com. None is exact.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  11. #11
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
    Neither would be very accurate anyway. Your HR @ 160-170bpm for an hour would represent the kind of work your body can do in its current fitness shape. Compare the same HR to a beginning rider would show them to burn off fewer calories. Compare your numbers to Lance @ 160-170bpm would show he's burning off mroe calories. The only way to accurately determine calories-burnt is to actually measure it. Put a rider in an isothermic chamber and measure how much he heats up his surroundings...
    In the absence of an isothermic chamber, it's the best one can do to track energy input and output on some consistent and convenient basis.

    And, it's apparent from my before and after pics, that my method is doomed to failure :

    Last edited by NoRacer; 09-24-06 at 02:33 PM.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  12. #12
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeferret
    Is there anywhere to put in your bodyweight and heartrate to calculate calories burned online, ie perform the work that my ****ty heart rate monitor pretends it can do?
    The problem with such a tool is that it's not taking into consideration the work being done as it changes with intensity due to external (temp, terrain, wind, position on the bike, etc.) and internal factors (hydration status, fitness level, thermoregulation, etc.)

    An HRM can sample heart rate at intervals and apply the inferred work load to an algorithm that approximates kcals burned.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  13. #13
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,015
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoRacer
    The problem with such a tool is that it's not taking into consideration the work being done as it changes with intensity due to external (temp, terrain, wind, position on the bike, etc.) and internal factors (hydration status, fitness level, thermoregulation, etc.)

    An HRM can sample heart rate at intervals and apply the inferred work load to an algorithm that approximates kcals burned.
    http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm

    Takes into account wind, grade, speed, type of bike and the only thing it doesn't take into account is HR
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  14. #14
    Long Distance Cyclist Machka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    I ride where the thylacine roamed!
    My Bikes
    Lots
    Posts
    38,729
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you want to lose weight, enter the body weight you WANT to be. There's no point entering your current body weight ... that would only work if you want to MAINTAIN your body weight. Plus, because most people overestimate their calories burned and underestimate the food they eat, entering a lower weight would give you a more accurate reading.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •