The Division
#1
Sumanitu taka owaci
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Division
The division that exists among cyclists today seems to be not so much about vehicular cycling techniques, but about the controversy over bike facilities vs. road use. Nobody seems to oppose practical methods of road riding, and most people here use the roads, even if they also use bike facilities. Many of us can agree that the roads are useful and essential for our transportation and recreational needs. Many of us also see bike facilities as equally useful and essential.
Where we seem to part ways is over whether implementation of bike facilities will eventually result in our being restricted from using the road. We agree that being restricted from the road would be a very bad thing, but we don't agree on whether that's likely to happen.
The question I would like to pose is whether or not a "hybrid system" of bike facilities and roads is possible, or will the implementation of bike facilities coincide with fewer and fewer rights for us to use the road, if we so choose. Keep in mind that we are already required in some places to use facilities where they exist, and in other places, we have a choice which to use.
What do you say? Is it possible to have both sytems together, or in the long run, will it tend towards having one pure system, either road based or bike facility based? Please support your views with some instructional examples, if possible.
Where we seem to part ways is over whether implementation of bike facilities will eventually result in our being restricted from using the road. We agree that being restricted from the road would be a very bad thing, but we don't agree on whether that's likely to happen.
The question I would like to pose is whether or not a "hybrid system" of bike facilities and roads is possible, or will the implementation of bike facilities coincide with fewer and fewer rights for us to use the road, if we so choose. Keep in mind that we are already required in some places to use facilities where they exist, and in other places, we have a choice which to use.
What do you say? Is it possible to have both sytems together, or in the long run, will it tend towards having one pure system, either road based or bike facility based? Please support your views with some instructional examples, if possible.
__________________
No worries
No worries
#2
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by LittleBigMan
What do you say? Is it possible to have both sytems together, or in the long run, will it tend towards having one pure system, either road based or bike facility based? Please support your views with some instructional examples, if possible.
There is a lot lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth over a few local restrictions that seem to upset a few Internet chatterers who live thousands of miles away far more than any real life cyclists in the affected area. Dwindling numbers of unenforced Side Path Laws, especially in the absence of sidepaths or any plans to build them really is not much of a trend to be concerned about.
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LittleBigMan
The division that exists among cyclists today seems to be not so much about vehicular cycling techniques, but about the controversy over bike facilities vs. road use. Nobody seems to oppose practical methods of road riding, and most people here use the roads, even if they also use bike facilities. Many of us can agree that the roads are useful and essential for our transportation and recreational needs. Many of us also see bike facilities as equally useful and essential.
Where we seem to part ways is over whether implementation of bike facilities will eventually result in our being restricted from using the road. We agree that being restricted from the road would be a very bad thing, but we don't agree on whether that's likely to happen.
The question I would like to pose is whether or not a "hybrid system" of bike facilities and roads is possible, or will the implementation of bike facilities coincide with fewer and fewer rights for us to use the road, if we so choose. Keep in mind that we are already required in some places to use facilities where they exist, and in other places, we have a choice which to use.
What do you say? Is it possible to have both sytems together, or in the long run, will it tend towards having one pure system, either road based or bike facility based? Please support your views with some instructional examples, if possible.
Where we seem to part ways is over whether implementation of bike facilities will eventually result in our being restricted from using the road. We agree that being restricted from the road would be a very bad thing, but we don't agree on whether that's likely to happen.
The question I would like to pose is whether or not a "hybrid system" of bike facilities and roads is possible, or will the implementation of bike facilities coincide with fewer and fewer rights for us to use the road, if we so choose. Keep in mind that we are already required in some places to use facilities where they exist, and in other places, we have a choice which to use.
What do you say? Is it possible to have both sytems together, or in the long run, will it tend towards having one pure system, either road based or bike facility based? Please support your views with some instructional examples, if possible.
The concerns are about the role that the creation and existence of facilities play in reinforcing and popularizing (even more) the following notions:
- Bicyclists are sitting ducks in traffic, having no way to protect themselves from motorist errors.
- It is inherently dangerous to ride a bike in traffic.
- It is stupid and unreasonable to ride a bike in traffic.
- Bikes don't belong in traffic.
- Bicyclists who know what they are doing (practice VC) can reduce the risk to something very reasonable.
- It is not inherently dangerous to ride a bike in traffic, if the cyclist knows what he is doing.
- It is not stupid or unreasonable to ride a bike in traffic, if the cyclist knows what he is doing.
- Bikes DO belong in vehicular traffic, when they are also operated in the vehicular manner.
#4
Striving for Fredness
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,190
Bikes: Old Giant Rincon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
My problem with having too many facilities, bike lanes all over the place, "hybrid systems", etc., is that their creation and mere existence reinforces the first set of notions above, and quashes the spreading of the notions in the second set.
#5
Sumanitu taka owaci
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks for your input, I-Like-To-Bike, HH, and Deputy Jones. These are the kinds of straight-forward opinions I'm looking for. I really do want to know what everyone thinks, and why.
__________________
No worries
No worries
#6
Senior Member
I was going to say... The "hybrid system" is already in place and is evolving, with the network of bike lanes, bike paths, and vehicular street access I have in my local. I believe that all practical solutions to basically all problems are hybrid solutions of various sorts. And neither the doomsayers nor the rose glasses folks are correct and the effect lies somewhere between the two extremes.
...that it's neither one nor the other
there's a paradox in every paradigm.
lyrics of Ani Difranco
...that it's neither one nor the other
there's a paradox in every paradigm.
lyrics of Ani Difranco
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#7
On Sabbatical
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I certainly don't think that bike facilities will lead to a ban of bicycles on the roadway. I just can't see there being facilities on every non-freeway road in America, and that is what I thnk it would take for such a ban to be enacted. And if there were that many facilities... well.
#8
Part-time epistemologist
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
And neither the doomsayers nor the rose glasses folks are correct and the effect lies somewhere between the two extremes.
Although I suspect that there will be extremes across localities and over time. For instance, someone posted an editorial about Tampa and the responses were primarily of the "get off the road sort." In the DC area, there is a strong network of cyclists such that the responses would have been quite different.
Just to be clear, in regards to HH's post, I think that there is a negative component to the supposed "bike path" which never seems to be just for bikes. But I think that the effect is small. More generally, there is an inertia for maintaining the status quo which is a hybrid system. I find it difficult to believe that the present state can be moved much in either direction.
#9
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think there is a reality that is all too easily dismissed by people who promote bike lanes and paths. This reality is that every cyclist, if they want to go anyplace they want by bike, will have to ride on a road with motor traffic and without any bike lane or MUP sooner or later and most likely sooner. To think that every urban environ has not only the physical space for, the need for or the money to construct facilities on or parallel to each and every road is preposterous on it's face.
#10
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by galen_52657
To think that every urban environ has not only the physical space for, the need for or the money to construct facilities on or parallel to each and every road is preposterous on it's face.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A Hybrid system is possible.... as others have said, it's what we have now. I personally think the chance that having facilities will force cyclists off the road is remote, but who knows? that's a fight for the future if it EVER happens. Every road doesn't necessarily need facilities, just as every cyclist doesn't need/want facilities. My hope is that we can get beyond the bike lane debates, as that seems to be the source of most of the animosity around here (that and that guy... what'shisname)
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
#12
Senior Member
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
To be more accurate, such a proposal is really just a big fat preposterous STRAW MAN ARGUMENT made up by Henny Penny's to get hysterical about and shoot down with ease.
Hence, the hybrid part of "hybrid system."
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#13
Sumanitu taka owaci
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by rando
My hope is that we can get beyond the bike lane debates, as that seems to be the source of most of the animosity around here (that and that guy... what'shisname)
It's best to bring it out in the open and talk about it honestly. I think that can be done if we respect each other and agree to disagree. We have nothing to fear from that.
__________________
No worries
No worries
#15
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by LittleBigMan
It's best to bring it out in the open and talk about it honestly. I think that can be done if we respect each other and agree to disagree. We have nothing to fear from that.
#16
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Think of it this way. The folks that ban cyclists from road use are elected. The more people who ride bikes the larger the constituency of people who will not accept being banned from using the road. A hybrid system has the best outcome for everyone.
#17
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by sbhikes
Think of it this way. The folks that ban cyclists from road use are elected. The more people who ride bikes the larger the constituency of people who will not accept being banned from using the road. A hybrid system has the best outcome for everyone.
#18
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by LittleBigMan
What do you say? Is it possible to have both systems together, or in the long run, will it tend towards having one pure system, either road based or bike facility based? Please support your views with some instructional examples, if possible.
1. Guarantee our right to use the roads
2. Implement well-designed facilities and improve those that exist.
Unfortunately there does not seem to be much willingness to compromise among the hard-core on either side, and these extremists ensure that no compromise or unity can be reached. If that continues to be the case, there is only one logical outcome - a pure system of facilities that eliminate our right to use the roads. Why? Because the majority consider the roads too dangerous to ride, and given the choice of facilities vs losing their right to the road, they will give up the right to the road, especially since those who advocate so strongly for it seem to oppose them more than assist them. If we lose our right to the road, no 'side' will be able to blame it other, it will be everyone's fault...the facilities people for giving up the rights of others so easily, and the vc people for being inflexible and making it easy for the facilities people to give up their (vc) rights in exchange for getting their own wishes. There's the cold hard reality in my opinion. Until both sides reject the extremist positions and come to some compromise...the all-facilities option will be the future.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#19
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by sbhikes
Think of it this way. The folks that ban cyclists from road use are elected. The more people who ride bikes the larger the constituency of people who will not accept being banned from using the road. A hybrid system has the best outcome for everyone.
She has seen me cycling and told me I shouldn't be on the road - now that a MUP connector has been built between two parks to cross the freeway, she told me that cyclists should be banned from using the alternate roads. She also wants railings put up on all sidewalk curbs to prevent cyclists/peds from falling into street. Met her at a neighborhood party.
But on average I see your point.
Al
#20
Part-time epistemologist
Originally Posted by Horse
Thing is, the vast majority of our recent bike facilities appear to have nothing to do with effective transportation. What they've been doing is they've been taking wide roads that didn't need bike paths, and replacing them with narrow ones where you have no choice to take the lane, and they've been adding a segregated multi user facility next to it, so you're essentially riding on the sidewalk with stops every time it crosses any street. Also these segregated facilities don't get plowed, so they're useless for a good part of the year - now inclusively. Oh, but the designers were considerate enough to provide the occasional parking lots so people can go ride their bikes...
So yeah, seeing this progression from the old bike facilities to the new ones, well we still have a hybrid system here, but it looks like they're heading in a direction to get bikes off the roads, or at least to make using the roads less attractive and kinda forcing the alternative onto users. The horrible MUPs they've been installing are sure to stay for several decades, and oh you'd swear the people who though these up were on drugs... Obviously, having an anti-cyclist mayoress doesn't help at all. I recall a few months ago she mentioned something about banning bikes off from boulevards... Slippery slope.
So yeah, seeing this progression from the old bike facilities to the new ones, well we still have a hybrid system here, but it looks like they're heading in a direction to get bikes off the roads, or at least to make using the roads less attractive and kinda forcing the alternative onto users. The horrible MUPs they've been installing are sure to stay for several decades, and oh you'd swear the people who though these up were on drugs... Obviously, having an anti-cyclist mayoress doesn't help at all. I recall a few months ago she mentioned something about banning bikes off from boulevards... Slippery slope.
What did the local organization do when these MUPs were being designed and implemented?
#21
Part-time epistemologist
Originally Posted by chipcom
Unfortunately there does not seem to be much willingness to compromise among the hard-core on either side, and these extremists ensure that no compromise or unity can be reached.
If you put those two bullets in a poll for all of the forums, what do you think that "support" versus "don't support" will look like? It will never be 100%, but I think it would be much higher than the vote for any US President.
#22
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
One thing I'd like to see......
A Coast to Coast touring trail away from auto traffic. Now, before I get blasted..this is NOT to avoid the road because I'm nervous about traffic. Instead, I'd like to see a trail that you can run a road bike down and not even see smell or hear a car! Camping facilities along the way and services available. I realize it's totally impractical, but wouldn't it be a great ride?
A Coast to Coast touring trail away from auto traffic. Now, before I get blasted..this is NOT to avoid the road because I'm nervous about traffic. Instead, I'd like to see a trail that you can run a road bike down and not even see smell or hear a car! Camping facilities along the way and services available. I realize it's totally impractical, but wouldn't it be a great ride?
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
#23
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by invisiblehand
The first part of the sentence is true about a lot of subjects. And I doubt that the second part is true in a meaningful way.
If you put those two bullets in a poll for all of the forums, what do you think that "support" versus "don't support" will look like? It will never be 100%, but I think it would be much higher than the vote for any US President.
If you put those two bullets in a poll for all of the forums, what do you think that "support" versus "don't support" will look like? It will never be 100%, but I think it would be much higher than the vote for any US President.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#24
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
Unfortunately there does not seem to be much willingness to compromise among the hard-core on either side, and these extremists ensure that no compromise or unity can be reached.
I think one of the best things that could be done to improve bicycle facilities across most of the US is if those across the spectrum of support/unsupport of the sub set of bicycle facilities known as bike lanes worked together to eliminate the stripe where they have been implemented in clearly dangerous or inappropriate ways as agreed by 'everyone.' - examples as seen in threads such as "Bike Lake Follies"
Eliminating these stripes will benefit all cyclists and would also strenghen the pro-bike lane stance greatly.
Al
Last edited by noisebeam; 03-26-07 at 03:47 PM.
#25
Senior Member
Originally Posted by invisiblehand
The first part of the sentence is true about a lot of subjects. And I doubt that the second part is true in a meaningful way.
If you put those two bullets in a poll for all of the forums, what do you think that "support" versus "don't support" will look like? It will never be 100%, but I think it would be much higher than the vote for any US President.
If you put those two bullets in a poll for all of the forums, what do you think that "support" versus "don't support" will look like? It will never be 100%, but I think it would be much higher than the vote for any US President.
In a different context, I'm pretty sure that most people, with one or two exceptions, will play the part of moderates. In the A&S forum though, with one or two extremists stirring the pot and forcing everyone to harden their positions, there can be no moderates. The one or two moderates left are either ignored or shouted at by both sides.
In this way, one or two extremists can absolutely work to ensure that there is absolutely no compromise. They fight from the wing, on principle, and to fight back, people have to take sides, which means backing into their own wing of extremists, and you have a shooting war. Therefor, no compromise.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter