Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    45 miles/week Eggplant Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    2,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Anyone have the Lake MXZ301 boot?

    I think it's brand new for this year. It looks like the MXZ300 with an easier fastening system... Which was what everyone complained about in the 300.

    I was hoping someone could say whether it is SPD compatible? I assume it is but I didn't see anything on their web site that said for sure.

    Also how comfortable it is etc.

  2. #2
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Home alone
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
    Posts
    6,021
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggplant Jeff
    I think it's brand new for this year. It looks like the MXZ300 with an easier fastening system... Which was what everyone complained about in the 300.

    I was hoping someone could say whether it is SPD compatible? I assume it is but I didn't see anything on their web site that said for sure.

    Also how comfortable it is etc.

    The MXZ300 is SPD compatible and offers removable toe studs. A must have to ride comfortable under the freezing mark.
    Shipping Weight: 4.00 pounds

  3. #3
    45 miles/week Eggplant Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    2,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, but I was asking about the MXZ301, not the MXZ300.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggplant Jeff
    Yes, but I was asking about the MXZ301, not the MXZ300.
    And that's too much for last years model. I've seen them for around $200 on aebike.com and beyondbikes.com.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    portland or
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://www.lickbike.com/productpage.aspx?PART_NUM_SUB='2969-40'
    here is where I got mine.

  6. #6
    Senior Member GreyGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY midstate
    My Bikes
    85 Ross Mt Rainier(for winter road use), 86 Centurion Ironman Master, 92 trek 2300,2005 Iron Horse HollowPoint Expert
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    www.lickbike.com has the mxz300s for $160 (I swear they were just 150 the other day) and the mxz301s for $200.. was the 150 supergo price for the mxz301 or the mxz300s?

  7. #7
    Walkafire
    Guest
    LAKE MXZ301 WINTER BLCK Cleat Type: SPD (I hear the Toe Box is wider then the 300's)
    $163.99
    Alfred E. Bike

    Now has anyone ever heard of a online coupon for AEBIKE?


    EDIT: Just ordered the 301's last night, grrrrr will let ya know how they fit.
    Also... I haven't seen a Coupon for AEBike since 2002
    Last edited by Walkafire; 11-04-05 at 10:45 AM.

  8. #8
    Walkafire
    Guest

    Comfortable down to 10°F & up to 50°F (-12°C to 10°C). The combination of materials & construction brings you the ultimate in cold weather cycling footwear. Water-resistant Pittards WR100®leather upper with neoprene cuff. Full Outlast® temperature regulating lining. 3M™ Thinsulate™ lining in toe box & Thermosol® composite insulating insole for added warmth. All securely fastened to your feet with BOA® lacing system.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    US Men's: 36-50 whole sizes only

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On both the 300's(last years) and 301's....considering people are usually wearing ski-type socks underneath....would I need to order an extra size or half-size up?? I'm worried that if I get the size I usually wear that they might be too small or not stretch like regular shoes if they're snug.

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are the CX road model just as warm as the MX off road model?

  11. #11
    Senior Member GreyGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY midstate
    My Bikes
    85 Ross Mt Rainier(for winter road use), 86 Centurion Ironman Master, 92 trek 2300,2005 Iron Horse HollowPoint Expert
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it's the same basic shoe except for the sole...

  12. #12
    Walkafire
    Guest
    WOW the MXZ301's just went back up to 199.00 on AEBike
    The MXZ300's you can still get for 119.00....but NOT all sizes.

    http://aebike.com/site/page.cfm?Page...and=219&type=T


    Looks like I just made it in for 171.00 Total with shipping for the 301's!

    I think with shipping at the 199.00 price it would be around 206.00 (MXZ301's)

    I also saw (maybe Likebike?) the 300's for around 159.00

  13. #13
    Aluminum. justin79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just got my 301s. The lacing system is pretty cool; I think it will work well. I ordered these a size larger than my summer shoes and when I tried them on with mid-weight wool socks they feel just about right. They came with a little packet of Nikwax for waterproofing. What are people's experiences with the Nikwax on the Lake shoes?

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ranalli
    On both the 300's(last years) and 301's....considering people are usually wearing ski-type socks underneath....would I need to order an extra size or half-size up?? I'm worried that if I get the size I usually wear that they might be too small or not stretch like regular shoes if they're snug.
    You may consider buying two pairs and returning the one that doesn't fit. Most people recommend buying them overly large. But unless you KNOW what the Lake lasts are like, you have no real idea about what their particular sizing system is.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cleveland
    My Bikes
    Pugsley, fixie commuter, track bike
    Posts
    1,567
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by willtsmith_nwi
    You may consider buying two pairs and returning the one that doesn't fit. Most people recommend buying them overly large. But unless you KNOW what the Lake lasts are like, you have no real idea about what their particular sizing system is.
    This is the truth. I have two different Lake's the MX101 in 46 wide and CX 200 in 47. Both fit my wide feet pretty well although the CX 200's are a little long. So I tried the Lake Sandals in a 47 expecting them to fit pretty well. Well the sandals were way to long and barely wide enough. I guess that because they use a Shimano sole for the Sandal and not one based on thier own shoes.
    So I'm curious to here if the Lake MX300 or MX301s run wider or narrower than thier other shoes.
    Craig

  16. #16
    In Transition fruitless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    382
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by justin79
    I just got my 301s. The lacing system is pretty cool; I think it will work well. I ordered these a size larger than my summer shoes and when I tried them on with mid-weight wool socks they feel just about right. They came with a little packet of Nikwax for waterproofing. What are people's experiences with the Nikwax on the Lake shoes?
    I nikwaxed my 300s (before I even realised they included a little tube in the box), the leather in the Lake's really seems compatible with nikwax, I am very satisfied with the results.

  17. #17
    Aluminum. justin79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fruitless
    I nikwaxed my 300s (before I even realised they included a little tube in the box), the leather in the Lake's really seems compatible with nikwax, I am very satisfied with the results.
    I assume the little bit they give you with the shoes is not enough? How many times did you apply?

  18. #18
    In Transition fruitless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    382
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by justin79
    I assume the little bit they give you with the shoes is not enough? How many times did you apply?
    It might be barely enough. I gave all the leather areas a thorough coat, let it soak in for awhile and then rubbed off the excess, then I gave the toe-box a second treatment. The hardest part is keeping it off the neoprene areas.

  19. #19
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Home alone
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
    Posts
    6,021
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by justin79
    I just got my 301s. The lacing system is pretty cool; I think it will work well. I ordered these a size larger than my summer shoes and when I tried them on with mid-weight wool socks they feel just about right. They came with a little packet of Nikwax for waterproofing. What are people's experiences with the Nikwax on the Lake shoes?
    So what size US do you wear and what size did you order? The last time i tried to go up a size in metric to accomodate winter socks i didn't get a large enough shoe. It seems the increments are smaller between metric.

  20. #20
    Aluminum. justin79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranger
    So what size US do you wear and what size did you order? The last time i tried to go up a size in metric to accomodate winter socks i didn't get a large enough shoe. It seems the increments are smaller between metric.
    One size up seemed fine to me. I wear a 12 or 13 US. My regular cycling shoes are 46 and the Lake shoes are 47s.

  21. #21
    Walkafire
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by justin79
    One size up seemed fine to me. I wear a 12 or 13 US. My regular cycling shoes are 46 and the Lake shoes are 47s.
    I have had a few days to ride with the New Lake 301's...
    They are GREAT!
    I got size 48, which is a PERFECT FIT for my size 13.5 (US)
    I wear 48 (14 US) in Answer shoes. (seems no Two Companies are the same size)

    But the Toe Box feels great! I have worn heavy socks already to test them.
    They are the Warmest I have ever had.
    No more Booties unless I wear my Summer Shoes.

    Only Problem I see for OTHER people is.... SIZE
    I can't find the Sizing Chart now, but I will look for it.
    You see, there seemed to be a BIG jump from 47 to 48... I could be wrong... naaaa LOL
    I am thinking maybe Size 12 to 13.5 (US)?

    I am thinking the sizing is Right on the Money for LAKE Shoes.

    I wear a 13.5 US and the Lake 48 fits like a Glove! (with room for a little heavier sock)

  22. #22
    45 miles/week Eggplant Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    2,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Walkafire, how wide are your feet? I have really wide feet, but only size 13 length-wise. I'm wondering if the 48's will be wide enough or if I'll need to get the 50's (they don't seem to make 49's).

    For comparison, I always wear at least a 13 wide shoe in regular sneakers, sometimes a 14 wide.
    Treasurer, HHCMF Club
    Now living in the land of the cheesesteak.
    But working at a job where I can't surf BikeForums all day any more...

  23. #23
    Walkafire
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggplant Jeff
    Walkafire, how wide are your feet? I have really wide feet, but only size 13 length-wise. I'm wondering if the 48's will be wide enough or if I'll need to get the 50's (they don't seem to make 49's).

    For comparison, I always wear at least a 13 wide shoe in regular sneakers, sometimes a 14 wide.
    EGG, I always wear a 14. Do to the fact I have 13.5 feet. I tend to look for the WIDE SHOES as well.
    These 301's work well for me.

    When you buy the 301's, I know you will, get the 48's, BUT! (there's always a BUT in life) make sure of the RETURN POLICY where you buy them.

    Good Luck to ya,

  24. #24
    Senior Member GreyGoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY midstate
    My Bikes
    85 Ross Mt Rainier(for winter road use), 86 Centurion Ironman Master, 92 trek 2300,2005 Iron Horse HollowPoint Expert
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Walkafire, how restrictive is the upper on the 301s? Can you use the ankle at all in the pedal stroke, or is it eliminated by the support provided by the uppers?.. I am recovering from a broken lower leg and am hoping the support of the 301s will help me return(still at least 3 weeks left in cast and I will start with windtrainer first for a while) does the upper feel like it provides support that may help me here?...

  25. #25
    Aluminum. justin79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not impressed. I tried them yesterday in the rain and I had hoped they would be a little more water resistant than they were. Treating the leather with the Nikwax made the lower part pretty close to waterproof, but I couldn't keep my pants down low enough to cover the neoprene cuffs which let water in and eventually soaked my feet. The shoes are probably pretty warm in dry conditions, but I don't really see the point of having them if I still have to wear shoe covers in the wet anyway.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •