Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Council of the Elders billydonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    My Bikes
    1990 Schwinn Crosscut, 5 Lemonds
    Posts
    3,761
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Power Meter Puzzler

    How can you have two rides of equal duration (50 minutes), both indoors on a trainer using the exact same equipment, where you go farther (i.e. faster) on one, yet produce fewer Kilojoules (i.e. less work)? Here are the particulars:

    Jan 24- 12.8 miles, Avg power 127, Normalized power 165.... 413 Kj
    Feb 2- 13.3 miles, Avg power 136, Normalized power 149.... 408 Kj

    Jan 24 ride was a series of 1-minute intervals
    Feb 2 ride was a set of 5 minute intervals.
    PA file.jpg

    Perhaps I do not understand Kilojoules... can someone please clarify?

    There is a time to resign oneself
    to old age and infirmity. You first.
    My Cycling Blogspot

  2. #2
    Stratiotika ktemata
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vero Beach, FL
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Possible explanation #1: power and effort do not increase in a linear fashion, so doing those 1 minute power intervals averages out a little higher.

    Possible explanation #2: those numbers are well within the margin of error.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    4,923
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikephoros View Post
    Possible explanation #1: power and effort do not increase in a linear fashion, so doing those 1 minute power intervals averages out a little higher.
    This. Most trainers are designed to simulate outdoor riding so resistance increases with the square of speed. Putting out 30% extra power will only give you a 10% increase in speed.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    My Bikes
    Dahon Speed TR
    Posts
    942
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or in another way of saying... your burnt energy vs. work performed is not linear depending on level of effort. (Guess that's why you train for efficiency on certain discipline).

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by billydonn View Post
    How can you have two rides of equal duration (50 minutes), both indoors on a trainer using the exact same equipment, where you go farther (i.e. faster) on one, yet produce fewer Kilojoules (i.e. less work)? Here are the particulars:

    Jan 24- 12.8 miles, Avg power 127, Normalized power 165.... 413 Kj
    Feb 2- 13.3 miles, Avg power 136, Normalized power 149.... 408 Kj
    Work (J) equals power (W) times time (s). It doesn't matter how the power was applied; total work is the integral of instantaneous power over the duration of exercise (i.e., linear). For the two cases, 127 W over 49:56 (2996 seconds) is 380.5 kJ. 136 W gives 408 kJ.

    So the question is where did your 413 kJ number come from?

  6. #6
    Council of the Elders billydonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    My Bikes
    1990 Schwinn Crosscut, 5 Lemonds
    Posts
    3,761
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
    Work (J) equals power (W) times time (s). It doesn't matter how the power was applied; total work is the integral of instantaneous power over the duration of exercise (i.e., linear). For the two cases, 127 W over 49:56 (2996 seconds) is 380.5 kJ. 136 W gives 408 kJ.

    So the question is where did your 413 kJ number come from?
    It comes from here... it is from Cycleops Power Agent software. it was attached to my post but here it is again:
    PA file.jpg
    Last edited by billydonn; 02-05-12 at 03:30 PM.

    There is a time to resign oneself
    to old age and infirmity. You first.
    My Cycling Blogspot

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by billydonn View Post
    It comes from here... it is from Cycleops Power Agent software. it was attached to my post but here it is again:
    PA file.jpg
    You can write or publish it as many ways as you want; it doesn't add any more value. What I was asking was how was the data measured, recorded, stored, and manipulated. Errors in any of those could cause errors in the displayed average power and work. In your case, it's clear there's an error in the calculated work. Without examining the data train, there's no way of knowing for sure where that's coming from. You might want to start by checking total work against the product of average power and time to see how many are off.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •