Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Do you want John Forester Advocating for you?

Voters
99. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I agree fully with his ideas/goals

    13 13.13%
  • Yes, I have differences with his ideas/goals but think the positives outway the negatives

    33 33.33%
  • No, I have differences with his ideas/goals but think the negatives outway the positives

    33 33.33%
  • No, Completely disagree with his ideas/goals

    20 20.20%
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 351
  1. #1
    Senior Member The other Inane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brisvegas
    My Bikes
    Fixed Gear and Cannondaler R4000
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Do you want John Forester Advocating for you?

    First, I am hesitant to post this thread, but I am interested in the general opinion
    Second, this is not a personal attack on Mr Forester
    Third, Feel free to substitute Mr Foresters name for anyone who has the SAME ideals and advocacy position
    Fourth, this is not a discussion on VC though reasons are welcome

    My view
    After reading the "Forester responds" thread and perusing the associated website, I am of the view that while I agree with a lot of the ideas expressed, I would rather Mr Forester not advocate for cyclists in general as the areas that I differ are pretty much deal breakers.

  2. #2
    N_C
    N_C is offline
    Banned. N_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Bannation, forever.
    Posts
    2,887
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I do not want John Forester or anyone like him advocating for me or the interests of cycling in my community.

  3. #3
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,009
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    While I don't agree with everything JF says, I don't have issues with his advocacy. Cycling needs all the advocates we can get and if he manages top keep us visible, then so be it! He's not the Antichrist after all! He just follows HIS passion. The hoohaw about the American Dream coalition, for example....would you rather they never heard anything about cycling and cyclists rights and needs? Advocacy is all about attacking the problem from multiple angles and through any contact or source you can utilize after all....... (and no, I am not a VC Acolyte, I just use a common sense approach to riding and ride defensively).
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  4. #4
    Senior Member The other Inane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brisvegas
    My Bikes
    Fixed Gear and Cannondaler R4000
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry for delay in getting the poll going my first

  5. #5
    370H-SSV-0773H linux_author's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Penniless Park, Fla.
    My Bikes
    Merlin Fortius, Specialized Crossroads & Rockhopper, Serotta Fierte, Pedal Force RS2
    Posts
    2,760
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    - who is John Forester?

  6. #6
    N_C
    N_C is offline
    Banned. N_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Bannation, forever.
    Posts
    2,887
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by linux_author
    - who is John Forester?
    You're kidding right?

  7. #7
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,352
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You didn't provide my answer - Don't really care either way.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I heard that John was a memeber and speaker for the Amercian Dream Coalition, that was the deal breaker once and for all. That militant pro-motorcar organization is actually against the type of infrastructure that promotes cycling in the first place. Anyone who is a member of an organization that is against public transit and dreams that every man and woman in this nation should be able to purchase a single family home is living in fantasy land.

  9. #9
    Dominatrikes sbhikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Still in Santa Barbara
    My Bikes
    Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
    Posts
    4,920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Buried in that lengthy topic, Forester takes on BF, he did write about some advocacy work he had done a long time ago. I was impressed by his description of how doggedly he fought for a bikeway in the Los Angeles river. But he lost the fight and went cynical on the whole idea of good cycling facilities. Sounds like he had been a top activist in his day. It's too bad because now those who he lost his fight with are wanting to build what he wanted back then.
    ~Diane
    Recumbents: Lightning Thunderbolt, '06 Catrike Pocket. Upright: Trek Mountain Bike.
    8.5 mile commute. I like bike lanes.

  10. #10
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,534
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by N_C
    You're kidding right?
    Nope. It is a valid question. Remember most cyclists have no knowledge of VC or the book Effective Cycling. There is no outreach program to cyclists to teach any form of cycling. No bike shop* that I am aware of teaches any form of cycling (well a few may offer "racing" classes.) And certainly there is little cycle training in the public school system. (there are some places that do offer some bicycle training... I believe Hawaii has a program)

    Just as motorists are generally not aware of cyclists rights to the road**, neither too are cyclists aware of their rights... and fewer still know to exercise them.

    Is it any wonder why there is such "confusion" on the road?


    * BTW I tested this by going to several local bike shops and asking if they knew of any classes available to teach safe cycling. Every one said no. Locally there is a series of LAB classes available.


    ** I test this regularly by asking motorists if they are aware that cyclists have rights to the road. The answers would astound you.

  11. #11
    N_C
    N_C is offline
    Banned. N_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Bannation, forever.
    Posts
    2,887
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chipcom
    You didn't provide my answer - Don't really care either way.
    Do I dare ask, what is your answer?

  12. #12
    Senior Member The other Inane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brisvegas
    My Bikes
    Fixed Gear and Cannondaler R4000
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chipcom
    You didn't provide my answer - Don't really care either way.
    Damn, and I tried to cover all bases. Sorry chip, you will just have to join the silent majority.

  13. #13
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,689
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My response would be closest to Tom Stormcrowe's and GeneC's (above). Forester's heart was (is?) in the right place, and he has done alot for bicyclists, particularly in California. (For example, Forester is one of the main reasons we don't have a mandatory sidepath law.) I realize many consider "Effective Cycling" to be the most authoritative text on the subject of bicycling in traffic, but John Franklin's "CycleCraft" is more concise and readable and at least as informative. Forester can be abrasive and tactless at times; I can easily forgive and forget the diatribes, but I think he could be more (dare I say?) "effective" politically if he took a Dale Carnegie course or focused more on a win-win style of negotiation.

    Where Forester, who is my father's age, and I differ most is on our respective views of the practicality of cycling for transportation. At heart, I am still that naive UCLA physics undergrad and member of Earth Action Council who biked to work, to school, and even to the grocery store. I also reject Forester's total distain for the unwashed masses and his belief that we vehicular bicyclists are worse off when John Q. Public takes up cycling. My answer is education, training, and some legal enforcement against cyclists whose practices endanger the rest of us, such as the guys who ride at night without lights, generally wearing dark-colored clothing, or who violate our right-of-way.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  14. #14
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,352
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by N_C
    Do I dare ask, what is your answer?
    You just quoted it.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  15. #15
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,352
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The other Inane
    Damn, and I tried to cover all bases. Sorry chip, you will just have to join the silent majority.
    It's OK...I won't sue.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  16. #16
    Sumanitu taka owaci LittleBigMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The other Inane
    After reading the "Forester responds" thread and perusing the associated website, I am of the view that while I agree with a lot of the ideas expressed, I would rather Mr Forester not advocate for cyclists in general as the areas that I differ are pretty much deal breakers.
    I support your need to be represented by bicycling advocates who more closely represent your views and desires. Not all cyclists are alike--to each, his own.

    Yet you might have asked the question, "Does Mr. Forester represent valid interests of cyclists who believe their views and desires are not being adequately represented by many bicycling advocates today?"

    He does, and so do many other cycling advocates whose views are not in complete agreement with Mr. Forester's. There are valid concerns amongst some cyclists who don't believe that the best approach for all cyclists is to build us special facilities to ride on. We differ on our acceptance of these facilities in some ways, but we all tend to agree that our place on the road is of primary importance.

    Having said that, I prefer that these two "camps" strike compromises, rather than fight each other incessantly.

    Heck, ride a bike together once in a while (ooops! where are we going to ride? )
    Last edited by LittleBigMan; 03-22-07 at 09:49 AM.
    No worries

  17. #17
    Senior Member The other Inane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brisvegas
    My Bikes
    Fixed Gear and Cannondaler R4000
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleBigMan
    I support your need to be represented by bicycling advocates who more closely represent your views and desires. Not all cyclists are alike--to each, his own.

    Yet you might have asked the question, "Does Mr. Forester represent valid interests of cyclists who believe their views and desires are not being adequately represented by many bicycling advocates today?"

    He does, and so do many other cycling advocates whose views are not in complete agreement with Mr. Forester's. There are valid concerns amongst some cyclists who don't believe that the best approach for all cyclists is to build us special facilities to ride on. We differ on our acceptance of these facilities in some ways, but we all tend to agree that our place on the road is of primary importance.
    Actually this is the exact reason I made this poll. I tried to make the choice simple but to give each represented party a category to respond (obviously I missed chip ). Then I provided my own view.
    Maybe I failed, but I still think that the title of the post is the most valid point ...

    Do you want John Forester advocating for you?

    (maybe I should of appended ... in 2007 .... to it, but I only thought of that just now).

  18. #18
    Sumanitu taka owaci LittleBigMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The other Inane
    Actually this is the exact reason I made this poll. I tried to make the choice simple but to give each represented party a category to respond (obviously I missed chip ). Then I provided my own view.
    Maybe I failed, but I still think that the title of the post is the most valid point ...

    Do you want John Forester advocating for you?

    (maybe I should of appended ... in 2007 .... to it, but I only thought of that just now).
    I think Mr. Forester has his contributions to make, just as do others, even those who disagree with him. We all have something to say.
    No worries

  19. #19
    N_C
    N_C is offline
    Banned. N_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Bannation, forever.
    Posts
    2,887
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wonder who voted for the Yes, I fully agree et al. Could it be someone who voted & did not comment? HH maybe?

  20. #20
    Prefers Cicero cooker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
    Posts
    8,422
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted no with qualifications. I'm glad he has contributed to maintaining the rights of cyclists to ride on the road and not be forced onto mandatory sidepaths (assuming it happened as he tells it), and I learned a lot when I read EC in the early days of my commuting. However, I find his style of advocacy to be extremely divisive. He demeans and belittles those who disagree with him, accuses them of being emotional and/or phobic, insists that those who want separate bike facilities (in addition to continuing access to the road system) are being played by the motoring establishment when there's no evidence that is the case, and seems to be completely inflexible in any discussion of the nuances of street riding.

  21. #21
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The other Inane
    Damn, and I tried to cover all bases. Sorry chip, you will just have to join the silent majority.
    It's a lot harder than it seems to cover all the bases. I normally get accused of intentionally biasing polls when I inadvertently do not cover all the bases.

  22. #22
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by N_C
    I wonder who voted for the Yes, I fully agree et al. Could it be someone who voted & did not comment? HH maybe?
    Wasn't me. I voted yes but have differences...

    For this type of poll I don't see the point of making it anonymous.

  23. #23
    Senior Member randya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    in bed with your mom
    My Bikes
    who cares?
    Posts
    13,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cooker
    I'm glad he has contributed to maintaining the rights of cyclists to ride on the road and not be forced onto mandatory sidepaths (assuming it happened as he tells it), and I learned a lot when I read EC in the early days of my commuting. However, I find his style of advocacy to be extremely divisive. He demeans and belittles those who disagree with him, accuses them of being emotional and/or phobic, insists that those who want separate bike facilities (in addition to continuing access to the road system) are being played by the motoring establishment when there's no evidence that is the case, and seems to be completely inflexible in any discussion of the nuances of street riding.

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    San Francisco!
    My Bikes
    2010 Surly LHT (main rider and do-everything bike), 2011 Bike Friday NWT (back-up bike and multi-modal)
    Posts
    903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm with Dahon.Steve and cooker on this one. I learned a lot about Vehicular Cycling principles and how to effectively deal with car traffic when riding a bicycle in the roadways. However, his alliance with the American Dream Coalition and Diane's experiences have led me to believe that John Forester isn't a true bicycling advocate for cycling in the roadways at all.

    So, I picked the, "negatives outweigh the positives" option. Sorry, Mr. Forester.

  25. #25
    Senior Member sggoodri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cary, NC
    My Bikes
    1983 Trek, 2001 Lemond, 2000 Gary Fisher
    Posts
    3,068
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fat_bike_nut
    I'm with Dahon.Steve and cooker on this one. I learned a lot about Vehicular Cycling principles and how to effectively deal with car traffic when riding a bicycle in the roadways. However, his alliance with the American Dream Coalition....
    I view John Forester's speaking to pro-motoring groups that have tried to kick cyclists off the roads as being equivalent to Nixon going to China. Nobody is tougher on pro-motoring organizations than John Forester when it comes to protecting and promoting cyclists' road rights.

Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •