Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    LA/Carmichael high cadence now a myth ?

    Not too long ago high cadence was touted as the way to increase power and efficiency,
    we now know those indidviduals were EPO assisted.

    ANybody been able to stay with lower cadence and still have decent power ?

  2. #2
    NeoRetroGrouch
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "LA/Carmichael high cadence now a myth ?"

    No, but Carmichael always was. - Terry

  3. #3
    just another gosling Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Everett, WA
    My Bikes
    CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
    Posts
    8,523
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    High cadence spares glycogen. If you have the VO2max to ride that way, you can train to increase your cadence and see gains in your speed/endurance. If not, not.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,540
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is no magic.

    High cadence doesn't mean you will go faster than someone that is efficient with a lower cadence.
    fwiw, most people are most efficient at about 90rpms in steady riding.

    If you can spin a big gear, you will go faster. You need to do both (spin+bigger gear=speed).
    That is why motorpacing is a valuable training aid.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,603
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cruiserhead View Post
    ...If you can spin a big gear, you will go faster. You need to do both (spin+bigger gear=speed).
    That is why motorpacing is a valuable training aid.
    I don't get that. Going faster by spinning a bigger gear means pushing harder than with the smaller gear all else being equal. Drafting behind a vehicle reduces the load so you're not pushing any harder than spinning a smaller gear when not drafting. Where's the benefit?

  6. #6
    Don't Believe the Hype RiPHRaPH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    chicagoland area
    My Bikes
    1999 Steelman SR525, 2002 Lightspeed Ultimate, 1988 Trek 830, 2008 Scott Addict
    Posts
    2,585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you read the Tyler Hamilton or Floyd Landis books or any other accounting of Lance's successes you will notice an obvious absence of any mention of Carmichael. Was it purely a business relationship?
    I have enough words to get me into trouble, but not enough to get me out of trouble.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    5,112
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cruiserhead View Post
    There is no magic.

    High cadence doesn't mean you will go faster than someone that is efficient with a lower cadence.
    fwiw, most people are most efficient at about 90rpms in steady riding.

    If you can spin a big gear, you will go faster. You need to do both (spin+bigger gear=speed).
    That is why motorpacing is a valuable training aid.
    Motorpacing may be valuable but that isn't the reason. Regardless of what gear you spin you still need to put out the power. Motorpacing doesn't increase your power.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    5,112
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by lennyk View Post
    Not too long ago high cadence was touted as the way to increase power and efficiency,
    we now know those indidviduals were EPO assisted.

    ANybody been able to stay with lower cadence and still have decent power ?
    There are lots of reasons to use a higher cadence while racing.

    If you're talking only about time trialling and you don't have to attack or respond to accelerations then you need to use whatever cadence gives you the most power. If you have a powermeter it's not difficult to figure out what works best.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sunny so. cal.
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Hei Hei Supreme, 2001 LeMond Zurich, 1991 Fisher Paragon
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had a coach in the early 90s who had us spinning 90 on anything but hills. For climbing, he emphasized 70. That was painful to push a gear at the cadence. Then in 2001 or so, I got another coach who pushed the LA/Carmichael higher cadence. He had me spinning 90 to 100 on everything including climbs. It took awhile to get used to it but I love it now. It's second nature now and it was very helpful when I was off the bike for 2 years and got started again as I had no leg power. I did have some lungs from trail running so that helped.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •