Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > > >

Vehicular Cycling (VC) No other subject has polarized the A&S members like VC has. Here's a place to share, debate, and educate.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-08, 11:53 PM   #1
ubrayj02
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lincoln Heights
Bikes:
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Vehicular Cycling - a motorhead's wet dream?

What other form of cycling completely ignores the benefits of cycling in service of a deep love for traffic engineering standards? I can't think of any, can you?

The problem with being so deeply in love with traffic engineering (as it is practiced in the U.S.), is that this trade is completely circumscribed by the interests of private motorists.

How do traffic engineers measure a roadway?

Level Of Service, Average Daily Trips, Vehicle Miles Traveled, "mobility" (miles traveled, by car, in a set time period) to name just a few.

All of these measures have to do with the number, volume, and speed of private automobiles. No other type of measurements are used to design and plan a roadway. Well, they do use fatalities at crosswalks to eliminate pedestrian facilities, and fatalities on bike lanes to eliminate bike lanes, but you get the idea.

Vehicular Cycling ignores practical methods to affect a better regime of roadway planning in the U.S. - political and cultural change that will lead to a reworking of these car-based standards.

The whole thing reminds me of the inward turning self-improvement movements of the 1970's (after real change in this country was squashed by the government).

If nothing else, VC has turned some of the smartest and hard working cyclists in a generation into anti-human, anti-bike, snobs. They condescend the common man or woman (or child) that wants to safely ride around town to perform the same sort of utilitarian tasks people use their cars for now. I'm 29, and relatively fit - so I use what little I've learned from VC proponents to protect myself. This is like survival training for young men in the military, "Carry this large backpack of water and supplies on you at all times, as you'll need it to survive (young and old folks need not apply)."

This approach to cycling advocacy overlooks the benefits of cycling in a larger transportation planning regime, and it puts off people who don't want to (or simply cannot) ride on city streets averaging 18-25mph on a bike.
ubrayj02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-08, 01:45 PM   #2
uke
it's easy if you let it.
 
uke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: indoors and out.
Bikes:
Posts: 4,124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Of course. This is why VC alone will never lead to more than 1% of the country choosing the bicycle as a means of transportation. Every bike friendly city in the past 50 years has followed the same formula: reduce and restrict the automobile while increasing bike and public transport infrastructure. It's a proven, workable formula that's seen success all over Europe. Most "serious" cyclists in the US, however, insist on trying to push the square wheel of vehicular cycling. And unsurprisingly, we continue to fail each year while other cyclists in other countries follow the blueprint and take back their cities from the automobile. Our loss.
uke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-08, 06:58 PM   #3
ubrayj02
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lincoln Heights
Bikes:
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yet time and again, the lone rear-view mirrored VC proponent shows up at community meetings and demands that bike lanes be removed from transportation plans.

This is so frustrating!

It sometimes feels like their solution to everything is, "Take my Road 1 course!"

I just had to vent, after reading so much inane banter about bike lanes being the work of satan.
ubrayj02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-08, 07:11 PM   #4
gcottay
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
Posts: 3,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yawn.
gcottay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-08, 01:26 PM   #5
ubrayj02
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lincoln Heights
Bikes:
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lol?
ubrayj02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 02:32 AM   #6
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Typical anti-VC rant. A lot of name calling and nothing of substance.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 03:08 AM   #7
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Seems a little VC education might do you some good.

http://ubrayj02.blogspot.com/2005/12....html#comments
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 05:29 AM   #8
Longfemur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have to wonder how you people are riding to get anywhere without using vehicular cycling. It's must be one heck of a free-for-all out there in your towns and cities. Nothing wrong with cycle-specific lanes and paths if they get you where you want, but the problem is, the non-vehicular cyclists are not following normal or common-sense rules of the road on the lanes and paths either. This is why these are so dangerous to ride on if you're a "serious" cyclist (and no, riding dangerously fast in a permanent time-trial on a new Cervelo doesn't make you a serious cyclist). The people in those European cities that people like to give as an example are part of a civilization that is actually civilized. Bike lanes and paths work there because people ride their bikes more sensibly. There is a sense of being part of a community and the common good there. This isn't the case in the me-first and everyone-else-be-damned mentality so prevalent in North America.
Longfemur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 08:37 AM   #9
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by uke View Post
of course. This is why vc alone will never lead to more than 1% of the country choosing the bicycle as a means of transportation. Every bike friendly city in the past 50 years has followed the same formula: Reduce and restrict the automobile while increasing bike and public transport infrastructure. It's a proven, workable formula that's seen success all over europe. Most "serious" cyclists in the us, however, insist on trying to push the square wheel of vehicular cycling. And unsurprisingly, we continue to fail each year while other cyclists in other countries follow the blueprint and take back their cities from the automobile. Our loss.
word.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 08:26 PM   #10
LittleBigMan
Sumanitu taka owaci
 
LittleBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubrayj02 View Post
What other form of cycling completely ignores the benefits of cycling in service of a deep love for traffic engineering standards? I can't think of any, can you?

The problem with being so deeply in love with traffic engineering (as it is practiced in the U.S.), is that this trade is completely circumscribed by the interests of private motorists.

How do traffic engineers measure a roadway?

Level Of Service, Average Daily Trips, Vehicle Miles Traveled, "mobility" (miles traveled, by car, in a set time period) to name just a few.

All of these measures have to do with the number, volume, and speed of private automobiles. No other type of measurements are used to design and plan a roadway. Well, they do use fatalities at crosswalks to eliminate pedestrian facilities, and fatalities on bike lanes to eliminate bike lanes, but you get the idea.

Vehicular Cycling ignores practical methods to affect a better regime of roadway planning in the U.S. - political and cultural change that will lead to a reworking of these car-based standards.

The whole thing reminds me of the inward turning self-improvement movements of the 1970's (after real change in this country was squashed by the government).

If nothing else, VC has turned some of the smartest and hard working cyclists in a generation into anti-human, anti-bike, snobs. They condescend the common man or woman (or child) that wants to safely ride around town to perform the same sort of utilitarian tasks people use their cars for now. I'm 29, and relatively fit - so I use what little I've learned from VC proponents to protect myself. This is like survival training for young men in the military, "Carry this large backpack of water and supplies on you at all times, as you'll need it to survive (young and old folks need not apply)."

This approach to cycling advocacy overlooks the benefits of cycling in a larger transportation planning regime, and it puts off people who don't want to (or simply cannot) ride on city streets averaging 18-25mph on a bike.
I feel that cyclists are not all the same (just take a look at this website!) So any attempt to put all cyclists into one box is futile.

But VC expanded my horizons in daily commuting. I'm grateful for that, but I also encourage a more open-minded, all-inclusive cycling philosophy that embraces as many options for cyclists as possible.

There really is no need for cyclists to war against each other, there are few who really understand us as it is.

(My daily commute is 30 miles round-trip in Atlanta, and I've been commuting for over a decade. I use a MUP for about 2 miles of that trip, homebound only, the other 28 miles on normal roadways ranging from 25 mph to 45 mph., VC-style and very enjoyable.)
__________________
No worries
LittleBigMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-08, 11:41 PM   #11
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
ah, a representative from the 'one percent solution' club speaks out about his pleasures taking the lane in 45mph zones


kowtowing to the current autocentricity thru the coping skills of vc is no way to build ridershare, unfortunately, littlebig.

and that's what the op was talking about. I'm sure we're all real proud of your lane taking ability though!

Last edited by Bekologist; 10-01-08 at 11:44 PM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-08, 04:03 PM   #12
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
More name calling and forum member derision from Bek. Interesting how the 2 west coast bike shop guys (ubrayj02 and Bek) attitudes match up.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-08, 06:47 PM   #13
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
??????? derision...


what attitude? the one succinctly espoused by uke?

Quote:
Originally Posted by uke
Every bike friendly city in the past 50 years has followed the same formula: reduce and restrict the automobile while increasing bike and public transport infrastructure. It's a proven, workable formula that's seen success all over Europe. Most "serious" cyclists in the US, however, insist on trying to push the square wheel of vehicular cycling. And unsurprisingly, we continue to fail each year while other cyclists in other countries follow the blueprint and take back their cities from the automobile. Our loss.
more like a 'firm grasp on reality', CBHI

Last edited by Bekologist; 10-04-08 at 10:54 PM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 03:22 AM   #14
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
??????? derision...


what attitude? the one succinctly espoused by uke?



more like a 'firm grasp on reality', CBHI
So now you wish to follow Uke, the sidewalk cyclist who has not even figured out just how dangerous that behavior is?
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 07:44 AM   #15
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,633
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
More name calling and forum member derision from Bek. Interesting how the 2 west coast bike shop guys (ubrayj02 and Bek) attitudes match up.
name calling? Uh, reaching a bit there CB... for what some personal vendatta?

Look the OP brought up a good point... that essentially roads are not designed with cyclists in mind... and vehicular cycling is simply a coping mechanism to deal with an autocentric environment.

If we ever expect cycling to gain widespread acceptance here in the States, people will have to perceive it as safe and easy as driving...

Vehicular cycling alone is not likely to bring about this scene in America.

genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 11:47 AM   #16
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
^^
Yet countries that were so bicycle freindly, like China, are switching to motor vehicles now that the people can afford them. Other cities were designed in the 16 century based on the ox cart.

So you wish to tear down our cities and convert them to ox cart designs, or would you rather people just become too poor to afford cars? Frankly, I prefer cycing at more then the 6-10 mph that most of those types of towns cyclist are able to travel.

Put in some safe bike paths, that is fine for cut throughs and recreation. But side paths and bike lanes that increase the danger to cyclist is just plain wrong.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 12:30 PM   #17
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,633
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
^^
Yet countries that were so bicycle freindly, like China, are switching to motor vehicles now that the people can afford them.
I am willing to bet that the population of China never adopts the car to the same extent that the US has become dependent upon them. For instance, when I was in Hangzhou just a few years ago working in a brand new technical center with engineers there, I noticed that the placement of the buildings was such that no parking lots existed, nor was there room for parking lots. There were however lots and lots of bicycles. Frankly, they just do not plan for auto traffic. And with dense cities, while they can remodel as I outline below, it just doesn't make sense to not look at the lessons of both America and Europe and plan for people vice cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Other cities were designed in the 16 century based on the ox cart.
So was Boston, and most of the eastern seaboard of the US... yet those cities managed to be changed to allow the autocentric lifestyle of Americans to exist.

At the same time, many of those 16th century cities were bombed into rubble during a couple world wars... yet the countries (and people) determined that bicycles were effective enough transportation so that they did not adopt the "automania" of America.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
So you wish to tear down our cities and convert them to ox cart designs, or would you rather people just become too poor to afford cars?
Such "conversion" happens all the time when a new freeway or Urban Renewal plan goes into effect... the key is designing for people, not just for cars. A recent survey of an east coast city (I believe Baltimore) discovered that over half of the expensive downtown square footage was devoted to autos rather than retail. That realization is causing a change in future plans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Frankly, I prefer cycing at more then the 6-10 mph that most of those types of towns cyclist are able to travel.
Ah, the classic "I wanna go fast" argument... funny, motorists feel the same way when they are driving in the presence of cyclists. How about if we all learn to slow down for the conditions. Save your fast pace for cross town trips on well designed bikeways. Otherwise share the space and moderate your speed for the conditions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Put in some safe bike paths, that is fine for cut throughs and recreation. But side paths and bike lanes that increase the danger to cyclist is just plain wrong.

Well designed facilities are the key... slapping down paint just anywhere is the wrong approach.
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 07:34 PM   #18
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Ah, the classic "I wanna go fast" argument... funny, motorists feel the same way when they are driving in the presence of cyclists. How about if we all learn to slow down for the conditions. Save your fast pace for cross town trips on well designed bikeways. Otherwise share the space and moderate your speed for the conditions.
Limiting cyclist to 6-10 mph will not encourage cycle commuting. My 20 miles one way commute would go from 70 minutes and end up taking 2-3 hours each way. No way am I (and most in these forums) going to spend 4-6 hours a day just to cycle commute.

How about you spend a month limiting your cycling speed to 6-10 mph, then report back to the forum on how much you enjoyed being limited to jogging speed.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 07:40 PM   #19
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Well designed facilities are the key... slapping down paint just anywhere is the wrong approach.
Yet, that is pretty much all we have gotten from the bike lane advocates. They will not even work to fix the bad bike lanes. But they sure whine when other cyclist (especially those who support VC) oppose these bike lanes. I again point to the OP, Bek and Uke.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-08, 07:52 PM   #20
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
naw- thoughtful bike lane designs and poor bike lane remediation are both on the table of the accomodationalists, cbhi- what a load of strawman malarky you peddle.

fingerpointing and why?
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-08, 05:29 AM   #21
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Limiting cyclist to 6-10 mph will not encourage cycle commuting. My 20 miles one way commute would go from 70 minutes and end up taking 2-3 hours each way. No way am I (and most in these forums) going to spend 4-6 hours a day just to cycle commute.

How about you spend a month limiting your cycling speed to 6-10 mph, then report back to the forum on how much you enjoyed being limited to jogging speed.
CB HI's argument that "if a bicyclist has to slow down anywhere, he'll have to reduce his speed everywhere to that lowest speed on his entire route" is, at best, quite silly, and is no different than a commuting motorist whining that if he should slow down to 20 mph when in a school zone he will have to slow down to 20 mph for his entire journey. Pathetic, pitiful or hysterically funny, take your pick.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-08, 08:56 AM   #22
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,633
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Limiting cyclist to 6-10 mph will not encourage cycle commuting. My 20 miles one way commute would go from 70 minutes and end up taking 2-3 hours each way. No way am I (and most in these forums) going to spend 4-6 hours a day just to cycle commute.

How about you spend a month limiting your cycling speed to 6-10 mph, then report back to the forum on how much you enjoyed being limited to jogging speed.
Well slower speeds don't seem to have harmed folks in Europe or China... in fact they quite seem to enjoy moving at a safe and sane speed rather than dressing up like Lance and racing to work.

But How likely is it that your entire 20 mile route would be at that speed?

Further, with well designed wide bike paths, perhaps you could go your top speed for some large percentage of your commute without encountering traffic lights and other traffic, similar to what motorists on their highways enjoy. (or perhaps you'd encounter "rush hour" also like those motorists)

The other thing to consider is that the rest of the population may very well be encouraged to move at a low speed when commuting, but racer boy cyclists may just have to find their thrills at different times/places.

BTW for the record, my commute speed is at about 13MPH when I ride in the streets with traffic. (some of which includes bike lanes) My recreation speed on well designed paths is over 20MPH for the 20 miles of path available to me. (too bad the path doesn't go in the direction of my home)
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-08, 09:08 AM   #23
Febs
Senior Member
 
Febs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ridley Park, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Well slower speeds don't seem to have harmed folks in Europe or China... in fact they quite seem to enjoy moving at a safe and sane speed rather than dressing up like Lance and racing to work.
I love the way that you are able to speak for the entire bicycling populations of Europe and China.
Febs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-08, 09:52 AM   #24
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,633
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Febs View Post
I love the way that you are able to speak for the entire bicycling populations of Europe and China.
Just like CBHI speaks for all cyclists.
Quote:
Limiting cyclist to 6-10 mph will not encourage cycle commuting.
Lets face it, when it comes to cycling for transportation, the mere 1% of Americans doing it by bike are nothing compared to those in various other nations that manage as much as 28% rider share for transportation.

So what is your suggestion for improving the picture here in America for cyclists? What wonderful suggestions do you have? Or are you here only to criticize?
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-08, 08:07 PM   #25
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
CB HI's argument that "if a bicyclist has to slow down anywhere, he'll have to reduce his speed everywhere to that lowest speed on his entire route" is, at best, quite silly, and is no different than a commuting motorist whining that if he should slow down to 20 mph when in a school zone he will have to slow down to 20 mph for his entire journey. Pathetic, pitiful or hysterically funny, take your pick.
Pure BS ILTB, I never said slowing in one area forces slow speeds everywhere. But since the paint and path crowd wants the slow style system everywhere, you should take up your complaint with them.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.