Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Videre non videri
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
    Posts
    3,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Body fat percentage calculation came out strange...

    So, today I bought a body fat caliper. Nice little thing.

    As soon as I got home, I started measuring, and then entered it all into the different calculators on this page:
    http://www.linear-software.com/online.html

    The strange thing is that the percentage came out A LOT lower than I had expected, and lower than I feel is reasonable. But maybe it's correct, I don't know...?

    These are my skin fold thicknesses (all in mm):
    Chest: 6
    Abdominal: 16
    Thigh: 11
    Bicep: 6
    Tricep: 4
    Subscapular: 9 (estimated based on finger pinch, but not far wrong - within 2-3 mm)
    Suprailiac: 10
    Midaxillary: 8
    Lower back: 11
    Calf: 6

    (They're all "averaged" from 2-4 measurements per site.)

    Age: 28
    Height: 179 cm
    Weight: 66 kg

    Neck: 35 cm
    Abdomen: 81.5 cm

    With all this data, you will be able to fill out all the fields on the page, and calculate.

    The first three come out between 9 and 10 %.
    The Parillo method gives a whopping 32 %, which is clearly very wrong.
    The Durning/Womersley gives just over 12 %.
    Finally, the tape measurement method says 16 %.

    Of the six, the tape measurement method is closest to what I expected, but perhaps I'm not as fat as I thought? I don't know what to think...

    What do you all think? Caliper is often claimed to be the most accurate method for home use, and I can definitely say that my skin fold measurements are good enough.

  2. #2
    Splicer of Molecules Nickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    A less cold place
    My Bikes
    Giant
    Posts
    1,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It can be hard to do it on yourself so I would try to find someone that can do it if you want to be sure.

  3. #3
    Videre non videri
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
    Posts
    3,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The only one that's at all difficult is the subscapular one, but even if I double that value, it's only about one percent more in the final result.

    Besides, I don't have anyone else to do it for me.

    And before this, I thought I was at between 18-20 %, so I'm VERY far from what I expected. That's well outside even a massive margin of error...

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    My Bikes
    2008 fetish illustre
    Posts
    876
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As a reference, I'm 72 inches tall and (during race season) 143-144 pounds. I've had my body fat calculated at between 8-9%. You're 70.5 inches tall and 147 pounds, so your BMI (body mass index = weight/height) is only 7% higher than mine. So, in theory, I'd be inclined to believe to 9-12% numbers above. Definitely not 18-20, unless you are extremely sedentary.

  5. #5
    Videre non videri
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
    Posts
    3,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No, I guess they're about right, then. It's probably just that most of my fat seems to be stuck around the belly. I've got very veiny arms and lower legs, but no definition at all on my torso. Not a hint of abs showing (not even the "divide" - the alba linea). I've almost got boobs even!

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by palesaint View Post
    As a reference, I'm 72 inches tall and (during race season) 143-144 pounds. I've had my body fat calculated at between 8-9%. You're 70.5 inches tall and 147 pounds, so your BMI (body mass index = weight/height) is only 7% higher than mine. So, in theory, I'd be inclined to believe to 9-12% numbers above. Definitely not 18-20, unless you are extremely sedentary.
    I tend to agree with this, with the provisio that there are some "fat thin" people who don't look fat but still have a relatively high body fat.
    Eric

    2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
    199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

    Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
    Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •