Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Triathlon Swim / Bike / Run your thing? Drop in our new triathlon forum for the latest in training & gear. From beginner to expert, and sprint to ironman.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-03, 03:32 PM   #1
waltermi
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wheels go Lighter or Aero???

I have some money put aside to dumb into my bike... Wheels should I go lighter or aero? I want to compete in more triathlons and I've heard that the aero wheels add mph but also add weight... Not sure what to do any suggestions?

Keep in mind I train in East Tenn many hills and mountains...
waltermi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-03, 04:13 PM   #2
deliriou5
It tastes like burning!
 
deliriou5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SOUTH Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 1,014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
aero

weight doesn't really matter too much on flats, which most triathlon courses are. aero does matter though
deliriou5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-03, 09:43 AM   #3
superchivo
Senior Member
 
superchivo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Virginia - just south of the normal people
Bikes:
Posts: 313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
With all but 10,000 or so people in the world, the engine is more important than what's underneath it. There is a compelling case for aero wheels when it comes to drag caused by the spokes, especially the rear wheel. But, if you're not riding in the 20+ mph range, aero wheels probably aren't worth the money.

When I did a lot of Tris, I rode a Specialized Allez with 32 spoke wheels. I would pass a lot of people riding Zipps, Heds and Tri-spokes that were in their small chainring.

(full disclosure: I'm not one of the 10,000, but I still ride a Litespeed Ultimate with a Zipp 440 rear and a light 20 spoke front)
superchivo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-03, 10:39 PM   #4
alb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hey waltermi, I live in East TN also. Have you raced in any of tri's around here? I'd say the majority of them are not too hilly. My guess would be to go with the more aero wheel.
alb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-03, 10:10 AM   #5
Smoothie104
Elitist Jackass
 
Smoothie104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Georgia
Bikes: Cannondale 2.8, Specialized S-works E5 road, GT Talera
Posts: 3,263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wheel weight makes a difference upon accleration, when you leave T1 and at the turnaround mostly. I copied this from the web for you, cause it was eaiser than typing it all out. check out www.analyticcycling.com for more math.


"Let's do a comparison: Mr. Lightwheels weighs 165 pounds, and rides a bike weighing 17.6 pounds. His twin brother, Aero, is exactly the same. Both can maintain 250 watts of power output in a 40K bike leg, and both face identical wind drag, except for their wheels.

Mr. Lightwheels has conventional wheels ? lightweight box-section rims with 32 round spokes. Aero has something like Tri-Spokes. (Pick your choice of aerodynamically optimized wheel; I'm using typical numbers.) Standard wheels aren't much lighter, if at all, than aero wheels, but just for fun let's say the conventional wheels are ultralights weighing 200 grams less per wheel.

In a flat 40K time trial, who will win ? the rider who is lighter, or the rider who is more aero? The answer is the rider with aero wheels will finish more than 28 seconds ahead of his lighter brother.

This includes the effects of the startup acceleration. Even if the bike leg goes steadily up a 3 percent grade, the rider with more aero wheels will win. Only when the grade exceeds 3.7 percent does the bike with lighter wheels have the advantage. And that's 3.7 percent over the whole race, not just the uphill half of a rolling course.

Other analyses have shown aerodynamically efficient wheels are always better, even in bike racing events like criteriums, with the exception of hill-climb events. Even when they weigh more, they are better.

In a flat 40K time trial, the aero wheels would have to weigh many pounds more before their weight soaked up their aero advantage"
Smoothie104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-03, 12:57 PM   #6
bac
Senior Member
 
bac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Bikes: Too many to list!
Posts: 7,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoothie104
Other analyses have shown aerodynamically efficient wheels are always better, even in bike racing events like criteriums, with the exception of hill-climb events.
... and with the exception of cross winds.
bac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-03, 01:24 PM   #7
superchivo
Senior Member
 
superchivo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Virginia - just south of the normal people
Bikes:
Posts: 313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Smoothie,

You're absolutely correct, but you seem to have missed my point - it wasn't that you can be fatter and catch skinny guys if you have aerowheels. IT was that a guy spinning his 39 with aero wheels isn't going to beat a guy who can push the 53. So, be the guy who can push the 53. It might also help to have some aero wheels.
__________________
"I don't want to learn. The more you drive, the less intelligent you become."
superchivo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-03, 01:10 PM   #8
itschris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clearwater, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You can have the best of both worlds nowadays really. Ritchey has come out with their new carbon clincher aerowheels for instance. You may want to give them a serious look. My search for a new wheelset is over. I've already started my slush fund.
itschris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-03, 12:23 AM   #9
Smoothie104
Elitist Jackass
 
Smoothie104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Georgia
Bikes: Cannondale 2.8, Specialized S-works E5 road, GT Talera
Posts: 3,263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Superchivo, I agree with you 110%, see my post in roadcycling entitled.

It's not about the bike.... or the camping equipment.
Smoothie104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-03, 08:30 AM   #10
itschris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clearwater, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hey I made a mistake on those wheels, they're the new Reynolds composites, not Ritchey. The great thing about them is there is no weight limit on them - good news for toads like me.
itschris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.