Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Triathlon
Reload this Page >

dura ace cassette - how many tooth works best with 53/39 crank?

Notices
Triathlon Swim / Bike / Run your thing? Drop in our new triathlon forum for the latest in training & gear. From beginner to expert, and sprint to ironman.

dura ace cassette - how many tooth works best with 53/39 crank?

Old 09-21-07, 01:18 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dura ace cassette - how many teeth works best with 53/39 crank?

hello everyone,

im new to the forum and looking for some advise on a new cassette. i recently purchase a new set of wheelsets (reynold attack clinchers) and im looking for a new cassette to go with it. im currently using a 53/39 crank with a 10 speed 12-25 cassette. i dont have a cadence meter so im not sure which setup is idea for me. i usually ride with the larger crank up front and 21,22,23 in the rear.

i've research a lot on tri bikes; felt, cervelo, kuota, etc and they all pair a 53/39 with either a 12-25 or a 12-23. any pros or cons of the two? or maybe a totally different setup all together? a 12-27? 11-xx? is there an ideal setup for tri specific vs road racing?

would i reguire a new chain if i use a setup different from my current 12-25? any advice would be appreciated.

Last edited by arcadiantri; 09-21-07 at 01:24 AM.
arcadiantri is offline  
Old 09-21-07, 03:48 AM
  #2  
Young and unconcerned
 
Treefox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Merry Land
Posts: 4,123

Bikes: Yeah, I got a few.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you're usually in the large chainring and 21,22, or 23 in back, you're probably in the wrong gear most of the time - - and in 53/23 you'll probably be wearing the chain.

If you're finding that when using the 53/12, you need to go further down, then you could get an 11-25.

If you're having trouble on hills even when in the 39/25, you could get a 27-12.

If you never ever ever use the 39/25 (viz. if you never ride on notable hills), and would fancy being able to fine-tune things to get just the right gear a little bit better, you could get a 23-12.
Treefox is offline  
Old 09-21-07, 06:55 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks for the insight treefox. why would a 53/23 hurt the chain? im usually 52/19-23, mostly 21, i just strive for 18+ mph on average during my races.

i hardly drop into the 39 chainring even during climbs, i just push through. probably cause i dont climb too much. i do use the 39, but its with the harder lower gears, never up in the 25.

however, the ironman 70.3 i will participate in will have 1,200 ft in elevation rise, so i want to be prepared for it. so basically, cant go wrong with a 12-25? im leaning towards a 12-23, just hope i wont regret it.

Originally Posted by Treefox
If you're usually in the large chainring and 21,22, or 23 in back, you're probably in the wrong gear most of the time - - and in 53/23 you'll probably be wearing the chain.

If you're finding that when using the 53/12, you need to go further down, then you could get an 11-25.

If you're having trouble on hills even when in the 39/25, you could get a 27-12.

If you never ever ever use the 39/25 (viz. if you never ride on notable hills), and would fancy being able to fine-tune things to get just the right gear a little bit better, you could get a 23-12.
arcadiantri is offline  
Old 09-22-07, 12:07 AM
  #4  
Body by Guinness
 
cjbruin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,326

Bikes: Specialized Allez Pro; Cervelo P2 SL; Tsunami (Converted to Fixed Gear)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I used an 11-23 at Honu & Vineman 70.3's and I'm not a good climber by any stretch of the imagination. I suspect you will be fine with what you have...but don't be afraid of the small ring.
__________________
Fredo, you're my older brother and I love you...but don't ever take sides, with anyone, against the family again...ever.
cjbruin is offline  
Old 09-23-07, 10:43 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,163
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by arcadiantri
thanks for the insight treefox. why would a 53/23 hurt the chain? im usually 52/19-23, mostly 21, i just strive for 18+ mph on average during my races.
What treefox is referring to is cross chaining. The greater the diagonal created with the chain ie Big front chainring and rear cog closer to the spokes puts more stress on the components and greater wear.

Check out a gear calculator such as https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/ and input the cassette ratio and front chainring sizes.

The resulting table will show you the gear inches. 53x23 is only a fraction taller than 39x17 which will have the chain running in a straighter line which means less transmission wear and due to the less friction within the components less wattage required for the same speed.
Dalai is offline  
Old 09-24-07, 12:17 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks for the info you guys. im amazed how there is so much to learn. i really want a much better bike time. anything else i can do to increase efficiency?

people keep saying cadence and im starting to realize the importance. is it necessary to get a meter that reads cadence? i have no idea what are idea gearing combos. like whats a good gear to practice on and to really develop those muscles.

Originally Posted by Dalai
What treefox is referring to is cross chaining. The greater the diagonal created with the chain ie Big front chainring and rear cog closer to the spokes puts more stress on the components and greater wear.

Check out a gear calculator such as https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/ and input the cassette ratio and front chainring sizes.

The resulting table will show you the gear inches. 53x23 is only a fraction taller than 39x17 which will have the chain running in a straighter line which means less transmission wear and due to the less friction within the components less wattage required for the same speed.
arcadiantri is offline  
Old 10-12-07, 11:20 AM
  #7  
Young and unconcerned
 
Treefox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Merry Land
Posts: 4,123

Bikes: Yeah, I got a few.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well try to never use 53x23 or 25 - or 38x12 or 13. Really, you're lucky if you're not getting an annoying clicking noise from the chain against the front derailleur when you're doing this - in most setups you would.

I'm kinda at a loss as to how to explain what a good cadence would be in easy terms... um... faster is better, up to a point??
Treefox is offline  
Old 10-23-14, 09:41 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 808
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I need help in somethink. On my road bike is steel around 27 pounds. I have crank 53/39 and 9 speeds cassete 12-25. Today i had go for ride in bike trail have elevation from 700 feet to 900 feet. With that gears and crank setup i have in flats i was okay i do 18 miles top speed some times little more but when i be on hill i was so slow sometimes my speed had droped to 5 miles per hour. Sometimes i stay on the 53 ring and i go on the 25 i try gain some speed. I do wrong i should i use the 39 with the 25? Or general before i get on the hills i should use the small ring. Finally my average speed in 20 miles ride is was around 12 miles per hour what i have to do for i can improve my average speed. If i try 52/36 crank or 50 34 is be better? Or i should i go in more wide cassete and i had 28 cog, What is the best to do, Go in lower crank like triple 48/38/28 in 52/36 or 50/34 and i keep the 12-25 cassete or is better i live the 53/39 crank and i buy more wide cassete. I want have one cassete 9 speeds give me good top speed and give me low gears too for hills but i want cassete give me good cadence
bobbyl1966 is offline  
Old 11-05-14, 04:20 PM
  #9  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
i have a related question:

i have a 2008 orbea ora with a 50x39 crank, 12-25 cassette (10 speed). the crank was a stock 53x39, but i have since swapped the 53t for the 50t.

i just moved to hilly southern california from flat SE texas, so even with a 50x39 crankset, i am too over-geared for my age (54) and the hilly terrain. looking to make mods to the drivetrain to allow for lower gearing.

contemplating putting a 9-speed mountain (long-cage) rear derailleur with a 9-speed cassette, say. 11-32. also, replace the 50x39 cransket with a new 50x34 compact crankset.

any reason i can't do this component swap ?
adablduya is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stevenpalomino
General Cycling Discussion
28
01-12-16 05:37 AM
brokentelephone
Bicycle Mechanics
13
04-27-13 04:26 PM
clones2
Road Cycling
14
12-17-12 09:47 PM
mystang52
Road Cycling
19
08-20-12 05:04 AM
truckstop
Road Cycling
3
08-31-10 11:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.