Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member rdtompki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hollister, CA
    My Bikes
    Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
    Posts
    3,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Pedal torque as a function of crank angle

    I'm looking for a reference that describes the torque that a well-trained cyclist applies as a function of crank angle. I don't need absolute numbers, just the typical shape of the curve for a well-trained cyclist. Can be for individual crank or the sum of both cranks. This forum seems to have the best shot of coming back with an answer.

    If someone out there has a recording from a Quark or similar (and feels they are well-trained) I'll take that.
    Rick T
    --------
    Volagi - Triple"ized" and Tubeless
    daVinci Joint Venture

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    323
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  4. #4
    just another gosling Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Everett, WA
    My Bikes
    CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
    Posts
    8,040
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    This is a subject in which I have been interested for many years. Always having been older and less talented than my riding companions, I've had both to train and ride more efficiently to keep up with them. Pedaling and aero efficiency are the obvious low-hanging fruit as far as mechanics are concerned. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on how one looks at it, pedaling dynamics are much more complicated than these graphs would suggest. One's subjective feelings of pedaling may not comport well with these graphs. This article explains why:
    http://www.me.utexas.edu/~neptune/Papers/essr30(4).pdf
    Thus one could knock a cyclist out, clip him in, rotate his pedals at 90 rpm and get pedal force graphs, the shape of which, except for the backstroke, would be difficult to distinguish from the usual graphs which one sees.

    So how do we become more efficient? As you've already noticed, the key to seated climbing on a tandem lies in keeping the power output steady during the pedal stroke. This is the reason that many teams can climb better seated OOP than IP. However, as has been noted on the tandem forum, if one has a partner who is sufficiently well trained on a single, one cannot feel any difference with them pedaling OOP or IP. My method has been to train on my rollers to be able to produce a constant hummmm, without bouncing, at any pedal rpm between 50 and 150. Very simple and very effective. One-legged pedaling on my rollers has also proven effective in increasing my measured climbing rate. YMMV with your stoker!

  5. #5
    Senior Member rdtompki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hollister, CA
    My Bikes
    Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
    Posts
    3,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If only I could get more efficient I'm just looking for a reference pedal stroke for some modeling I'm doing. The info, above, should do the trick. Thanks!
    Rick T
    --------
    Volagi - Triple"ized" and Tubeless
    daVinci Joint Venture

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •