Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38
  1. #1
    Senior Member garysol1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Avon , Ohio
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    BMI for Cyclists

    Is there a simple calculator out there that will help a cyclist figure out his or her BMI that will take into account a certain assumption of muscle mass?

  2. #2
    Banned. Turboem1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    Lemond Reno
    Posts
    883
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BMI is just the relationship between weight and height. It will overestimate body fat in athletes and others who have a muscular build.

    To calculate you do

    your weight in kilograms or pounds divided by 2.2
    then divide by
    (height in meters)2
    or
    [(height in inches x 2.54) / 100]2


    As you can see it doesnt account for anything other then height and weight. It is good for probably 85% of people. The other 15% it not being good for are serious athletes or people with a very muscular build. The best way to find out any useful information is to get a body fat test done.
    Last edited by Turboem1; 02-09-07 at 08:13 AM.

  3. #3
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless you are doing about 10 hours of aerobic training a week, the BMI formula referred to above will fit most cyclist as well (or any other "athlete" doing less than about 10 hours of aerobic work a week).
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  4. #4
    Eternal Cat3 Rookie branman1986's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant TCR2 Composite & 2006 Fuji Touring
    Posts
    1,169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It puts me at almost overweight and I'm a skinny skinny dude. I don't think it works well if you're very short or very tall

  5. #5
    Senior Member garysol1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Avon , Ohio
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by branman1986
    It puts me at almost overweight and I'm a skinny skinny dude. I don't think it works well if you're very short or very tall
    Thats why I posted the question. I am 5ft 8in,33 inch waist and weigh 166 and it says I am still overweight. Thats why I was looking for a formula that may take muscle mass into the equation. I also realize there have been lots of threads on the subject but I have yet to see a real answer to the problem.

  6. #6
    Eternal Cat3 Rookie branman1986's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant TCR2 Composite & 2006 Fuji Touring
    Posts
    1,169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the best thing to do is one of those underwater weight fat% tests

    they're like $25, but at least you'll have a very precise measurement

  7. #7
    Third World Layabout crtreedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Costa Rica
    My Bikes
    Cannondale F900 and Tandem
    Posts
    3,067
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am at just under 25 - which means I am no longer overweight. I have a chest of about 44, a waist of 34 and getting to have very little extra weight. If I can lose another 7 lbs - I should be perfect. yes, I am pretty musclar.

    So, I will be on the high end of okay. Which is fine, since I have a larger frame than average too. (even for someone one height)

    measuring percentage of fat is the only sure way to go - but we can get close enough. Since even thin people don't think I am heavy anymore - I guess I am getting pretty close. But, every pound loss helps on the hills.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    50
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I really wouldn't worry about what BMI. When I weighed 215 at 6'1", I asked my doctor about it.. BMI rating was saying that I was practically Obese , she basically stated that BMI calcuation was for the most part useless, since it only is using height and weight in the calculation. Anyone who has any amount of muscle mass is going to be off the charts on BMI...

  9. #9
    Where's the pack? race newbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    My Bikes
    '06 Scott Speedster S 20
    Posts
    254
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BMI, ShhhmmmeeeMI...get a body fat test it's more accurate for true weight. I have a Tanita scale that measures body fat- it's about 3% too high, but close enough to gauge. I've had a bone scan (like an MRI) and it happens to tell body fat % accurately so I compared.
    "The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must all pay for success." -Vince Lombardi

  10. #10
    Third World Layabout crtreedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Costa Rica
    My Bikes
    Cannondale F900 and Tandem
    Posts
    3,067
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Race_newbie - I have one of those Tanita scales too. I will have to try the fat percentage again.

  11. #11
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by garysol1
    Thats why I posted the question. I am 5ft 8in,33 inch waist and weigh 166 and it says I am still overweight. Thats why I was looking for a formula that may take muscle mass into the equation. I also realize there have been lots of threads on the subject but I have yet to see a real answer to the problem.
    You are right on the edge, dude.

    Here's a link to the scale:



    Apologies ahead of time, because this is going to sound harsh, but those who usually b*tch about the BMI are the ones who should be paying attention to it. Those who know better (i.e., those who know they are outliers) usually don't make a fuss, because the understand why they don't fit the scheme.

    I thought at one time that I was in good shape and I was always athletic and sure, I had a few pounds I could lose. That's the guy on the left. He's obese according to the BMI (200 pounds @ 67 inches tall):



    The guy on the right is at the top of the "Healthy" range on the BMI.
    Last edited by NoRacer; 02-09-07 at 09:22 AM.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  12. #12
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And, this guy is in the middle of the "Healthy" range:

    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  13. #13
    Senior Member garysol1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Avon , Ohio
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoRacer

    Apologies ahead of time, because this is going to sound harsh, but those who usually b*tch about the BMI are the ones who should be paying attention to it.
    Not harsh at all. My issue is this. My wife, my family my friends all say the same thing...YOUR TO SKINNY...QUIT BEING SO OBSESSIVE ABOUT IT!! After a while you begin to listen to them then you look at the chart and see that you should really be 10lbs less then you are. How can that be when your wife and friends are telling you that you are too skinny already? If I were to tell my wife I wanted to lose 10 more pounds she would have fit. I am sure I am not alone in this but in all honestly I am not sure if the chart is correct and should be used as a guide or if I should just ignore the whole damn thing. I know the chart exists for a reason.

