Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-07, 11:50 AM   #1
Plow13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Plow13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: Lemond Alpe d'Huez 2005
Posts: 1,212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Calories burned

i have a heart rate monitor that will give me my average HR at the end of my ride but it doesnt give calories...is there a general formula where i could use my time, distance and HR data to get my calories burned?
Plow13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-07, 12:48 PM   #2
SSP
Software for Cyclists
 
SSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB
Posts: 4,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
40 calories per mile is a good rule of thumb. A little more if you're big, a little less if you're small. A little more if you're climbing a lot, a little less if on the flats. A little more if you sit upright or the wind is blowing hard, a little less if you're in a paceline or you're down on aero bars.

Most rides for most folks will come in between 35 and 45 calories per mile.
SSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-07, 09:24 PM   #3
ericgu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Looking at some of my polar data (which I think is OK but not great for calorie information - you really need a power meter to get good numbers), I see numbers in the 35-50 range (though 50 is really hard to get). Though I did have one outlier of 15 calories per mile on a really, really, easy ride with my family.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-07, 09:47 PM   #4
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSP
40 calories per mile is a good rule of thumb. A little more if you're big, a little less if you're small. A little more if you're climbing a lot, a little less if on the flats. A little more if you sit upright or the wind is blowing hard, a little less if you're in a paceline or you're down on aero bars.

Most rides for most folks will come in between 35 and 45 calories per mile
.
I read this in a post you made a long time ago. "40 calories per mile" has been one of the most useful facts I've ever learned on Bikeforums. I use it every day to get a rough idea of where I'm at with energy balance. Combined with weekly body weight, I've got a good handle on my weight problem for the first time in my life.

Thanks a million, SSP!!
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-07, 10:26 AM   #5
Fred61
Member
 
Fred61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Bikes: Specialized Sequoei and Specialized Crosstrail
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At what speeds are you talking about for the calories burned?
Fred61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-07, 10:57 AM   #6
merlinman
seattle based cyclist
 
merlinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes: Merlin Extralight, Gios Steel, Schwinn Voyageur fixie
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was just looking at my data for a long ride Sat. I'm at 167 pounds. 200 miles pretty flat, average speed 20mph, calories burned 6,500, equals 32.3 calories per mile. The only time I have gotten up to 40 calories per hour is on hard rides such as an 82 mile ride with 6K feet of climbing - 16.45mph average. On a 40 mile ride I did last week I hit 42.5 cals per mile - that was at an average speed of 17.8mph including a 30 minute interval at 22mph. Obviously body weight affects it as does intensity (hills) not just speed. Most of my recovery rides are at 30 cals per hour.
merlinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-07, 03:19 PM   #7
NomadVW 
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
NomadVW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Yuma, AZ
Bikes: 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike
Posts: 3,172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred61
At what speeds are you talking about for the calories burned?
Speed doesn't mean anything in calorie loss. In fact, it's completely unpredictable. Here's the chart of my calories/mile and calories:speed over the last 9 months (using a powermeter)

Calories/mile is right around 40. I added a 7 day avg trendline to highlight the tops of the bars.
Attached Images
File Type: gif calories.gif (68.5 KB, 17 views)
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-07, 03:31 PM   #8
SSP
Software for Cyclists
 
SSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB
Posts: 4,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadVW
Speed doesn't mean anything in calorie loss. In fact, it's completely unpredictable.
Not quite sure what your point is...but, since most of us are:

a) limited in terms of exercise time, and

b) we burn more calories per hour going faster

Going faster is generally a better strategy for weight loss than "long slow distance".
SSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-07, 06:26 PM   #9
NomadVW 
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
NomadVW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Yuma, AZ
Bikes: 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike
Posts: 3,172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was responding to the question from Fred61 about speeds vs calorie loss. I think the chart is obvious that speed compare to calorie loss is of no use.

The point is, if you want the best calorie loss, go harder, which is not necessarily faster.
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.