Just ordered some Nokian Extreme 294's!!!
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just ordered some Nokian Extreme 294's!!!
Even though i said i wouldn't do it, i just pulled the trigger on a pair of Nokian Extreme 294's. I currently have Nokian Mount and Ground's which i have fallen out of love with. This will be my third set of studded tires in the last few years so I am going to quickly become an expert or a broke vegetable.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 284
Bikes: Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Comp, Specialized Rockhopper Comp, Gt Timberline
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They are excellent tires. I just started using them this year and they have gotten me over some rough stuff. The roads were a mix today with ice patches all over, snow, slush, but the 294's kept me upright and moving forward.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,372
Bikes: Lemond Alpe d´Huez, Scott Sub 10, homemade mtb, Radlbauer adler (old city bike), Dahon impulse (folder with 20 inch wheels), haibike eq xduro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
keep the M & Gs for the basically clear days where there might just be the danger of running into the occasional patch of ice
__________________
only the dead have seen the end of mass motorized stupidity
Plato
(well if he was alive today he would have written it)
only the dead have seen the end of mass motorized stupidity
Plato
(well if he was alive today he would have written it)
#7
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That's what i am thinking. The M and G's have been pretty nice here lately when things have started to melt and improve. The rolling resistance is pretty minimal i suspect compared to the 294's and probably quite likely the m and g's are suitable for most conditions around here most days.
#8
King of the Hipsters
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,128
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Over the past 4 years I have ridden Innova's, Nokian 106's, Nokian 240's, and now Nokian 294's.
Surprisingly, and subjectively, the 294's seem to have the least rolling resistance.
However, they have a huge amount of inertia, which makes itself felt when accelerating.
Tonight as I rode home I encountered some just-frozen rutted slush.
The 294's didn't climb the sides of the ruts as well as I had hoped, but I never had the feeling they would go out from underneath me, as long as I kept riding.
The 294's represent as much of an improvement over the 240's as the 240's represented an improvement over the 106's, with the exception of the rolling resistance and inertia.
The 294's have less rolling resistance and significantly more inertia.
Surprisingly, and subjectively, the 294's seem to have the least rolling resistance.
However, they have a huge amount of inertia, which makes itself felt when accelerating.
Tonight as I rode home I encountered some just-frozen rutted slush.
The 294's didn't climb the sides of the ruts as well as I had hoped, but I never had the feeling they would go out from underneath me, as long as I kept riding.
The 294's represent as much of an improvement over the 240's as the 240's represented an improvement over the 106's, with the exception of the rolling resistance and inertia.
The 294's have less rolling resistance and significantly more inertia.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the 294s don't stick to it ... virtually nothing will. The issue isn't the studs, it's the width. 294s are advertised as 2.1" tires, but they're really closer to 1.9". For snow you want to have the widest tire available. Now who does snow but never sees ice ... and vice versa?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
King of the Hipsters
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,128
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by BearSquirrel
The 294s have a larger diameter than the 240. This changes the effective gearing ratio. This is likely what you are feeling.
The Nokians simply weigh 900+ grams and this represents inertia.
I ride a fixed gear bike, and so I might have more sensitivity to inertia than someone riding a geared bike.
The 294's, in my humble opinion, have remarkably low rolling resistance for a knobby studded tire, but they have the inertia one would expect from a 900+ gram tire.
#12
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Took my maiden voyage on the Nokian 294's today, and I must say that i am pleased. Last night we had 4" of snow and so out I went this morning. There may have been some negligible ice under the snow but for the most part it was just snow.
And man these things are a MAJOR improvement over the Mount and Ground's in snow. Going was slow of course in 4" of snow but it was fun and i felt in control the entire time. The tires chewed through the snow better than anything I have ever used.
And man these things are a MAJOR improvement over the Mount and Ground's in snow. Going was slow of course in 4" of snow but it was fun and i felt in control the entire time. The tires chewed through the snow better than anything I have ever used.
#13
Burn-em Upus Icephaltus
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,357
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nice pic! Save that pic for future studded tire wear comparison. So we can see how well they hold up and believe me they do hold up with some wear on the center studs. Its been 3 plus years on my set of 294s.
__________________
Sick BubbleGum
Sick BubbleGum
#14
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nice Portis! I recently bought a pair if Extreme 294's as well.
They are slow and loud when I hit a clear patch, but they really
dig in to the ice and packed snow. I never new icebiking could be so much fun.
I usually ride on paths that aren't cleared. The hardest part is riding over people's
frozen footsteps. Its a bumpy ride.
By the way your pic is too big, it's stretching the whole page out.
They are slow and loud when I hit a clear patch, but they really
dig in to the ice and packed snow. I never new icebiking could be so much fun.
I usually ride on paths that aren't cleared. The hardest part is riding over people's
frozen footsteps. Its a bumpy ride.
By the way your pic is too big, it's stretching the whole page out.
#15
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the 294s don't stick to it ... virtually nothing will. The issue isn't the studs, it's the width. 294s are advertised as 2.1" tires, but they're really closer to 1.9". For snow you want to have the widest tire available. Now who does snow but never sees ice ... and vice versa?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, CT
Posts: 680
Bikes: '98 Rhygin SS road,'99 Fat Chance Ti Fat, '95 Azonic Mtn bike, '88 Giant Sedona.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Bottom line, you gotta pay if you want to play. Buy cheap ones, you pay more in the long run.