NCDOT Bike Manual: Streetwise Cycling
05-03-07, 11:03 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
NCDOT Bike Manual: Streetwise Cycling
Here is NCDOT's manual for bicycling on roadways:
https://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycle...e_cycling.html
Does this represent a reasonable description of vehicular cycling? Is there anything disagreeable? Go ahead, tear it apart!
-Steve
https://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycle...e_cycling.html
Does this represent a reasonable description of vehicular cycling? Is there anything disagreeable? Go ahead, tear it apart!
-Steve
05-03-07, 06:54 PM
#2
Non-Custom Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,613
Bikes: 1975-1980 SR road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like some of the general concepts, and it seems VC on a certain level, but it has some dumb stuff too. Like where it says that if a car passing a bike honks, the bicyclist has to move right....yeah....like I should have to drive into broken glass cause some bubba couldn't plan a safe pass....
Also, the talking about how "risky" night-riding is seems a little liability driven.. doesn't NC have a law about contributory negligence? That if you are acting in a "risky" way and you get hit by someone, that you have a harder time pursuing action against them, even if you were following the law and they weren't?
Also, the talking about how "risky" night-riding is seems a little liability driven.. doesn't NC have a law about contributory negligence? That if you are acting in a "risky" way and you get hit by someone, that you have a harder time pursuing action against them, even if you were following the law and they weren't?
05-03-07, 07:16 PM
#3
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Is that the guide you helped with, Steve, that completely fails to even MENTION bike lanes? Pretty big, glaring oversight....
05-03-07, 07:27 PM
#4
Senior Member
I skimmed through it and only found two annoying things (aside from the nighttime riding being risky bit).
1. "If you often get honked at, you may be riding too far from the curb for your speed."
2. "On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. While it won't be fun, the best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing."
Honks are a very bad indicator of how proper your lane position is and a much better indicator of how immature the motorist behind you is acting. Taking the center of a narrow lane is much more fun than getting squeezed off the road or clipped by an impatient motorist. Both of those statements could be worded better to have a more positive tone.
I'd suggest:
1. Most motorist honks are caused by impatience as cyclists are often going slow than motorized traffic. While riding further left at higher speed is adviseable, if your speed is significantly low enough that edge of the road hazards are easily avoided, you may want to consider moving further right to allow traffic to pass without leaving the lane.
2. On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. The best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing. The tradeoff of a few possible honks for a greatly lessened chance of being forced off the road by an ill-advised pass is certainly worth it. In a narrow lane, motorists need to cross the centerline regardless of your lane position so being centered in the lane is not slowing anyone down any more than hugging the edge of the road.
Or something along those lines
1. "If you often get honked at, you may be riding too far from the curb for your speed."
2. "On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. While it won't be fun, the best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing."
Honks are a very bad indicator of how proper your lane position is and a much better indicator of how immature the motorist behind you is acting. Taking the center of a narrow lane is much more fun than getting squeezed off the road or clipped by an impatient motorist. Both of those statements could be worded better to have a more positive tone.
I'd suggest:
1. Most motorist honks are caused by impatience as cyclists are often going slow than motorized traffic. While riding further left at higher speed is adviseable, if your speed is significantly low enough that edge of the road hazards are easily avoided, you may want to consider moving further right to allow traffic to pass without leaving the lane.
2. On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. The best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing. The tradeoff of a few possible honks for a greatly lessened chance of being forced off the road by an ill-advised pass is certainly worth it. In a narrow lane, motorists need to cross the centerline regardless of your lane position so being centered in the lane is not slowing anyone down any more than hugging the edge of the road.
Or something along those lines
05-03-07, 09:05 PM
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I agree 100% with joejack's and zeytoun's comments. Sadly, this is the most positive work NCDOT has ever written about cyclists' road rights. To see our feedback on a much worse work, see this:
https://humantransport.org/bicycledri...e_critique.pdf
Bek should note that Streetwise Cycling was originally written before I moved to North Carolina, and although bike lanes are still very rare here today, I cannot think of any at all that would have existed in central NC at the time of writing.
https://humantransport.org/bicycledri...e_critique.pdf
Bek should note that Streetwise Cycling was originally written before I moved to North Carolina, and although bike lanes are still very rare here today, I cannot think of any at all that would have existed in central NC at the time of writing.
05-03-07, 09:12 PM
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
I skimmed through it and only found two annoying things (aside from the nighttime riding being risky bit).
1. "If you often get honked at, you may be riding too far from the curb for your speed."
2. "On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. While it won't be fun, the best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing."
Honks are a very bad indicator of how proper your lane position is and a much better indicator of how immature the motorist behind you is acting. Taking the center of a narrow lane is much more fun than getting squeezed off the road or clipped by an impatient motorist. Both of those statements could be worded better to have a more positive tone.
I'd suggest:
1. Most motorist honks are caused by impatience as cyclists are often going slow than motorized traffic. While riding further left at higher speed is adviseable, if your speed is significantly low enough that edge of the road hazards are easily avoided, you may want to consider moving further right to allow traffic to pass without leaving the lane.
2. On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. The best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing. The tradeoff of a few possible honks for a greatly lessened chance of being forced off the road by an ill-advised pass is certainly worth it. In a narrow lane, motorists need to cross the centerline regardless of your lane position so being centered in the lane is not slowing anyone down any more than hugging the edge of the road.
Or something along those lines
1. "If you often get honked at, you may be riding too far from the curb for your speed."
2. "On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. While it won't be fun, the best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing."
Honks are a very bad indicator of how proper your lane position is and a much better indicator of how immature the motorist behind you is acting. Taking the center of a narrow lane is much more fun than getting squeezed off the road or clipped by an impatient motorist. Both of those statements could be worded better to have a more positive tone.
I'd suggest:
1. Most motorist honks are caused by impatience as cyclists are often going slow than motorized traffic. While riding further left at higher speed is adviseable, if your speed is significantly low enough that edge of the road hazards are easily avoided, you may want to consider moving further right to allow traffic to pass without leaving the lane.
2. On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. The best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing. The tradeoff of a few possible honks for a greatly lessened chance of being forced off the road by an ill-advised pass is certainly worth it. In a narrow lane, motorists need to cross the centerline regardless of your lane position so being centered in the lane is not slowing anyone down any more than hugging the edge of the road.
Or something along those lines
This, folks, is an assessment that could only be produced by a vehicular cyclist, someone who believes, deep down, in his equal right to the road: same rules, same rights.
05-03-07, 09:14 PM
#7
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
oh well, it sounds like NC doesn't really want to encourage cycling as transportation with bike-specific infrastructure.
keep the roads the domain of the good ol boys and savvy cyclists ballsy enough, for example, to take the lane in the face of 45 mph traffic with kids in tow- OH, something you DON'T DO for that half mile ride to the ice cream store, steve......
keep the roads the domain of the good ol boys and savvy cyclists ballsy enough, for example, to take the lane in the face of 45 mph traffic with kids in tow- OH, something you DON'T DO for that half mile ride to the ice cream store, steve......
05-03-07, 09:39 PM
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Bekologist
oh well, it sounds like NC doesn't really want to encourage cycling as transportation with bike-specific infrastructure.
keep the roads the domain of the good ol boys and savvy cyclists ballsy enough, for example, to take the lane in the face of 45 mph traffic with kids in tow- OH, something you DON'T DO for that half mile ride to the ice cream store, steve......
keep the roads the domain of the good ol boys and savvy cyclists ballsy enough, for example, to take the lane in the face of 45 mph traffic with kids in tow- OH, something you DON'T DO for that half mile ride to the ice cream store, steve......
I also lead beginning rides and try to promote cycling by beginners. Nobody seriously doubts that I want to help more people enjoy cycling. You dishonestly accuse me otherwise only because I don't advocate your favorite marketing technique. Such weak attacks only diminish your credibility.
05-03-07, 09:56 PM
#9
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
steve, I'm dissing on North Carolina, not you, buddy.
you dishonestly calling bike specific infrastructure a 'marketing technique' just undermines YOUR cred.
but I did notice your state doesn't mention it in their biking manual; and the lack of bike specific infrastructure in North carolina will likely keep transportational cycling DOWN in your state, despite your VC-addled analysis.
you dishonestly calling bike specific infrastructure a 'marketing technique' just undermines YOUR cred.
but I did notice your state doesn't mention it in their biking manual; and the lack of bike specific infrastructure in North carolina will likely keep transportational cycling DOWN in your state, despite your VC-addled analysis.
05-04-07, 05:36 AM
#10
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Bekologist
Is that the guide you helped with, Steve, that completely fails to even MENTION bike lanes? Pretty big, glaring oversight....
05-04-07, 08:01 AM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Bekologist
you dishonestly calling bike specific infrastructure a 'marketing technique' just undermines YOUR cred.
but I did notice your state doesn't mention it in their biking manual; and the lack of bike specific infrastructure in North carolina will likely keep transportational cycling DOWN in your state, despite your VC-addled analysis.
but I did notice your state doesn't mention it in their biking manual; and the lack of bike specific infrastructure in North carolina will likely keep transportational cycling DOWN in your state, despite your VC-addled analysis.
05-04-07, 01:41 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sggoodri
Here is NCDOT's manual for bicycling on roadways:
https://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycle...e_cycling.html
Does this represent a reasonable description of vehicular cycling? Is there anything disagreeable? Go ahead, tear it apart!
-Steve
https://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycle...e_cycling.html
Does this represent a reasonable description of vehicular cycling? Is there anything disagreeable? Go ahead, tear it apart!
-Steve
05-04-07, 01:52 PM
#14
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
I skimmed through it and only found two annoying things (aside from the nighttime riding being risky bit).
1. "If you often get honked at, you may be riding too far from the curb for your speed."
2. "On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. While it won't be fun, the best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing."
Honks are a very bad indicator of how proper your lane position is and a much better indicator of how immature the motorist behind you is acting. Taking the center of a narrow lane is much more fun than getting squeezed off the road or clipped by an impatient motorist. Both of those statements could be worded better to have a more positive tone.
I'd suggest:
1. Most motorist honks are caused by impatience as cyclists are often going slow than motorized traffic. While riding further left at higher speed is adviseable, if your speed is significantly low enough that edge of the road hazards are easily avoided, you may want to consider moving further right to allow traffic to pass without leaving the lane.
2. On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. The best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing. The tradeoff of a few possible honks for a greatly lessened chance of being forced off the road by an ill-advised pass is certainly worth it. In a narrow lane, motorists need to cross the centerline regardless of your lane position so being centered in the lane is not slowing anyone down any more than hugging the edge of the road.
Or something along those lines
1. "If you often get honked at, you may be riding too far from the curb for your speed."
2. "On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. While it won't be fun, the best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing."
Honks are a very bad indicator of how proper your lane position is and a much better indicator of how immature the motorist behind you is acting. Taking the center of a narrow lane is much more fun than getting squeezed off the road or clipped by an impatient motorist. Both of those statements could be worded better to have a more positive tone.
I'd suggest:
1. Most motorist honks are caused by impatience as cyclists are often going slow than motorized traffic. While riding further left at higher speed is adviseable, if your speed is significantly low enough that edge of the road hazards are easily avoided, you may want to consider moving further right to allow traffic to pass without leaving the lane.
2. On a very narrow road (10-foot-wide lanes for example), riding near the edge can encourage motorists to pass unsafely. The best approach is to ride a straight line far enough from the curb to discourage unsafe passing. The tradeoff of a few possible honks for a greatly lessened chance of being forced off the road by an ill-advised pass is certainly worth it. In a narrow lane, motorists need to cross the centerline regardless of your lane position so being centered in the lane is not slowing anyone down any more than hugging the edge of the road.
Or something along those lines