  14. #14
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by garysol1
    Not harsh at all. My issue is this. My wife, my family my friends all say the same thing...YOUR TO SKINNY...QUIT BEING SO OBSESSIVE ABOUT IT!! After a while you begin to listen to them then you look at the chart and see that you should really be 10lbs less then you are. How can that be when your wife and friends are telling you that you are too skinny already? If I were to tell my wife I wanted to lose 10 more pounds she would have fit. I am sure I am not alone in this but in all honestly I am not sure if the chart is correct and should be used as a guide or if I should just ignore the whole damn thing. I know the chart exists for a reason.
    I heard the same thing when I dropped from 200 pounds (the guy on the left who is 67 inches tall). My co-workers thought I had cancer. They asked if I was feeling ok. My parents and siblings kept on telling me that I was too thin. But, all it was, was that I got tired of being that guy on the left and wanted to run road races, including the marathon.

    And, yes, any tool should be used as a guide.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  15. #15
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wallybrau
    I really wouldn't worry about what BMI. When I weighed 215 at 6'1", I asked my doctor about it.. BMI rating was saying that I was practically Obese , she basically stated that BMI calcuation was for the most part useless, since it only is using height and weight in the calculation. Anyone who has any amount of muscle mass is going to be off the charts on BMI...
    She probably exceeded her weight according to the BMI too, right?

    Tangent: Here's a clue about weight loss clinics. If the poeple who operate the clinic are fat, then you better look somewhere else for help. The same for fitness centers.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  16. #16
    Banned. Turboem1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    Lemond Reno
    Posts
    883
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is very common now to look at someone who is healthy and think they are way to skinny or to look at someone slightly overweight and say they are a good weight. The average weight has gone up over the last bunch of years and people just consider the average weight healthy not the healthy weight healthy.

    On a side note using the BMI, you have a weight range of about 130 - 160 to be healthy. If I were you 150 would be a very healthy weight to have and keep.

  17. #17
    Lanterne Rouge
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Beacon, NY
    My Bikes
    Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
    Posts
    1,768
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At my height, I need to be under 200 to be considered "healthy". I'm over that right now, and while I personally think taking the fifteen pounds off would be good and warranted, I can definitely see many cases in which someone 6'3" would way well over 200 and be healthy. At that height, with low body fat it is definitely conceivable to be 210 and completely solid.

    Again, I don't fall into that category, so never mind. However, the idea of 160 being the lower range of "healthy" at my height is a bit of madness. I've been close to there once, and I was definitely thinner than was healthy.

  18. #18
    Videre non videri
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
    Posts
    3,202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BMI is an excellent tool - for comparing population averages! For individuals, it's useless and could be very misleading.

    Using the units in the chart posted earlier, I'm 70.5" tall and currently 142 lbs. I'm very close to the border between healthy and underweight on the chart. In reality, I have a very thin bone structure and I have small muscles, so even at this weight, I have a bit of a belly and nothing at all is defined in my torso area. Got tiny love handles as well. I could easily lose another 10 lbs and still not be unhealthy at all, but not according to the BMI nonsense.

    And the other thing, were friends and family tell you that you're starting to look sick and unhealthy as you lose weight, even when you're still overweight or even obese, that's due to one or both of two things.

    1. People have known you to look a particular way for a long time, and they have come to regard that as your normal you. Any deviation from that will be percieved as something being wrong. Not everyone reacts this way, but it's common.

    2. People see your success with your weight loss, and if they're overweight themselves, they don't want you to become "better" than they are themselves, so they will try to make you stop. Probably a subconscious thing, as I can't imagine anyone being that "evil" intentionally.

  19. #19
    pan y agua merlinextraligh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville
    My Bikes
    Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er
    Posts
    27,124
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BMi is pretty useless. I could definitely drop some weight, but by BMI I'm morbidly obese, and I don't think many people are racing with some success that are actually morbidly obese.

    I take consolation in the fact that Brad Pitt is also morbidly obese.

  20. #20
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Arnold Schwarzenegger had a BMI of 33 at the height of his bodybuilding career. Accoding to my BMI and bodyfat math, I'd be clinically dead and missing at least a hand and foot to have a healthy BMI.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  21. #21
    Isaias NoRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Essex, MD
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
    Posts
    5,174
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess you guys didn't understand what I said about "outliers".

    Also, I guess I was wrong about outliers not b*tching about BMI.
    2009 mileage = 14,738 miles; 2010 mileage = 15,234 miles; 2011 mileage = 17,344 miles; 2012 mileage = 11,414 miles; 2013 = 12,169

  22. #22
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Damn right I b!tch about it. I have to have physicals for work, life insurance, and general personal health. Every time it's the same: "I see on your chart you're quite obese." Hey bub you want to pull your head out for a looksie? That silly and pervasive chart costs me time, money, and health care at every stop. Why shouldn't I b!tch? I undertstand all too well.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  23. #23
    Climbing Fool terrymorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    My Bikes
    Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
    Posts
    3,019
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
    I take consolation in the fact that Brad Pitt is also morbidly obese.
    Sorry to take away your consolation, but Brad Pit is certainy not morbidly obese:

    Height: 183 cm
    Weight: 72 kg
    BMI: 21.5, healthy

    My BMI is 18.8, underweight. I am not concerned.
    Managing Director, Undiscovered Country Tours

  24. #24
    Killing Rabbits
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,669
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A good rule of thumb for a cyclist’s ideal weight is 2.0 -2.5lbs/inch.

  25. #25
    Team Kreb's Cycle
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    East Central Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    '06 Trek Fuel EX8
    Posts
    73
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you heard of this one. It takes into account the importance of not having belly fat (predisposer to diabetes, etc.) Measure your hips/butt circumference at the widest point. Then measure your abdominal (belly) circumference at the widest pont. For males if your belly circumference is greater than your hips, it's trouble. For women, their belly needs to be equal to or less than 85% of their hip circumference.
    You're not lost if you don't care where you are.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •