Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-06-12, 12:49 PM   #1
hamster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Is there progression

I've seen this chart in a number of places

http://epictrain.files.wordpress.com...ofilechart.jpg

Does it represent progression or innate ability?

How far up the scale can an average person get with a couple of years of training? Is cat 3 reachable for everyone? Is cat 1?
hamster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-12, 12:56 PM   #2
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,760
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
It depends.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-12, 01:51 PM   #3
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster View Post
I've seen this chart in a number of places

http://epictrain.files.wordpress.com...ofilechart.jpg

Does it represent progression or innate ability?

How far up the scale can an average person get with a couple of years of training? Is cat 3 reachable for everyone? Is cat 1?
First of all, it's an approximation. The riders with the highest w/kg don't always win, but of course those with the lowest are at a massive disadvantage.

Like everything else, it is a combination of genetic potential, training and aptitude. Some people simply don't respond physiologically to training at all, so I'd say that while most might be able to make it to Cat3 levels of fitness/power, it wouldn't be possible for everyone. Getting to Cat 1 takes both talent and application - not that I'd know...
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-12, 02:12 PM   #4
ericm979
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Bikes:
Posts: 6,170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster View Post

Does it represent progression or innate ability?
Both.

The chart is meant for comparing one's power over different time periods. It won't tell you if you have "cat 3" or whatever power. I know a lot of 4s here in NorCal with "cat 2" FTP on that chart.

The power it takes to reach the different categories varies, and of course it's not just power that makes one a successful racer.

The riders who reach cat 2 without too much effort will tell you that anyone can do it if they train, but that's not true. Anyone can do it if they train and have some innate ability.
ericm979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-12, 09:26 PM   #5
tadawdy
Faster than yesterday
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Evanston, IL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,510
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasm54 View Post
Some people simply don't respond physiologically to training at all
Despite what you may have heard, this is true. yes, on average subjects gain a certain percentage on whatever attribute, but there is considerable spread among the subjects around that mean (high standard deviation).

That doesn't mean you wouldn't be able to get better, and you never know until you've tried. There's a lot more to sport than just physical attributes.
tadawdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-12, 01:53 AM   #6
chasm54
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Bikes:
Posts: 8,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadawdy View Post
Despite what you may have heard, this is true. yes, on average subjects gain a certain percentage on whatever attribute, but there is considerable spread among the subjects around that mean (high standard deviation).

That doesn't mean you wouldn't be able to get better, and you never know until you've tried. There's a lot more to sport than just physical attributes.
Sorry, I don't know what point you are trying to make here. Obviously I know it's true, or I wouldn't have said it. "Despite what [I] may have heard? What?

As for being able to get better, obviously one can improve one's cycling skills. But if one's aerobic system doesn't respond to training one is going to struggle at bike racing.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-12, 08:05 AM   #7
valygrl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Bikes:
Posts: 8,295
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
The chart is descriptive, it represents Allen and Coggan's assignment of power/weight measurements to descriptive categories, like "Cat 3" or "good."

You can definitely change you own performance by training. Where you start on the chart and where you can end up is partially up to genetics and partially up to your training.

As to how you can do in races? Well, e-wang size matters but how you use it matters too.
valygrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 PM.