Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > > >

Vehicular Cycling (VC) No other subject has polarized the A&S members like VC has. Here's a place to share, debate, and educate.

View Poll Results: When commuting, would you prefer a bike lane or not?
Yes, I prefer a bike lane 27 36.00%
No, I prefer to ride along with the traffic (bike lanes are dangerous) 13 17.33%
I don't care. I'll use whatever is available. 35 46.67%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-08, 01:47 AM   #1
macteacher
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Suburbia, Ontario
Bikes: Specialized FSR
Posts: 882
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bike Lanes - commuter poll

With the recent discussions on bike lanes, I am curious to get a sampling of peoples feeling s with respect to bike lanes. I know some people hate them and some love them. Lets see what the numbers say.

Last edited by macteacher; 02-09-08 at 08:42 AM.
macteacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 02:07 AM   #2
JeffS
not a role model
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes:
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why add the dangerous comment to the second option? That preference and opinion do not necessarily go together.
JeffS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 02:12 AM   #3
jaxgtr
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Bikes: Trek ALR 6, Trek CrossRip, Trek X-Caliber 8
Posts: 4,354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Moved to VC
__________________
Brian | 2015 Trek Emonda ALR 6 | 2015 Trek X-Caliber 8 | 2014 Trek CrossRip Comp
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEO View Post
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.
jaxgtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 05:42 AM   #4
enbuyukfener
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Bikes: Dunlop Expedition (in terrible shape)
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffS View Post
Why add the dangerous comment to the second option? That preference and opinion do not necessarily go together.
Bike lanes are often in the car door zone and can be problematic just before intersections where the road changes from [parking, bike lane, car lane] > [two car lanes]. Combined with people speeding up for yellow lights, it can be dangerous. Also, they give a false sense of security sometimes especially when morons drive into the bike lane unexpectedly or early for turns. But of course, they are much better than no bike lane.

As for me, I don't mind. Usually lanes are wide enough to fit me and a car even if it's not legal (I'm not the one breaking the law though).
enbuyukfener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 08:43 AM   #5
macteacher
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Suburbia, Ontario
Bikes: Specialized FSR
Posts: 882
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I added the dangerous comment, because people who don't ride in bike lanes often suggest they are dangerous
macteacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 08:45 AM   #6
-=(8)=-
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Posts: 7,903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I voted 'bike lanes' but it really it depends entirely on the prevailing mindset
of that areas population.
In Vermont or MAine, bike lanes are usually unnecessary.
In a lot of the southern states, SC and FL etc, they are a
necessity.
__________________
-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
-=(8)=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 09:09 AM   #7
iltb-2
Still Around
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by macteacher View Post
I added the dangerous comment, because people who don't ride in bike lanes often suggest they are dangerous
And some people who ride in bike lanes suggest that to ride otherwise is dangerous. So if you want to gain any knowledge by way of polling why not delete this poorly worded poll with its bias loaded responses and start over?
iltb-2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 09:09 AM   #8
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
statistically, major roads with bike lanes are safer than major roads without bike lanes; the League of American Bicyclists considers an experienced bicyclist riding on roads with bike lanes to be the safest road bicycling scenario; infrastructure adds bicyclists and makes bicycling more visible in a community;

Only fools and forstorites would vote against well implemented bike infrastructure.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 09:45 AM   #9
rando
Senior Member
 
rando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Bikes:
Posts: 2,967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ride in bike lanes, I ride on roads, I ride on sidewalks. I use every option available to me. I would ride the busier roads more often maybe if they had bike lanes...
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen

Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
rando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 11:24 AM   #10
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 9,935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
I responded that "I don't care" but I think that response needs clarification. Bike lanes, just like shoulders, denote extra paved width outside of the main traffic lanes. If I can use that space to allow faster traffic to pass without causing any negative effects to myself, then I do. If not, then I don't. Same goes for a wide outside lane, the only difference being that that space is not clearly marked as being outside of the normally travelled roadway width.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 12:54 PM   #11
balindamood 
Wrench Savant
 
balindamood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 61 Degrees North
Bikes: www.2nd-cycles.com
Posts: 2,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
FWIW, I prefer bike lane when the posted speed is over 30 mph, but I voted for using whatever is available.
__________________
"Where you come from is gone;
where you are headed weren't never there;
and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it."
balindamood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 01:27 PM   #12
John Forester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by macteacher View Post
With the recent discussions on bike lanes, I am curious to get a sampling of peoples feeling s with respect to bike lanes. I know some people hate them and some love them. Lets see what the numbers say.
As always in most of these discussions, the question fails to state the conditions. The question should apply to only the painted stripe, no other variables, and it does not so limit itself. Therefore, the answers are irrelevant because they probably reflect different experiences on different streets.
John Forester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-08, 06:12 PM   #13
gcottay
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
Posts: 3,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It all depends on the details.
gcottay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-08, 03:52 AM   #14
enbuyukfener
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Bikes: Dunlop Expedition (in terrible shape)
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iltb-2 View Post
And some people who ride in bike lanes suggest that to ride otherwise is dangerous. So if you want to gain any knowledge by way of polling why not delete this poorly worded poll with its bias loaded responses and start over?
I think you are misunderstanding. The poll options are supposed to be read by the reader as applicable to them, i.e. the "bike lanes are dangerous" is supposed to be an option for those that think that, it's not from the author's bias.
enbuyukfener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-08, 09:13 PM   #15
e0richt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hammonton, NJ
Bikes: Dawes Lightning sport, Trek 1220, Trek 7100
Posts: 985
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
actually, I prefer wide shoulders... if not wide shoulders then bike lanes, with one caveat... I don't want to
be "forced" into a bike lane by law if the bike lane becomes a safety liability...
e0richt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-08, 09:55 PM   #16
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
As always in most of these discussions, the question fails to state the conditions. The question should apply to only the painted stripe, no other variables, and it does not so limit itself. Therefore, the answers are irrelevant because they probably reflect different experiences on different streets.
I'm sure there are more than a few real-life road 'conditions' where a curbhugger like john would appreciate a well implemented bike lane.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-08, 08:29 PM   #17
LittleBigMan
Sumanitu taka owaci
 
LittleBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ride wherever there is good pavement. If there's a bike lane, I'll ride in it, so long as it's good pavement. If I have to leave the bike lane to find good pavement, I'll do it.

Most of my commute is not "bike laned." I use what exists.

__________________
No worries
LittleBigMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 10:35 AM   #18
VintageRaleigh
Senior Member
 
VintageRaleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I like bike lanes because they give you defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on
VintageRaleigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 11:07 AM   #19
Helmet Head
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Bikes:
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VintageRaleigh View Post
I like bike lanes because they give you defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on
How is that different from pavement that is not demarcated as a bike lane on which you are riding?
Helmet Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 11:10 AM   #20
-=(8)=-
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Posts: 7,903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess you didnt see this part of that sentance :

"they give you defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on"
__________________
-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
-=(8)=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 11:31 AM   #21
Helmet Head
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Bikes:
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -=Łem in Pa=- View Post
I guess you didnt see this part of that sentance :

"they give you defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on"
I saw it. That was my point. I guess I have to explain it in more detail.

Riding in the traffic lane also gives a "defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on". If you choose a sharing position in a wide lane, that defines a territory that "most motorists are quite good about not intruding on". If you choose a controlling position, that defines the entire traffic lane as a territory "most motorists are quite good about not intruding on".

I know that if you're curb hugging in narrow lanes the "defined territory" is so narrow that often motorists pass too closely, but that's a reason to not curb hug in narrow lanes which we should all know by now.

So, I ask again: How is the "defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on" "given by a bike lane" different from the "defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on" when riding in a sharing position in a wide lane, or in a controlling position in a normal traffic lane?
Helmet Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 12:47 PM   #22
-=(8)=-
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Posts: 7,903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Your theories are wonderful and can be agreed upon, the problem is when
you add humans into the equation everything goes wack.
Human nature being what it is, in US culture people require being given
boundaries. You must live in a very pleasant and civilized place given the
high regard you have for the drivers in your area. Im not that fortunate.
The humans here have proven Darwin wrong. Id say more than less should
not be driving anything. These people require 'off limits' areas because they
are not evolved or civil enuff to figure it out for themselves.
__________________
-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
-=(8)=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 02:24 PM   #23
buzzman
----
 
buzzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Newton, MA
Bikes:
Posts: 4,570
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gcottay View Post
It all depends on the details.
yep.

I use 'em when it suits me and don't when they don't.
There are times I wish they were there and times I couldn't care.
In some cases they are a relief to have available and other times they are redundant due to other options, including riding right along with the traffic.

so I'm with those who say it's all in the details.
buzzman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 03:07 PM   #24
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmet Head View Post
I saw it. That was my point. I guess I have to explain it in more detail.

Riding in the traffic lane also gives a "defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on". If you choose a sharing position in a wide lane, that defines a territory that "most motorists are quite good about not intruding on". If you choose a controlling position, that defines the entire traffic lane as a territory "most motorists are quite good about not intruding on".
---

BZZZZZZ. INCORRECT, sir.

I know that if you're curb hugging in narrow lanes the "defined territory" is so narrow that often motorists pass too closely, but that's a reason to not curb hug in narrow lanes which we should all know by now.

So, I ask again: How is the "defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on" "given by a bike lane" different from the "defined territory that most motorists are quite good about not intruding on" when riding in a sharing position in a wide lane, or in a controlling position in a normal traffic lane?
um, motorists drive all over wide lanes and intrude on all width of a wide lane.

head. wide lanes are ambiguous, and bike lanes define territory.

why are you even trying to argue the contrary?
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-08, 10:26 PM   #25
Helmet Head
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Bikes:
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -=Łem in Pa=- View Post
Your theories are wonderful and can be agreed upon, the problem is when
you add humans into the equation everything goes wack.
Human nature being what it is, in US culture people require being given
boundaries. You must live in a very pleasant and civilized place given the
high regard you have for the drivers in your area. Im not that fortunate.
The humans here have proven Darwin wrong. Id say more than less should
not be driving anything. These people require 'off limits' areas because they
are not evolved or civil enuff to figure it out for themselves.
The basic rules of right of way are understood by most drivers everywhere I've ever ridden a bike or driven a car, and that includes all over the U.S. That's what defines territories in wide lanes, though many cyclists don't seem to understand that.
Helmet Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 AM.