Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > > >

Vehicular Cycling (VC) No other subject has polarized the A&S members like VC has. Here's a place to share, debate, and educate.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-11, 06:11 AM   #26
ianbrettcooper
Senior Member
 
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Firstly, I try never to use the shoulder. The shoulder is about as safe as cycling on the sidewalk - in other words, very unsafe.

About the only times I don't take the lane are when I want to clear the road behind me for some reason, or when the lane is very wide so that cars can pass safely within the same lane. In every other situation, I try to use up enough of the road so that cars can't pass within the same lane.
ianbrettcooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-11, 05:25 PM   #27
gcottay
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
Posts: 3,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I take the lane when, all things considered, that seems like the safest option. For me, the things considered include:
  • presence or absence of marked bike lane or good shoulder
  • lane width
  • obstacles in far right of lane
  • traffic speed and frequency
  • my own speed
  • density of intersections
  • intended turns
  • optional routing
In short, nothing fancy.
gcottay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-11, 11:16 AM   #28
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
I don't 'take the lane' when it safe to move right to facilitate passing by drivers traveling faster than me.
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-11, 06:22 AM   #29
SBRDude
Godfather of Soul
 
SBRDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: 2002 Litespeed Vortex, 2010 Specialized Tricross Expert,2008 Gary Fischer Hi Fi Carbon, 2002 Specialized S-Works hard tail, 1990 Kestrel KM 40
Posts: 1,517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To get in and out of my neighborhood, I ride on a similar road every time, with the exception that it might be hillier and it doesn't have a proper shoulder - just a white line next to the edge of the pavement. I generally ride about 18 to 24 inches from the edge. When I'm going faster, especially through a corner, I will check for traffic behind me and then take more of the lane. When I'm riding slower, I try to stay further to the right. This stretch is only for about 1.5 miles. Whenever I am slowing down a car, it's never for very long and they have an opportunity to pass in short order. This kind of give and take works very well. I don't consider it an unsafe place to ride, but whenever I talk with someone in my neighborhood about riding on this street, they always assume it's unsafe. I even thought it might be unsafe before actually riding on it, so I guess that speaks to the difference in perception between being a motorist and cyclist on the same road.
SBRDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-11, 07:30 AM   #30
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 24,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper View Post
My default philosophy is this: if in doubt, go to the centre of the rightmost lane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper View Post
Regarding overtaking cars and trucks, I always try to ride so that they have to move. Whether they change lanes to do it is up to them, and the usual situation that develops in the real world is what leads me to refer to them as "f***ers" or (if I'm feeling less profane) "nutcases" LOL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper View Post
Anyone who rides 1 to 2 feet from the right is asking to be sideswiped or right hooked. Statistics show that drivers either don't see, or think they can ignore, cyclists who ride so far to the right. They hit such cyclists all the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper View Post
Firstly, I try never to use the shoulder. The shoulder is about as safe as cycling on the sidewalk - in other words, very unsafe.

About the only times I don't take the lane are when I want to clear the road behind me for some reason, or when the lane is very wide so that cars can pass safely within the same lane. In every other situation, I try to use up enough of the road so that cars can't pass within the same lane.
Can this poster, or anybody else, post a specific source for the alleged "Statistics" that support statements/boasts that taking a lane (especially a default policy of riding in the center of a lane) is safer than riding 1 to 2 feet inside the rightlane or using an available highway shoulder?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-11, 03:48 PM   #31
SBRDude
Godfather of Soul
 
SBRDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: 2002 Litespeed Vortex, 2010 Specialized Tricross Expert,2008 Gary Fischer Hi Fi Carbon, 2002 Specialized S-Works hard tail, 1990 Kestrel KM 40
Posts: 1,517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper View Post
Firstly, I try never to use the shoulder. The shoulder is about as safe as cycling on the sidewalk - in other words, very unsafe.

About the only times I don't take the lane are when I want to clear the road behind me for some reason, or when the lane is very wide so that cars can pass safely within the same lane. In every other situation, I try to use up enough of the road so that cars can't pass within the same lane.
What about with higher speed traffic? Still take the lane when cars are going 50 to 60 mph and there is a 12 foot shoulder? If so, what would be the point? If not, then where to you draw the line?
SBRDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 12:10 PM   #32
John Forester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Can this poster, or anybody else, post a specific source for the alleged "Statistics" that support statements/boasts that taking a lane (especially a default policy of riding in the center of a lane) is safer than riding 1 to 2 feet inside the rightlane or using an available highway shoulder?
There has never, to my knowledge, been a study specifically of this point. However, the general car-bike collision statistics (the Cross study) show that a great many more car-bike collisions are associated with cycling close to the edge of the roadway than are associated with, or reasonably caused by, taking the lane.
John Forester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 02:26 PM   #33
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,646
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
There has never, to my knowledge, been a study specifically of this point. However, the general car-bike collision statistics (the Cross study) show that a great many more car-bike collisions are associated with cycling close to the edge of the roadway than are associated with, or reasonably caused by, taking the lane.
This, of course, is because, the vast majority of cyclists ride close to the edge of the roadway. The vast majority of cyclists in accidents are also wearing clothes too (and that doesn't mean cycling naked is safer).
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 05:03 PM   #34
John Forester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
This, of course, is because, the vast majority of cyclists ride close to the edge of the roadway. The vast majority of cyclists in accidents are also wearing clothes too (and that doesn't mean cycling naked is safer).
Not quite. Note that I was cautious about cause and effect, because we don't know, but there is a difference between car-bike collisions that would be definitely caused by taking the lane and those whose causes are most likely to be aggravated by riding close to the edge. For an obvious example, the motorist improper right turn car-bike collision type is far more likely to be associated with riding close to the edge than to be associated with taking the lane.
John Forester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 08:51 PM   #35
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBRDude View Post
What about with higher speed traffic? Still take the lane when cars are going 50 to 60 mph and there is a 12 foot shoulder? If so, what would be the point? If not, then where to you draw the line?
definetly valid questions for the original poster. especially because even the grandfather of vehicular bike operation will use a well provided and safe for use shoulder as a vehikular cyclist without exhibiting an inferiority syndrome.....

EVERY traffic savvy bicyclist - while not blowing smoke on the internet - recognizes the value of ample shoulders along high speed roadways.



i'm betting on 'boast'.

Last edited by Bekologist; 09-17-11 at 08:54 PM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-11, 09:09 AM   #36
John Forester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
definetly valid questions for the original poster. especially because even the grandfather of vehicular bike operation will use a well provided and safe for use shoulder as a vehikular cyclist without exhibiting an inferiority syndrome.....

EVERY traffic savvy bicyclist - while not blowing smoke on the internet - recognizes the value of ample shoulders along high speed roadways.




i'm betting on 'boast'.
Bek, you have always been fixated on the idea that the use of particular kinds of facilities demonstrates something important about the cyclist. For instance, you have long argued that the use of a bike lane is contrary to vehicular cycling principles. I don't know whether or not you have given up that argument; you may have. The more reasonable principle, which I have always stated, is that the cyclist should always obey the rules of the road for drivers of vehicles, which obedience will sometimes put him into the bike lane and sometimes outside it. In the present discussion, the use of a shoulder does not demonstrate either cyclist-inferiority or vehicular-cycling motivation. What is important is the actual motivation and its effect. The cyclist who is motivated by cyclist-inferiority will ride the shoulder right up alongside motor traffic that is turning right, while the cyclist who is motivated by vehicular-cycling will then leave the shoulder to ride with the straight-through traffic. What is important is the motivation of the cyclist and the effect of that motivation upon his behavior, not what kind of facility that cyclist is using at this particular moment.
John Forester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-11, 11:23 AM   #37
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
no, i do not feel riding in bikelanes automatically contradict operation of bicycles in a vehicular manner, but that is neither here nor there. glad to see john makes some concession that vehicular cyclists can indeed ride in bikelanes and do so vehicularly..... that is my contention as well.

we are in agreement on this, john.

in a discussion of Ian's boast to never operate on the shoulders -

as a counterpoint - a cyclist who refuses to ride to safely right and in accordance with vehicular cycling principles exhibits a clear cut case of cyclist inferiority syndrome.

ian's purported riding style is exemplary of a certain, peculiar variant of 'cyclist inferiority' syndrome.

and if the line of traffic is long enough, a vehicular cyclist CAN advance along stopped cars to the right of them, especially if on a safe shoulder or in a clear and safe roadway bikelane./...... this use of a bikelane to the right of stopped cars, since it is a separate traffic lane, does not contradict vehicular operation.

EVERY traffic savvy bicyclist recognizes the value of ample shoulders along high speed roadways.

QED.

Last edited by Bekologist; 09-18-11 at 11:29 AM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-11, 02:07 PM   #38
gcottay
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
Posts: 3,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
. . . . EVERY traffic savvy bicyclist recognizes the value of ample shoulders along high speed roadways . . .
And, I would hope, the value of extra caution when riding the shoulder in an area with many intersections or driveways.
gcottay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-11, 04:07 AM   #39
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
yes, and most high speed roadways with shoulders have limited numbers of both of those.

i was evoking rural shoulders on state highways, not your local 40mph strip mall zone.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-11, 09:40 AM   #40
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,646
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker
This, of course, is because, the vast majority of cyclists ride close to the edge of the roadway. The vast majority of cyclists in accidents are also wearing clothes too (and that doesn't mean cycling naked is safer).
Not quite. Note that I was cautious about cause and effect, because we don't know,
I probably should not have used the word "because" (I was talking about correlation not causation).

Riding at the right is, sometimes, a causal element of a collision. Regardless, all cycling collisions are going to be strongly correlated with riding at the right since that's where cyclists are in an overwhelming frequency.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
but there is a difference between car-bike collisions that would be definitely caused by taking the lane and those whose causes are most likely to be aggravated by riding close to the edge. For an obvious example, the motorist improper right turn car-bike collision type is far more likely to be associated with riding close to the edge than to be associated with taking the lane.
Yes. As I said earlier, there are situations where taking the lane might be safer and other situations where it might not be.

It's the notion that one or the other is always safer that I object to.

Riders need to know more than simple lane positioning to make the right (ie, safest) choice!

Last edited by njkayaker; 09-20-11 at 10:00 AM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-11, 10:31 AM   #41
Doohickie 
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
I take the lane by default, unless it is more than 14' wide. I cede the lane if traffic is behind me and by doing so I can facilitate a safe pass. I'd rather be out in the lane and give it up (a gesture of good will), than ride the shoulder and veer into the lane due to debris. For cars approaching from behind the way I ride, it's

, then

If I rode the other way, drivers would be

, then

By the time they pass me I want them to be
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-11, 06:42 PM   #42
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,402
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doohickie View Post
I take the lane by default, unless it is more than 14' wide. I cede the lane if traffic is behind me and by doing so I can facilitate a safe pass. I'd rather be out in the lane and give it up (a gesture of good will), than ride the shoulder and veer into the lane due to debris. For cars approaching from behind the way I ride, it's

, then

If I rode the other way, drivers would be

, then

By the time they pass me I want them to be
I agree. It seems that if I am going to be in the right tire trace when I am passed, if the motorist saw me move from the center of the lane to get there he/she will give me ample room when passing. If they saw me move from the fog line or a disappearing shoulder to the right tire trace, then I will most often be buzzed.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-12, 02:29 AM   #43
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chalupa102 View Post
I meant to put a poll with this, but my computer messed up and didn't let me.

The options where going to be:

- 2 lane road w/ wide shoulder, I use the shoulder
- 2 lane road w/ wide shoulder, I take the lane
- 2 lane road w/ narrow shoulder, I use the shoulder/ride the white line
- 2 lane road w/ narrow shoulder, I take the lane
- 4 lane road w/ shoulder, I use the shoulder
- 4 lane road w/ shoulder, I take the lane
- If using shoulder, I ride in the middle
- If using shoulder, I line on/near the white line
- Other
The poll doesn't have the option of 'All the time'.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-12, 09:41 PM   #44
DJ Shaun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Bikes: Diamondback Copperhead (hardtail, winter bike), 2014 Giant Rapid 2, 2015 Kona Big Rove ST
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chipcom View Post
If the lane is wide enough to share, share it. If not, own it like you stole it.
+1
DJ Shaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-12, 03:18 PM   #45
Fargo Wolf
Resident smartass.
 
Fargo Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I'll take the lane when and where it's safe to do so. Mostly it's because of being able to ride on "clean" pavement. When I lived in N. Vancouver, BC, I took the lane so I would be in the correct lane to make a turn type thing.
Fargo Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-12, 02:54 AM   #46
SlackerInc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ride on side streets unless there is a bike lane. I take the lane until there is a car approaching from behind, at which point I move over to the right to let them pass (but frustratingly, they often just crawl along tailgating behind even though they have plenty of room to get by).
SlackerInc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-12, 01:54 AM   #47
rimimik
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hello Friend's
your are right...

i full agree with you.
rimimik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-12, 10:22 PM   #48
loneviking61
Senior Member
 
loneviking61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Carson City, NV
Bikes: Schwinn Trailwise, Surly Pugsley
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
I agree. It seems that if I am going to be in the right tire trace when I am passed, if the motorist saw me move from the center of the lane to get there he/she will give me ample room when passing. If they saw me move from the fog line or a disappearing shoulder to the right tire trace, then I will most often be buzzed.
That's been my experience as well. I also tend to ride there as where I live there are lots of disappearing shoulders and lane widths that suddenly vary. You don't want to be in the shoulder, or just to the left of the shoulder line and suddenly have it disappear leaving you to either be in the dirt or suddenly have to merge back into traffic!
loneviking61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-12, 10:57 PM   #49
nerys
Senior Member
 
nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 19057
Bikes: Day 6 Dream 21
Posts: 484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I assume by taking the lane you mean "occupying" it like a car.

#1 a bicycle is a vehicle and has to adhere to the same basic rules as a car.

#2 I "take the lane" when it logically makes sense to keep me safer.

if I am on a multi lane low speed road with an unsafe shoulder I TAKE the right lane that is the safest place for both me and the drivers.

when I make a left turn and there are no cross walks I TAKE the turn lane as if I am a car. its just safer. if you give the cars room to lane share with you or "split" lanes with you many of them "WILL" and this is a recipe for disaster.

if a road appears unsafe for both cars and bikes I avoid that road if at all possible. just not worth it :-)
nerys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-12, 11:07 AM   #50
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well said, nerys. When I was younger, and my bicycle was my only vehicle, I would split the lanes between the right turn lane and the straight through lane when going through an intersection (if I had to stop). I would do the same in left turn lanes, basically getting between the cars going straight and the left turning vehicles. At intersections where I was going straight through, and there was a right turn lane (which is most intersections in Tucson, where I lived at the time), I would take the right turn lane and proceed through, to prevent right hooks.

Now, I take the right through lane when it's feasible, and take the left turn lane. I get in line behind the cars in a left turn lane, unless that would leave in in a more exposed position, but I make it clear to the cars stopped behind that they also have to wait for me to at least clear the intersection.
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 AM.