Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-07, 10:52 AM   #1
i ride a bicycle
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Which HR monitor? Sigma vs Polar

I've been looking at getting a HR monitor for a while now (starting to "train" some instead of just "ride"). I just got an email from Nashbar that prompted me to look at their sale page, and they have two HRMs at decent discounts. I was wondering if anyone here has used either of them and could make a recommendation as to which one would be the better buy.

Sigma Sport Shape HRM $29.95 HERE

Polar S150 Heart Monitor $69.95 HERE

Polar seems to be the "name-brand" HRM, but it is twice as much as the Sigma. As a college student $$$ is tight so the price difference could be important unless the extra features of the Polar are useful and make it a significantly better unit.

What do you all think?


sac02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-07, 04:57 PM   #2
mateo for short
mateo44's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What features are you looking for, specifically?

I now the Polar S150 does not compute calories burned. Not sure if the Sigma does.

The cheapest Polar with the calorie feature is the M32, I think. It's the one I have, and I really like it. I think it was $99 at Performance.
<< no sig at this time >>
mateo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-07, 06:28 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Bikes: 2005 Scattante R660 Triple, 2006 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc
Posts: 643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
None of the Sigma HRMs have a function to upload to a computer. One can still enter the information manually, however.

Other than that, Sigma makes a good HRM. The price is much more affordable than a Polar for roughly equivalent features if you don't need a link to a computer based training log.

I have a Sigma PC15, and I like it a lot. It's easy to read and the menus are easy to understand. It only cost me 60 dollars.
Mach42 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 PM.