Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MD
    My Bikes
    2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
    Posts
    841
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    LT as a percent of MHR

    I've been training with a heart rate monitor for about 6 months now. I haven't done much besides actually record the numbers until now. Now I'm trying to make sense of all this data so I can adjust my training.

    I just recently did the 20 minute TT LT test suggested by Friel and came up with an average of 190 bpm.
    My first race was on Sunday and I averaged 184 bpm for 50 minutes without feeling completely wasted afterwards.

    The max I have ever seen while cycling is 202 bpm. I'm not sure if this is my true "max" or not.

    Based on these numbers, is the fact that my LT is 94% of my MHR a good thing, bad thing, irrelevant, or apples to oranges? Or is my max possibly incorrect?

    I'm asking because it seems like other people I have talked to, their LT is a lower percentage of their MHR. Is this another one of those things that is varies from person to person?

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    just another gosling Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Everett, WA
    My Bikes
    CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
    Posts
    8,132
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Varies. Many people are at about 90%. I don't think it's meaningful. Your max might very well be higher. All that said, high lactate tolerance and the ability to burn lactate efficiently is a very, very good thing. Putting in time at LT is what does it.

  3. #3
    ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MD
    My Bikes
    2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
    Posts
    841
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks. That's helpful. All this HR stuff can be somewhat confusing at first.

  4. #4
    umd
    umd is offline
    Banned umd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
    Posts
    28,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is very very difficult and painful to get anywhere near your true max, so I would say you have not seen your max yet. As for doing 50 minutes at 97% of your LT, that is not unreasonable at all. With more training your tolerance will improve and your "pain threshold" will improve and you should be able to spend more time at or over LT.

  5. #5
    But on the road more MTBLover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Volpe '07
    Posts
    863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^ agreed. And, your LTHR will be different depending on your activity. So, if you had actually gone to a lab to get your MHR, and even if it was done on a pedal ergometer, and if you could really calculate your LTHR from that MHR, it would be different from your LTHR on your bike on a trainer. Or your bike on the road on a TT. You just have to resign yourself that your LTHR is just an estimate, that it's exercise modality-specific, and that it will change over time, even from day to day. That's not to say that LTHR training is worthless- far from it, but its variability is one reason why it needs to be estimated periodically, and why the zones are ranges, not single values.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,116
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think if you're training based on HR, what you really need to check and re-adjust zones is LTHR. Friel gives a methid for finding your zones based on that, and if you did Friel's test, you're all set. At this point its not really necessary to determine your MHR, IMO.

    Road Fan

  7. #7
    ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MD
    My Bikes
    2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
    Posts
    841
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sweet. Very helpful. I do have Friel's method for determining zones. Haven't really been using them as the basis for my training. Time to focus my training a bit more.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The point of doing the field test is to determine your LT so you can set your zones more effectively.

    One training effect is to push LT to a higher percentage of max heart rate, so if you see it go up over time, that's a good thing.
    Eric

    2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
    199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

    Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
    Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •