Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by race newbie
You are somewhat correct. There are different values of expression for VO2 max. I've had mine tested. The tester takes your exercise intensity up until you max out on oxygen consumption and plateau to get your VO2 number, all the while your HR is climbing. Your HR will reach very close to it's max when you hit the plateau point. The tester gave me both my VO2 number and my max HR (190) based on the test. Perhaps that is what they are referring to?
The problem with heart rate is that it is not absolute. Heart rate is affected by a whole lot of physiological, psychological, and environmental factors.
LT is highly trainable compared to VO2Max, which is trainable when you first start training, but any further advances after that are very hard to accomplish and is determined by genetic factors.
Then, there's aging. VO2Max declines with age. LT can be improved with age, but will always be a fraction of your declining VO2Max.
These physiological "markers" (VO2Max and Lactate Threshold) can be expressed as heart rate for training purposes, but these heart rates are just a snapshot of the instance you were tested.
Last edited by NoRacer; 02-08-07 at 11:26 AM.