Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-09, 01:18 PM   #1
timster
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
Posts: 840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
LT as a percent of MHR

I've been training with a heart rate monitor for about 6 months now. I haven't done much besides actually record the numbers until now. Now I'm trying to make sense of all this data so I can adjust my training.

I just recently did the 20 minute TT LT test suggested by Friel and came up with an average of 190 bpm.
My first race was on Sunday and I averaged 184 bpm for 50 minutes without feeling completely wasted afterwards.

The max I have ever seen while cycling is 202 bpm. I'm not sure if this is my true "max" or not.

Based on these numbers, is the fact that my LT is 94% of my MHR a good thing, bad thing, irrelevant, or apples to oranges? Or is my max possibly incorrect?

I'm asking because it seems like other people I have talked to, their LT is a lower percentage of their MHR. Is this another one of those things that is varies from person to person?

Thanks in advance
timster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 06:40 PM   #2
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 11,637
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Varies. Many people are at about 90%. I don't think it's meaningful. Your max might very well be higher. All that said, high lactate tolerance and the ability to burn lactate efficiently is a very, very good thing. Putting in time at LT is what does it.
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 06:25 AM   #3
timster
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
Posts: 840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks. That's helpful. All this HR stuff can be somewhat confusing at first.
timster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 11:30 AM   #4
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Posts: 28,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is very very difficult and painful to get anywhere near your true max, so I would say you have not seen your max yet. As for doing 50 minutes at 97% of your LT, that is not unreasonable at all. With more training your tolerance will improve and your "pain threshold" will improve and you should be able to spend more time at or over LT.
umd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 01:12 PM   #5
MTBLover
But on the road more
 
MTBLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe '07
Posts: 864
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
^^^ agreed. And, your LTHR will be different depending on your activity. So, if you had actually gone to a lab to get your MHR, and even if it was done on a pedal ergometer, and if you could really calculate your LTHR from that MHR, it would be different from your LTHR on your bike on a trainer. Or your bike on the road on a TT. You just have to resign yourself that your LTHR is just an estimate, that it's exercise modality-specific, and that it will change over time, even from day to day. That's not to say that LTHR training is worthless- far from it, but its variability is one reason why it needs to be estimated periodically, and why the zones are ranges, not single values.
MTBLover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 02:12 PM   #6
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
I think if you're training based on HR, what you really need to check and re-adjust zones is LTHR. Friel gives a methid for finding your zones based on that, and if you did Friel's test, you're all set. At this point its not really necessary to determine your MHR, IMO.

Road Fan
Road Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 07:50 PM   #7
timster
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
Posts: 840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sweet. Very helpful. I do have Friel's method for determining zones. Haven't really been using them as the basis for my training. Time to focus my training a bit more.
timster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-09, 10:19 PM   #8
ericgu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The point of doing the field test is to determine your LT so you can set your zones more effectively.

One training effect is to push LT to a higher percentage of max heart rate, so if you see it go up over time, that's a good thing.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 PM.