Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Louisville, CO
    My Bikes
    Felt F75, Cervelo P2
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Body Fat Percentage

    I recently bought a scale that calculates weight, Body Fat, and Hydration Levels, among other things. I did my first weigh in and it said that I only have about 3.9% body fate and weigh about 136 lbs. Now, before you go saying that the scale is inaccurate, I intentionally bought a scale that was a little more expensive and is designed for lean athletes.

    My questions is, is my super low body fat actually hurting my cycling? I will say that my FTP and endurance is definitely on the low side, but I'm not sure if that's from my lack of training, only starting training seriously a couple of weeks ago, or something else.

    Thanks
    James

    BTW I'm only in my second season of cycling and I'm 5'11, in case that matters.

  2. #2
    ..... Jynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    My Bikes
    2006 Cannondale CAAD8
    Posts
    4,823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammonjj View Post
    I did my first weigh in and it said that I only have about 3.9% body fate and weigh about 136 lbs.
    It's inaccurate.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammonjj View Post
    Now, before you go saying that the scale is inaccurate,
    It is.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammonjj View Post
    I intentionally bought a scale that was a little more expensive and is designed for lean athletes.
    Doesn't matter if it was $12,000. The Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis scales are inaccurate when it comes to body fat. They are good for seeing a change over time or other changes but the actual value is not accurate. If you want a valid number get a skin fold test.

  3. #3
    Senior Member jpatkinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    Gunnar, Surly
    Posts
    255
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We bought a Tanita scale for about forty bucks a few years ago. My partner finally got around to one of those expensive water-immersion tests, and it showed him having a body fat percentage of 14.9%, compared to the Tanita reading of 14%. Seems pretty accurate to me!

  4. #4
    ride lots be safe Creakyknees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,038
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dunno bout the scale but if you're 5'11" and 136, you are one skinny dude. Have a frickin sammich, huh?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Terex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Jersey - outside the bibs.
    Posts
    3,457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6' and around 165 lbs. In the "athlete" mode, my Tanita ranges from 4.9% to 7.3%. In the non-athlete mode, it ranges between 10-14%. I'm guessing I'm probably about 10%, but I haven't been immersed. I'm going to get calipered soon and see what that looks like. It is rather unsettling to see the numbers come up as 166.6 lbs and 6.6% body fat.
    "It could be anything. Scrap booking, high-stakes poker, or the Santa Fe lifestyle. Just pick a dead-end and chill out 'till you die."

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Louisville, CO
    My Bikes
    Felt F75, Cervelo P2
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just weighed myself again, this time in the morning, and this time it showed me at 133 and the same body fat.

  7. #7
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, I strongly suspect any body fat reading lower than 5%. That is about as low as human beings can get without expiring. I have heard people claim 0% which means just really lean. They are blowing smoke. Physiologically, it is impossible. Your cell membranes are made of fat (phospholipids). If you had a 0% body fat, you would just fall apart because you would have no cell membranes.

    None of the scales is very accurate. The skin fold is OK for comparative purposes but not absolute.

    I suspect the only truly accurate way is to grind up the person in a blender and render off the fat. But that is a tad bit hard on people so most people decline doing things the truly accurate way. Where has dedication gone anyway?

    Your reading of 3.9% is freakishly lean. Body builders hit low body fat levels but just briefly and they say it is like being almost dead. I suppose it is possible but it is not likely.

  8. #8
    cyclepath daredevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    "The Last Best Place"
    My Bikes
    2005 Trek Pilot 5.0, 2001 Specialized Sirrus Pro, Kona Lava Dome, Raleigh hardtail converted to commuter, 87 Takara steel road bike, 2008 Trek Soho
    Posts
    3,552
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Speaking of scales, I just came in here to look around a bit and search the topic.

    I want to get one. How much does a guy have to spend before you're wasting money on functions you don't need?

    Is a $50 scale as accurate on the body fat readings as a $150 one for instance?

    And what about readings like body water %. Sketchy accuracy on that too?

  9. #9
    sidelined
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    My Bikes
    2005 Scattante R660, Kona Race Light SS conversion, 2007 Schwinn Fastback CX
    Posts
    342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terex View Post
    I'm going to get calipered soon and see what that looks like.
    Caliper test are hugely dependent on the skill of the person taking the measurements...I doubt most are any more accurate than your scale.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    525
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammonjj View Post
    My questions is, is my super low body fat actually hurting my cycling? I will say that my FTP and endurance is definitely on the low side..
    The average cyclist would kill to be that low as cycling is all about power to weight (and knowing how to race, i.e., tactics). That said from what I've read you could potentially compromise your immune system with a body fat % that low as you add training load over time.

    When you say you have endo issues what do you mean? What's happening on your rides? Are you running out of fuel when riding moderate to lower intensities for long distances? How often do you refuel on longer rides?

    Last, what's your athletic background pre-cycling? Were you a distance runner? With a body fat % that low you obviously have genetics working in your favor but I'm sure you weren't sitting on the couch pre-cycling.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •