Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 82
  1. #1
    Sophomoric Member Roody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dancing in Lansing
    Posts
    20,769
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Outsider's view of the bike lane debate: "One guy ruined it for all the other guys."

    A friend at work--a non-cyclist--attended a city planning meeting for East Lansing, MI. This was his account of the meeting, as near to how he said it as I can manage:

    A bunch of bike guys were at the meeting and they'd been trying to get the city to put a bike lane on Hagadorn Rd. You know, that's a busy road and the bike guys don't like to ride on it. The city had finally agreed in principle to do it.

    But this one bike guy was at the meeting. This guy always rides in the car lanes. He's some kind of fanatic or something. Even when he's riding on Abbot Rd. where they already have a bike lane, he refuses to ride in it. He has to ride in the car lane and he's always holding up the traffic. I got behind him one time and he really pissed me off.

    Anyway, he was arguing that they shouldn't have any bike lanes anywhere in the city. This one guy thinks the bikes should just ride wherever they want to, even if they're getting in the way of the cars. Like I said, he's some kind of fanatic, I guess. So the city scrapped the whole plan to put in a bike lane on Hagadorn. Now they're talking about not putting any bike lanes in the whole city. So, all the other bike guys were yelling and shouting at this one bike guy. One guy ruined it for everybody.

    It was fascinating to hear one outsider's view of this whole debate. I think I was more confused about the bike lane issue after I heard this.


    "Think Outside the Cage"

  2. #2
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yep, sounds like a rabid foresterite getting in the way of increasing bike infrastructure in communities.

    the foresterites should be ashamed of themselves. our local 'advocate' stoops to talking to radio shock jockeys about mandatory cyclist liscensing.

    I've seen him riding on the MUP's to get around town - what a hypocrite.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  3. #3
    Senior Member Denny Koll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roody
    A friend at work--a non-cyclist--attended a city planning meeting for East Lansing, MI. This was his account of the meeting, as near to how he said it as I can manage:

    A bunch of bike guys were at the meeting and they'd been trying to get the city to put a bike lane on Hagadorn Rd. You know, that's a busy road and the bike guys don't like to ride on it. The city had finally agreed in principle to do it.

    But this one bike guy was at the meeting. This guy always rides in the car lanes. He's some kind of fanatic or something. Even when he's riding on Abbot Rd. where they already have a bike lane, he refuses to ride in it. He has to ride in the car lane and he's always holding up the traffic. I got behind him one time and he really pissed me off.

    Anyway, he was arguing that they shouldn't have any bike lanes anywhere in the city. This one guy thinks the bikes should just ride wherever they want to, even if they're getting in the way of the cars. Like I said, he's some kind of fanatic, I guess. So the city scrapped the whole plan to put in a bike lane on Hagadorn. Now they're talking about not putting any bike lanes in the whole city. So, all the other bike guys were yelling and shouting at this one bike guy. One guy ruined it for everybody.

    It was fascinating to hear one outsider's view of this whole debate. I think I was more confused about the bike lane issue after I heard this.
    Hagadorn runs right beside MSU campus and there is a lot of bike traffic on campus. Seems like a great place for a bike lane and great tiiming since it is under construction right now.

    Too bad that bonehead cyclist was too self absorbed to see that the world extends beyond him and his theories....what a shame.

  4. #4
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    being that vehicular cyclists can use a bike lane in a vehicular manner, and bike lanes and vehicular cycling are not mutually exclusive, i'd say the anti-accomodationalists don't have a pot to piss in.

    the rabid, foresterite anti-accomodationalists should be ashamed of themselves.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  5. #5
    Sophomoric Member Roody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dancing in Lansing
    Posts
    20,769
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Denny Koll
    Hagadorn runs right beside MSU campus and there is a lot of bike traffic on campus. Seems like a great place for a bike lane and great tiiming since it is under construction right now.

    Too bad that bonehead cyclist was too self absorbed to see that the world extends beyond him and his theories....what a shame
    .
    Keep in mind that this was my friend's recollection of the meeting. I doubt if East Lansing will actually base their alternative transportation policy on the opinions of one cyclist.

    Do you happen to know what accommodations for cyclists will be made on the new Hagadorn bridge over the Red Cedar River, just south of the Grand River Ave. intersection?


    "Think Outside the Cage"

  6. #6
    Senior Member Denny Koll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roody
    Keep in mind that this was my friend's recollection of the meeting. I doubt if East Lansing will actually base their alternative transportation policy on the opinions of one cyclist.

    Do you happen to know what accommodations for cyclists will be made on the new Hagadorn bridge over the Red Cedar River, just south of the Grand River Ave. intersection?
    No..I don't know. I'm not from Lansing but my daughter attends MSU.

  7. #7
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So motorist do believe bike lanes are there to get cyclist out of their way. And if the cyclist is not in the designated place they should be in, the motorist gets all pissed off.

  8. #8
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Everyone hates him, yet, this one simple cyclist destroyed the whole plan. Imagine the power he has!

  9. #9
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    interesting...
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  10. #10
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roody
    It was fascinating to hear one outsider's view of this whole debate. I think I was more confused about the bike lane issue after I heard this.
    Motorist are not really outsiders. Many cyclist have known for a very long time that bike lanes were invented to get cyclist off the road and out of motorist way.

  11. #11
    Senior Member sggoodri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cary, NC
    My Bikes
    1983 Trek, 2001 Lemond, 2000 Gary Fisher
    Posts
    3,068
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CB HI
    So motorist do believe bike lanes are there to get cyclist out of their way. And if the cyclist is not in the designated place they should be in, the motorist gets all pissed off.
    Motorists often fail to appreciate effects of the glass and gravel that so often comes with a bike lane stripe; meanwhile, bike lane advocates often fail to appreciate the effects of increased pavement width when it comes without one.

  12. #12
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sggoodri
    Motorists often fail to appreciate effects of the glass and gravel that so often comes with a bike lane stripe; meanwhile, bike lane advocates often fail to appreciate the effects of increased pavement width when it comes without one.
    So true, Steven, so true!

  13. #13
    Sophomoric Member Roody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dancing in Lansing
    Posts
    20,769
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CB HI
    Motorist are not really outsiders. Many cyclist have known for a very long time that bike lanes were invented to get cyclist off the road and out of motorist way.
    I don't know why bike lanes were invented. But most people assume they were invented in order to scoot bikes out of the way. About the only people who don't think that are the cycling advocates.


    "Think Outside the Cage"

  14. #14
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would refine you classification as the "bike lane cycling advocates".

  15. #15
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    more like 'populist infrastructure cycling advocates'

    anti-accomodationalists are anti-populist.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  16. #16
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As has been repeatedly pointed out to you, the only facilities VC'ers oppose are:
    dangerous bike lanes
    and those bike path designs that are dangerous to cyclist.

    Amazing how you have such a hard time comprehending such a simple statement.

  17. #17
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    sounds like this guy in East Lansing was an "obstructionist", dude.

    an "anti-accomodation" foresterite.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  18. #18
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The dog chasing his tail again.

  19. #19
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what ARE you talking about?

    the fool at the East Lansing council meeting definetly sounds like a foresterite 'obstructionist'. inadverdanetly keeping bikes down by insisting in autocentrism.

    the foresterite obstructionists should be ashamed of themselves. vehicular cyclists can ride in a bike lane. vehicular cyclists can take advantage of bike lane networks in communities.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  20. #20
    Senior Member Denny Koll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bekologist
    what ARE you talking about?

    the fool at the East Lansing council meeting definetly sounds like a foresterite 'obstructionist'. inadverdanetly keeping bikes down by insisting in autocentrism.

    the foresterite obstructionists should be ashamed of themselves. vehicular cyclists can ride in a bike lane. vehicular cyclists can take advantage of bike lane networks in communities.

    There was a thread a few months ago regarding a forum member who was opposed to building a MUP close to her home. It would be used by "Freds" and older slower cyclists. According to her these folks "should be" riding in the road...and an MUP would force her off the road.

    A bike lane might not be the same but the thinking is similar. Less choices for other less important cyclists because it doesn't fit the agenda.

  21. #21
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    STFD/STFU
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CB HI
    The dog chasing his tail again.
    Can you please explain how his comment was like a dog chasing its tail? I've seen you use this phrase before and it didn't make sense then either.
    as far as I can tell, it is the VC advocates that resemble a dog chasing its tail. No matter how much preaching, complaining, "advocating" and belittleing they do, bike lanes still get built and cyclists want to use them. So the VC advocates are getting nowhere, hence, dog chasing its tail.

  22. #22
    CRIKEY!!!!!!! Cyclaholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,270
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CB HI
    Many cyclist have known for a very long time that bike lanes were invented to get cyclist off the road and out of motorist way.
    A cycling facility that gets me out of the way of a motorist that may or may not be sober/drugged/competent/roadworthy(vehichle)/texting/fixing makeup/reading the paper/tuning the radio/a million other distractions other than concentrating on the road ahead?

    Sounds like a great idea to me.
    There are 10 types of people in the world - the ones that can count in base 2, the ones that can't count in base 2, and the ones that didn't expect this to be in base 3.

  23. #23
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,973
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This so called 'fanantic' does not sound like a vehicular cyclist. Most VCists will move aside when safe and practical to let faster traffic pass.

    It is also telling that the person who relayed the story called the vehicular lanes "car lanes"

    Al

  24. #24
    Senior Member sggoodri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cary, NC
    My Bikes
    1983 Trek, 2001 Lemond, 2000 Gary Fisher
    Posts
    3,068
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by noisebeam
    This so called 'fanantic' does not sound like a vehicular cyclist. Most VCists will move aside when safe and practical to let faster traffic pass.

    It is also telling that the person who relayed the story called the vehicular lanes "car lanes"

    Al
    The cyclist who was riding outside the bike lane probably wasn't even taking the lane. Staying just an inch outside the bike lane to avoid debris is enough to set off some motorists.

  25. #25
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,973
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What is/was the proposal for the bike lane?

    -Adding more pavement width for the added bike lane?
    -Adding a stripe with no other lane changes? (changing a wide lane into a narrow lane with a bike lane)
    -Removing a 'vehicular lane' and striping a bike lane? (i.e. 'road diet')

    Al

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •