Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-08, 10:04 AM   #1
Videre non videri
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cooper test vs reality?

I'm certain a fair number of the people here have done proper, controlled VO2max tests, and some of you may have tried the Cooper test as well.

If you have, how well did the two agree?

I haven't done a Cooper test myself yet, nor have I done any more serious test. However, I entered my time from my best 10 km run, which was just over 47 min (but a bit hilly), yielding 2500 m in 12 minutes. That gives me a VO2max of around 45 ml/kg, which isn't very good, but probably about average.

I'm fairly certain that I could run around 3000 m if I only did the 3 km and was properly warmed up before. That would mean 56 ml/kg, which is better but far from great.

The question is, is the test even close to real-world values, or is its predictive ability similar to the silly 220-age formula for MHR? The fact that it doesn't take body weight into account, while still giving a result that is clearly weight dependent, seems fishy to me...
CdCf is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.