HeartRate zones vs. RPM's
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
HeartRate zones vs. RPM's
I've been working out lately on an indoor spin cycle. As I've been training I've found that I can get into a 85%/90% zone at either a high RPM (110) with low resistance or the same zone at a low RPM (60) with high resistance...often times out of the saddle.
My question is what is the physical difference between those two extremes? I assume that from an aerobic/threshold point of view it doesn't really matter the RPM as long as the heart rate is at the right zone. Is it just a matter of excersising different muscle groups (or types..fast twitch/slow twitch)?
thanks
My question is what is the physical difference between those two extremes? I assume that from an aerobic/threshold point of view it doesn't really matter the RPM as long as the heart rate is at the right zone. Is it just a matter of excersising different muscle groups (or types..fast twitch/slow twitch)?
thanks
#2
Meow!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 6,019
Bikes: Trek 2100 Road Bike, Full DA10, Cervelo P2K TT bike, Full DA10, Giant Boulder Steel Commuter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your first statement is totally correct, you can have the same HR at low cadence and at high cadence in different gears. This is why I like to train with wattage and HR because I can see that I am putting out the same wattage in either situation.
In my personal training I notice that when I really mash the gears it takes a little more muscular endurance to push the higher gear and more aerobic work to spin the higher gear. It takes my HR sometime to end up adjusting to the difference (the typical HR delay). My HR goes up faster with spinning fast then pushing but over time the limits of the two come out around my LT...
It does matter which RPM range you train on, but you want to mix it all up. If you are doing strength intervals (hill repeats, etc), then a lower RPM pounding is going to be better than spinning at a higher RPM. If you are working aerobically then higher cadence seems to work better. My problem with low cadence work is that I tend to end up spinning up if not on a hill which justs makes me push my HR up more. You also need to watch for knee pain when mashing gears. In many situations tough (such as sprinting) you will use both, mashing out of the saddle and then sitting at high RPM.
In my personal training I notice that when I really mash the gears it takes a little more muscular endurance to push the higher gear and more aerobic work to spin the higher gear. It takes my HR sometime to end up adjusting to the difference (the typical HR delay). My HR goes up faster with spinning fast then pushing but over time the limits of the two come out around my LT...
It does matter which RPM range you train on, but you want to mix it all up. If you are doing strength intervals (hill repeats, etc), then a lower RPM pounding is going to be better than spinning at a higher RPM. If you are working aerobically then higher cadence seems to work better. My problem with low cadence work is that I tend to end up spinning up if not on a hill which justs makes me push my HR up more. You also need to watch for knee pain when mashing gears. In many situations tough (such as sprinting) you will use both, mashing out of the saddle and then sitting at high RPM.
__________________
Just your average club rider... :)
Just your average club rider... :)
#3
On Your Right
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 1,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darylw
My question is what is the physical difference between those two extremes? I assume that from an aerobic/threshold point of view it doesn't really matter the RPM as long as the heart rate is at the right zone. Is it just a matter of excersising different muscle groups (or types..fast twitch/slow twitch)?
__________________
"You never fail, you simply produce results. Learn from these" - Anonymous
"You never fail, you simply produce results. Learn from these" - Anonymous
#4
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,404
Bikes: a few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darylw
I've been working out lately on an indoor spin cycle. As I've been training I've found that I can get into a 85%/90% zone at either a high RPM (110) with low resistance or the same zone at a low RPM (60) with high resistance...often times out of the saddle.
My question is what is the physical difference between those two extremes? I assume that from an aerobic/threshold point of view it doesn't really matter the RPM as long as the heart rate is at the right zone. Is it just a matter of excersising different muscle groups (or types..fast twitch/slow twitch)?
thanks
My question is what is the physical difference between those two extremes? I assume that from an aerobic/threshold point of view it doesn't really matter the RPM as long as the heart rate is at the right zone. Is it just a matter of excersising different muscle groups (or types..fast twitch/slow twitch)?
thanks
#5
Just ride.
Originally Posted by climbo
i don't think it matters too much for your HR, but pushing higher gears at lower RPM's will fatigue your muscles faster.