Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Junior Member Sparky2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    My Bikes
    2003 Trek 5200
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Flight Deck and HRMs

    Would like some guidance from riders that are currently using a Flight Deck and a HRM - pros and cons. Currently have the Flight Deck and am considering a Polar 720i. Any “gotchas” on using the two (2) together? Does the speed sensor for the HRM mount on the rear wheel? Any advantage to waiting for the introduction of the 725 in November? I am not interested in the Nokia 5140 application.

  2. #2
    Sloth Hunter Trouble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    My Bikes
    03 Lemond Zurich (Sold) 07 Steelman Custom steel road bike
    Posts
    408
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the two together is just duplicating a lot of information.
    My Flight Deck and S210 provide me with everything I need.
    The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large.
    ______________________________________________________________________
    07 Haro Mary XC
    07 Steelman
    08 iMac 24"
    "One thing I know; that though I was blind, now I see."

  3. #3
    Senior Member NYCommuter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Pinarello Track - Specialized Roubaix Elite - Trek 7300 Fx
    Posts
    113
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was on the same fence, but then I saw that the 720i is down to $260 at performance, and there is a 20% off coupon floating around here.
    So, for about $200 you can collect all the data your heart desires ... in a watch! Then you can download it to your computer and analyse it.
    So I decided to forego buying the flightdeck and only use the 720i. I really like the fact that I will have all this data in one place.
    It is coming in tomorrow......

  4. #4
    Short bus rider H. Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the wireless flight deck and the 720i, and use them both together. If I had it to do over again, I would just go with the 720i and forget the flight deck. The advantage to the polar is you get HR info plus it is downloadable. I can't see any real advantage to the flight deck.
    Always try your most moderate.

  5. #5
    Junior Member Sparky2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    My Bikes
    2003 Trek 5200
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's pretty much my feeling. I like the Flight Deck but the 720i provides so much more. Any problems with setup?

  6. #6
    Senior Member Trek Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    On my bike
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both on my bike. On club rides I have the FlightDeck set to display mileage for use with the cue sheets, and the Polar is set for either speed/cadence or altitude/vertical. The FlightDeck is also set to record time while moving and the Polar is set for total time. I'm a little anal when it comes to information.

  7. #7
    Junior Member Sparky2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    My Bikes
    2003 Trek 5200
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Being anal about information - sounds familiar. Good idea about running time vs total time. I try to keep time at rest stops to minimum. Legs just take too long to recover from extended stop.

    One of the other attractions of the Polar (other than HRM functions) is altitude/vertical. I'm working hard at improving climbing but I want to make sure that I don't overtrain - been there, done that too many times in the past.

  8. #8
    Short bus rider H. Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky2
    Being anal about information - sounds familiar. Good idea about running time vs total time. I try to keep time at rest stops to minimum. Legs just take too long to recover from extended stop.

    One of the other attractions of the Polar (other than HRM functions) is altitude/vertical. I'm working hard at improving climbing but I want to make sure that I don't overtrain - been there, done that too many times in the past.
    I don't think the altitude function works that well on the Polar. It has little relevance here in flat Florida, but my Polar usually says that I'm 100 ft below sea level.
    Always try your most moderate.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Trek Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    On my bike
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by H. Star
    I don't think the altitude function works that well on the Polar. It has little relevance here in flat Florida, but my Polar usually says that I'm 100 ft below sea level.
    You really should calibrate the altitude before every ride. It still won't be 100% accurate but for most people, it will be close enough.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •